Hydrological Projections under CMIP5 and CMIP6: Sources and Magnitudes of Uncertainty

IF 6.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI:10.1175/bams-d-23-0104.1
Yi Wu, Chiyuan Miao, Louise Slater, Xuewei Fan, Yuanfang Chai, Soroosh Sorooshian
{"title":"Hydrological Projections under CMIP5 and CMIP6: Sources and Magnitudes of Uncertainty","authors":"Yi Wu, Chiyuan Miao, Louise Slater, Xuewei Fan, Yuanfang Chai, Soroosh Sorooshian","doi":"10.1175/bams-d-23-0104.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Projections of future hydrological conditions rely largely on global climate models, but model performance varies greatly. In this study, we investigated projected changes in runoff (R), precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET), and soil moisture (SM) based on the fifth and sixth phases of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5 and CMIP6) and quantified the uncertainties of their projected changes on annual and seasonal scales. The results indicate that all four hydrological variables show an increase over most of the global land: annual projections of R, P, ET, and SM from CMIP6 increase in 72%, 81%, 82%, and 66% of the global land area, respectively, under a high emissions scenario during the period 2080–99 relative to 1970–99. We estimated the uncertainties in CMIP6 from different sources on an annual scale and found that model uncertainty dominates the total projected uncertainties during the twenty-first century [76% (R), 73% (P), 89% (ET), and 95% (SM) in the 2090s], and the contribution of internal variability decreases with time. The low-latitude regions have the greatest uncertainty in hydrological projections. In CMIP6, the uncertainty of projected changes in P contributes the most to the uncertainty of projected changes in R, with a contribution of 93% on annual scale, followed by ET and SM. Overall, the performances of the CMIP5 and CMIP6 models are similar in terms of hydrological changes and the composition of their uncertainties. This study provides a theoretical reference for the further improvement and development of hydrological components in global climate models.","PeriodicalId":9464,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-23-0104.1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Projections of future hydrological conditions rely largely on global climate models, but model performance varies greatly. In this study, we investigated projected changes in runoff (R), precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET), and soil moisture (SM) based on the fifth and sixth phases of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5 and CMIP6) and quantified the uncertainties of their projected changes on annual and seasonal scales. The results indicate that all four hydrological variables show an increase over most of the global land: annual projections of R, P, ET, and SM from CMIP6 increase in 72%, 81%, 82%, and 66% of the global land area, respectively, under a high emissions scenario during the period 2080–99 relative to 1970–99. We estimated the uncertainties in CMIP6 from different sources on an annual scale and found that model uncertainty dominates the total projected uncertainties during the twenty-first century [76% (R), 73% (P), 89% (ET), and 95% (SM) in the 2090s], and the contribution of internal variability decreases with time. The low-latitude regions have the greatest uncertainty in hydrological projections. In CMIP6, the uncertainty of projected changes in P contributes the most to the uncertainty of projected changes in R, with a contribution of 93% on annual scale, followed by ET and SM. Overall, the performances of the CMIP5 and CMIP6 models are similar in terms of hydrological changes and the composition of their uncertainties. This study provides a theoretical reference for the further improvement and development of hydrological components in global climate models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CMIP5 和 CMIP6 下的水文预测:不确定性的来源和程度
摘要 对未来水文条件的预测主要依赖于全球气候模式,但模式的性能差异很大。在本研究中,我们根据耦合模式相互比较项目(CMIP5 和 CMIP6)的第五和第六阶段,研究了径流(R)、降水(P)、蒸散(ET)和土壤湿度(SM)的预测变化,并量化了它们在年度和季节尺度上的预测变化的不确定性。结果表明,在全球大部分陆地上,所有四个水文变量都出现了增长:与 1970-99 年相比,在 2080-99 年期间的高排放情景下,CMIP6 预测的 R、P、ET 和 SM 的年增长率在全球陆地上分别为 72%、81%、82% 和 66%。我们按年估算了 CMIP6 中不同来源的不确定性,发现模型的不确定性在 21 世纪的总预测不确定性中占主导地位[2090 年代为 76%(R)、73%(P)、89%(ET)和 95%(SM)],而内部变率的贡献则随着时间的推移而减小。低纬度地区水文预测的不确定性最大。在 CMIP6 中,预测的 P 变化的不确定性对预测的 R 变化的不确定性影响最大,在年尺度上占 93%,其次是 ET 和 SM。总体而言,CMIP5 和 CMIP6 模型在水文变化及其不确定性构成方面表现相似。这项研究为进一步改进和发展全球气候模式中的水文成分提供了理论参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (BAMS) is the flagship magazine of AMS and publishes articles of interest and significance for the weather, water, and climate community as well as news, editorials, and reviews for AMS members.
期刊最新文献
Bridging the COSMOS: How the inclusion of and collaboration with Faith-based Understandings and Indigenous Knowledges can transform the Weather, Water, and Climate Enterprise Peering into cloud physics using ultra-fine resolution radar and lidar systems Advancing Marine Arctic Science Through Facilitating International Collaborations Quasi-linear convective systems and derechoes across Europe: climatology, accompanying hazards and societal impacts Lev Gutman – A Pioneer in Theoretical Mesoscale Meteorology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1