Comparing Group Versus Individual Prenatal Care on Breastfeeding Practice and Motivational Factors.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1097/JPN.0000000000000769
Heewon L Gray, Diana Rancourt, Saba Masho, Marilyn Stern
{"title":"Comparing Group Versus Individual Prenatal Care on Breastfeeding Practice and Motivational Factors.","authors":"Heewon L Gray, Diana Rancourt, Saba Masho, Marilyn Stern","doi":"10.1097/JPN.0000000000000769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although breastfeeding in the first 6 months postpartum benefits both infants and mothers, breastfeeding rates remain low. This study examined whether group prenatal care was associated with an increased breastfeeding initiation and duration compared with those receiving usual, individual prenatal care. A secondary aim was to investigate whether sociodemographic and motivational factors were associated with breastfeeding initiation and duration across prenatal care groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant women in their third trimester (n = 211) from an innercity university medical center participated. Prenatal care type was identified from the medical chart, and data on breastfeeding duration at 1, 3, and 6 months postpartum were collected. Breastfeeding motivational factors were assessed with a survey. Logistic regressions and independent-samples t tests were used for data analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for demographic factors, group prenatal care was associated with increased breastfeeding at 6 months postpartum (odds ratio = 2.66; P = .045) compared with individual care. Breastfeeding intention (P < .001), competence (P = .003), and autonomous motivation (P < .001) were significantly higher, while amotivation (P = .034) was significantly lower in group compared with individual prenatal care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Breastfeeding persistence was higher among women receiving group prenatal care, potentially due to motivational factors. Future studies should investigate how breastfeeding motivational factors could be effectively targeted in prenatal care to increase breastfeeding persistence.</p>","PeriodicalId":54773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000769","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Although breastfeeding in the first 6 months postpartum benefits both infants and mothers, breastfeeding rates remain low. This study examined whether group prenatal care was associated with an increased breastfeeding initiation and duration compared with those receiving usual, individual prenatal care. A secondary aim was to investigate whether sociodemographic and motivational factors were associated with breastfeeding initiation and duration across prenatal care groups.

Methods: Pregnant women in their third trimester (n = 211) from an innercity university medical center participated. Prenatal care type was identified from the medical chart, and data on breastfeeding duration at 1, 3, and 6 months postpartum were collected. Breastfeeding motivational factors were assessed with a survey. Logistic regressions and independent-samples t tests were used for data analyses.

Results: After controlling for demographic factors, group prenatal care was associated with increased breastfeeding at 6 months postpartum (odds ratio = 2.66; P = .045) compared with individual care. Breastfeeding intention (P < .001), competence (P = .003), and autonomous motivation (P < .001) were significantly higher, while amotivation (P = .034) was significantly lower in group compared with individual prenatal care.

Conclusions: Breastfeeding persistence was higher among women receiving group prenatal care, potentially due to motivational factors. Future studies should investigate how breastfeeding motivational factors could be effectively targeted in prenatal care to increase breastfeeding persistence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较集体与个人产前护理对母乳喂养实践和动机因素的影响。
目的:虽然产后 6 个月内的母乳喂养对婴儿和母亲都有好处,但母乳喂养率仍然很低。本研究探讨了与接受常规个人产前护理的产妇相比,集体产前护理是否与母乳喂养的开始和持续时间的增加有关。另一个目的是调查社会人口和动机因素是否与不同产前护理组的母乳喂养开始率和持续时间有关:来自市内一所大学医疗中心的怀孕三个月的孕妇(n = 211)参加了此次研究。根据病历确定产前护理类型,并收集产后 1、3 和 6 个月的母乳喂养持续时间数据。母乳喂养动机因素通过调查进行评估。数据分析采用逻辑回归和独立样本 t 检验:结果:在控制了人口统计学因素后,与个人护理相比,集体产前护理与产后 6 个月母乳喂养的增加有关(几率比 = 2.66;P = .045)。与个人产前护理相比,集体产前护理的母乳喂养意向(P < .001)、能力(P = .003)和自主动机(P < .001)显著较高,而非母乳喂养动机(P = .034)显著较低:结论:接受集体产前护理的妇女坚持母乳喂养的比例更高,这可能是由于动机因素所致。未来的研究应探讨如何在产前护理中有效地针对母乳喂养的动机因素来提高母乳喂养的持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
147
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing (JPNN) strives to advance the practice of evidence-based perinatal and neonatal nursing through peer-reviewed articles in a topic-oriented format. Each issue features scholarly manuscripts, continuing education options, and columns on expert opinions, legal and risk management, and education resources. The perinatal focus of JPNN centers around labor and delivery and intrapartum services specifically and overall perinatal services broadly. The neonatal focus emphasizes neonatal intensive care and includes the spectrum of neonatal and infant care outcomes. Featured articles for JPNN include evidence-based reviews, innovative clinical programs and projects, clinical updates and education and research-related articles appropriate for registered and advanced practice nurses. The primary objective of The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing is to provide practicing nurses with useful information on perinatal and neonatal nursing. Each issue is PEER REVIEWED and will feature one topic, to be covered in depth. JPNN is a refereed journal. All manuscripts submitted for publication are peer reviewed by a minimum of three members of the editorial board. Manuscripts are evaluated on the basis of accuracy and relevance of content, fit with the journal purpose and upcoming issue topics, and writing style. Both clinical and research manuscripts applicable to perinatal and neonatal care are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
mHealth Service Effects for Negative Emotions Among Parents of Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. An Internet-Based Developmental Home Care Support Program Improved Maternal Psychological Symptoms and Infant Growth: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Depiction of Homemade Infant Formula and Formula Hacks on Pinterest: An Unsafe and Unhealthy Pin for Infants? The Effect of Baby Friendly Neonatal Intensive Care Initiative on Exclusive Breastfeeding Rates following Discharge in Very Preterm Infants. The Effect of Mother's Voice and Father's Voice Listened by Newborns During Heel Blood Collection on Pain Level and Physiological Parameters: A Randomized Controlled Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1