Implementation of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for radical cystectomy patients: A single centre experience.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4111/icu.20230282
Brendan A Yanada, Brendan H Dias, Niall M Corcoran, Homayoun Zargar, Conrad Bishop, Sue Wallace, Diana Hayes, James G Huang
{"title":"Implementation of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for radical cystectomy patients: A single centre experience.","authors":"Brendan A Yanada, Brendan H Dias, Niall M Corcoran, Homayoun Zargar, Conrad Bishop, Sue Wallace, Diana Hayes, James G Huang","doi":"10.4111/icu.20230282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for radical cystectomy aims to facilitate postoperative recovery and hasten a return to normal daily activities. This study aims to report on the perioperative outcomes of implementation of an ERAS protocol at a single Australian institution.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We identified 73 patients with pT1-T4 bladder cancer who underwent open radical cystectomy at Western Health, Victoria between June 2016 and August 2021. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed. Perioperative outcomes included length of hospital stay, nasogastric tube requirement and duration of postoperative ileus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 74 years (interquartile range [IQR] 66-78) for the ERAS group and 70 years (IQR 65-78) for the pre-ERAS group patients. All patients in each group underwent ileal conduit formation. The median length of hospital stay was 7.0 days (IQR 7.0-9.3) for the ERAS group and 12.0 days (IQR 8.0-16.0) for the pre-ERAS group (p=0.003). Within the ERAS group, 25.0% had a postoperative ileus, and 25.0% had a nasogastric tube inserted, compared with 64.9% (p=0.001) and 45.9% (p=0.063) respectively within pre-ERAS group. The median bowel function recovery time, defined as duration from surgery to first bowel action, was 5.0 days (IQR 4.0-7.0) in the ERAS group and 7.5 days (IQR 5.0-8.5) in the pre-ERAS group (p=0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of an ERAS protocol is associated with a reduction in hospital length of stay, postoperative ileus and bowel function recovery time.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"65 1","pages":"32-39"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10789537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20230282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for radical cystectomy aims to facilitate postoperative recovery and hasten a return to normal daily activities. This study aims to report on the perioperative outcomes of implementation of an ERAS protocol at a single Australian institution.

Materials and methods: We identified 73 patients with pT1-T4 bladder cancer who underwent open radical cystectomy at Western Health, Victoria between June 2016 and August 2021. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed. Perioperative outcomes included length of hospital stay, nasogastric tube requirement and duration of postoperative ileus.

Results: The median age was 74 years (interquartile range [IQR] 66-78) for the ERAS group and 70 years (IQR 65-78) for the pre-ERAS group patients. All patients in each group underwent ileal conduit formation. The median length of hospital stay was 7.0 days (IQR 7.0-9.3) for the ERAS group and 12.0 days (IQR 8.0-16.0) for the pre-ERAS group (p=0.003). Within the ERAS group, 25.0% had a postoperative ileus, and 25.0% had a nasogastric tube inserted, compared with 64.9% (p=0.001) and 45.9% (p=0.063) respectively within pre-ERAS group. The median bowel function recovery time, defined as duration from surgery to first bowel action, was 5.0 days (IQR 4.0-7.0) in the ERAS group and 7.5 days (IQR 5.0-8.5) in the pre-ERAS group (p=0.016).

Conclusions: Implementation of an ERAS protocol is associated with a reduction in hospital length of stay, postoperative ileus and bowel function recovery time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对根治性膀胱切除术患者实施术后恢复强化方案:单个中心的经验。
目的:根治性膀胱切除术的术后强化恢复(ERAS)方案旨在促进术后恢复,加快恢复正常的日常活动。本研究旨在报告澳大利亚一家医疗机构实施ERAS方案的围手术期结果:我们确定了 2016 年 6 月至 2021 年 8 月期间在维多利亚州 Western Health 医院接受开放式根治性膀胱切除术的 73 名 pT1-T4 膀胱癌患者。我们对前瞻性数据库进行了回顾性分析。围手术期结果包括住院时间、鼻胃管需求和术后回肠梗阻时间:ERAS组患者的中位年龄为74岁(四分位距[IQR]66-78),ERAS前组患者的中位年龄为70岁(四分位距[IQR]65-78)。每组所有患者均接受了回肠导管成形术。ERAS 组患者的中位住院时间为 7.0 天(IQR 7.0-9.3),ERAS 前组患者的中位住院时间为 12.0 天(IQR 8.0-16.0)(P=0.003)。在ERAS组中,25.0%的患者术后出现回肠梗阻,25.0%的患者需要插入鼻胃管,而在ERAS前组中,这两个比例分别为64.9%(p=0.001)和45.9%(p=0.063)。ERAS组的肠功能恢复时间(定义为从手术到首次排便的持续时间)中位数为5.0天(IQR为4.0-7.0),而ERAS前组的恢复时间中位数为7.5天(IQR为5.0-8.5)(p=0.016):ERAS方案的实施缩短了住院时间、术后回肠梗阻和肠道功能恢复时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1