Alternative and ICT-based Advisory and Extension Approaches in the Tea Sector in Sri Lanka: An Explorative Study

P. Weththasinghe, U. I. Dissanayeke
{"title":"Alternative and ICT-based Advisory and Extension Approaches in the Tea Sector in Sri Lanka: An Explorative Study","authors":"P. Weththasinghe, U. I. Dissanayeke","doi":"10.4038/tar.v35i1.8703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study evaluated the usage level of alternative and information communication technology-based advisory and extension approaches, factors affecting the usage behavior, and limitations for implementing such approaches among advisory and extension officials in the tea sector in Sri Lanka during 2020-2022. An online survey was conducted with 72 officials. The majority were male (61%) and the mean age was 41 years. Most (47%) had up to diploma level education with a mean experience of 13 years. The government-imposed restrictions on public gatherings have significantly influenced the advisory and extension in the tea sector during 2020-2022. Respondents mainly connected with growers using mobile phone calls (76.6%) and WhatsApp messages (50%). Lack of communication infrastructure (62.5%), poor ICT knowledge and skills (51.6%), connection issues (57.8%), and inability to observe field conditions (68.8%) are the main barriers encountered by respondents. The main barriers faced by the farmers included lack of communication infrastructure (64.1%), poor ICT knowledge and skills (65.6%), connection issues (68.8%), inability to share quality photos (67.2%), and data cost (60.9%). The Majority of respondents (> 50%) showed positive perceptions towards these approaches and are willing to use them (73.4%) in the future. The results of Spearman’s correlation test showed relationships between the usage frequency of alternative approaches with education (r=0.455, p= 0.000) and age (r= -0.267, p= 0.033). There was a relationship between officials’ perception of alternatives and their usage frequency (r=0.504, p=0.000). In conclusion, the usage of ICT-based methods was higher among young and educated Officials.","PeriodicalId":23313,"journal":{"name":"Tropical agricultural research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical agricultural research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v35i1.8703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study evaluated the usage level of alternative and information communication technology-based advisory and extension approaches, factors affecting the usage behavior, and limitations for implementing such approaches among advisory and extension officials in the tea sector in Sri Lanka during 2020-2022. An online survey was conducted with 72 officials. The majority were male (61%) and the mean age was 41 years. Most (47%) had up to diploma level education with a mean experience of 13 years. The government-imposed restrictions on public gatherings have significantly influenced the advisory and extension in the tea sector during 2020-2022. Respondents mainly connected with growers using mobile phone calls (76.6%) and WhatsApp messages (50%). Lack of communication infrastructure (62.5%), poor ICT knowledge and skills (51.6%), connection issues (57.8%), and inability to observe field conditions (68.8%) are the main barriers encountered by respondents. The main barriers faced by the farmers included lack of communication infrastructure (64.1%), poor ICT knowledge and skills (65.6%), connection issues (68.8%), inability to share quality photos (67.2%), and data cost (60.9%). The Majority of respondents (> 50%) showed positive perceptions towards these approaches and are willing to use them (73.4%) in the future. The results of Spearman’s correlation test showed relationships between the usage frequency of alternative approaches with education (r=0.455, p= 0.000) and age (r= -0.267, p= 0.033). There was a relationship between officials’ perception of alternatives and their usage frequency (r=0.504, p=0.000). In conclusion, the usage of ICT-based methods was higher among young and educated Officials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯里兰卡茶叶行业基于信息和通信技术的替代咨询和推广方法:探索性研究
本研究评估了基于信息通信技术的替代咨询和推广方法的使用水平、影响使用行为的因素,以及 2020-2022 年期间斯里兰卡茶叶部门咨询和推广官员实施此类方法的局限性。对 72 名官员进行了在线调查。大部分为男性(61%),平均年龄为 41 岁。大多数人(47%)拥有大专以上学历,平均工作经验为 13 年。政府对公众集会的限制极大地影响了 2020-2022 年期间茶叶行业的咨询和推广工作。受访者主要通过手机通话(76.6%)和 WhatsApp 消息(50%)与种植者联系。受访者遇到的主要障碍是缺乏通信基础设施(62.5%)、信息和通信技术知识与技能不足(51.6%)、连接问题(57.8%)以及无法观察田间情况(68.8%)。农民面临的主要障碍包括缺乏通信基础设施(64.1%)、信息与传播技术知识和技能不足 (65.6%)、连接问题(68.8%)、无法分享高质量照片(67.2%)和数据成本(60.9%)。大多数受访者(超过 50%)对这些方法持积极态度,并愿意在未来使用这些方法(73.4%)。斯皮尔曼相关检验结果表明,替代方法的使用频率与学历(r=0.455,p= 0.000)和年龄(r=-0.267,p= 0.033)之间存在关系。官员对替代方法的看法与使用频率之间存在关系(r=0.504,p=0.000)。总之,年轻和受过教育的官员使用基于信息和通信技术的方法较多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Production and Dietary Diversities with Seasonality in Rural Agricultural Context in Sri Lanka: A Case of Mahakanumulla Village Tank Cascade System Changes in Total and Available K Contents in Feldspar and Mica Co-pyrolyzed with Poultry Litter at Different Temperatures Introducing a ‘Postharvest Loss Index (PHLI)’ for Some Selected High Producing Vegetables in Sri Lanka to Enhance Food Security Behavioral Intention of Paddy Farmers Towards Adoption of Organic Sources for Soil Nutrient Management Consequent to Policy Decision to Ban Agro-chemicals in Sri Lanka: A Case Study Solid Formulation of Trichoderma virens for the Management of Banana Anthracnose Caused by Colletotrichum musae
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1