Policies, Practices, and Environmental Characteristics Among Family Child Care Homes in South Carolina.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Childhood Obesity Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1089/chi.2023.0135
Russell R Pate, Daniel A Zaltz, Brian Neelon, Tiange Liu, Agnes Bucko, Sara E Benjamin-Neelon
{"title":"Policies, Practices, and Environmental Characteristics Among Family Child Care Homes in South Carolina.","authors":"Russell R Pate, Daniel A Zaltz, Brian Neelon, Tiange Liu, Agnes Bucko, Sara E Benjamin-Neelon","doi":"10.1089/chi.2023.0135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Child care program requirements have adopted nutrition and physical activity standards to address childhood obesity, but few studies have examined the effects of these standards in family child care homes (FCCHs). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In a cross-sectional study (2017-2019), the Childcare Home Eating and Exercise study examined self-reported provider characteristics and observed policies and practices related to physical activity and nutrition in FCCHs in South Carolina. Two-sample <i>t</i>-tests were used to compare observed nutrition and physical activity policy, practice, and environment scores in child care homes that participated in versus did not participate in the state's ABC Quality program, which is designed to improve child care and includes policies and practices intended to increase physical activity levels and improve diet quality. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Environment and Policy Assessment and Observation results for nutrition and physical activity were 7.5 out of 21 and 11.8 out of 30, respectively, indicating much room for improvement in nutrition and physical activity policies, practices, and environment in South Carolina FCCHs. The study found one difference between FCCHs that did and did not participate in the ABC Quality program; non-ABC homes provided more time for physical activity. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Future research should develop ways to strengthen the guidelines and improve the implementation of obesity prevention standards in FCCHs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48842,"journal":{"name":"Childhood Obesity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2023.0135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Child care program requirements have adopted nutrition and physical activity standards to address childhood obesity, but few studies have examined the effects of these standards in family child care homes (FCCHs). Methods: In a cross-sectional study (2017-2019), the Childcare Home Eating and Exercise study examined self-reported provider characteristics and observed policies and practices related to physical activity and nutrition in FCCHs in South Carolina. Two-sample t-tests were used to compare observed nutrition and physical activity policy, practice, and environment scores in child care homes that participated in versus did not participate in the state's ABC Quality program, which is designed to improve child care and includes policies and practices intended to increase physical activity levels and improve diet quality. Results: Environment and Policy Assessment and Observation results for nutrition and physical activity were 7.5 out of 21 and 11.8 out of 30, respectively, indicating much room for improvement in nutrition and physical activity policies, practices, and environment in South Carolina FCCHs. The study found one difference between FCCHs that did and did not participate in the ABC Quality program; non-ABC homes provided more time for physical activity. Conclusions: Future research should develop ways to strengthen the guidelines and improve the implementation of obesity prevention standards in FCCHs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南卡罗来纳州家庭托儿所的政策、做法和环境特征。
背景:托儿计划要求采用营养和体育活动标准来解决儿童肥胖问题,但很少有研究考察这些标准在家庭托儿所(FCCHs)中的效果。研究方法在一项横断面研究(2017-2019 年)中,托儿所饮食与锻炼研究考察了南卡罗来纳州托儿所中自我报告的提供者特征以及观察到的与体育活动和营养相关的政策和实践。研究采用双样本 t 检验比较了参加和未参加该州 ABC 质量计划的托儿所的营养和体育活动政策、实践和环境观察得分,该计划旨在改善托儿所,包括旨在提高体育活动水平和改善饮食质量的政策和实践。结果:营养和体育活动的环境和政策评估及观察结果分别为 7.5 分(满分 21 分)和 11.8 分(满分 30 分),这表明南卡罗来纳州托儿所的营养和体育活动政策、实践和环境还有很大的改进空间。研究发现,参与和未参与 ABC 优质计划的幼儿保育院之间存在一个差异;未参与 ABC 计划的幼儿保育院提供了更多的体育活动时间。结论:未来的研究应开发出强化指南的方法,并改善家庭儿童保健中心肥胖预防标准的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Childhood Obesity
Childhood Obesity PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Childhood Obesity is the only peer-reviewed journal that delivers actionable, real-world obesity prevention and weight management strategies for children and adolescents. Health disparities and cultural sensitivities are addressed, and plans and protocols are recommended to effect change at the family, school, and community level. The Journal also reports on the problem of access to effective healthcare and delivers evidence-based solutions to overcome these barriers.
期刊最新文献
Medical Home Access Among Children with Obesity: The Role of Family-Centered Communication. Protective Eating Behaviors Among Children at Higher Risk for Obesity in the INSIGHT Study. The Unintended Psychosocial Consequences of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Children and Adolescents: A Call for More Research. Race/Ethnicity Modifies the Relationship Between Diet Quality at the Home- and Individual-Levels and Weight Status Among African American and Hispanic/Latinx Households With Preschool-Age Children. Independent and Interactive Associations of Subjective and Objective Socioeconomic Status With Body Composition and Parent-Reported Hyperphagia Among Children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1