Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature.

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Human Reproduction Update Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmad028
Bart C J M Fauser, G David Adamson, Jacky Boivin, Georgina M Chambers, Christian de Geyter, Silke Dyer, Marcia C Inhorn, Lone Schmidt, Gamal I Serour, Basil Tarlatzis, Fernando Zegers-Hochschild
{"title":"Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature.","authors":"Bart C J M Fauser, G David Adamson, Jacky Boivin, Georgina M Chambers, Christian de Geyter, Silke Dyer, Marcia C Inhorn, Lone Schmidt, Gamal I Serour, Basil Tarlatzis, Fernando Zegers-Hochschild","doi":"10.1093/humupd/dmad028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family-planning policies have focused on contraceptive approaches to avoid unintended pregnancies, postpone, or terminate pregnancies and mitigate population growth. These policies have contributed to significantly slowing world population growth. Presently, half the countries worldwide exhibit a fertility rate below replacement level. Not including the effects of migration, many countries are predicted to have a population decline of >50% from 2017 to 2100, causing demographic changes with profound societal implications. Policies that optimize chances to have a child when desired increase fertility rates and are gaining interest as a family-building method. Increasingly, countries have implemented child-friendly policies (mainly financial incentives in addition to public funding of fertility treatment in a limited number of countries) to mitigate decreasing national populations. However, the extent of public spending on child benefits varies greatly from country to country. To our knowledge, this International Federation of Fertility Societies (IFFS) consensus document represents the first attempt to describe major disparities in access to fertility care in the context of the global trend of decreasing growth in the world population, based on a narrative review of the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Objective and rationale: </strong>The concept of family building, the process by which individuals or couples create or expand their families, has been largely ignored in family-planning paradigms. Family building encompasses various methods and options for individuals or couples who wish to have children. It can involve biological means, such as natural conception, as well as ART, surrogacy, adoption, and foster care. Family-building acknowledges the diverse ways in which individuals or couples can create their desired family and reflects the understanding that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to building a family. Developing education programs for young adults to increase family-building awareness and prevent infertility is urgently needed. Recommendations are provided and important knowledge gaps identified to provide professionals, the public, and policymakers with a comprehensive understanding of the role of child-friendly policies.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>A narrative review of the existing literature was performed by invited global leaders who themselves significantly contributed to this research field. Each section of the review was prepared by two to three experts, each of whom searched the published literature (PubMed) for peer reviewed full papers and reviews. Sections were discussed monthly by all authors and quarterly by the review board. The final document was prepared following discussions among all team members during a hybrid invitational meeting where full consensus was reached.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Major advances in fertility care have dramatically improved family-building opportunities since the 1990s. Although up to 10% of all children are born as a result of fertility care in some wealthy countries, there is great variation in access to care. The high cost to patients of infertility treatment renders it unaffordable for most. Preliminary studies point to the increasing contribution of fertility care to the global population and the associated economic benefits for society.</p><p><strong>Wider implications: </strong>Fertility care has rarely been discussed in the context of a rapid decrease in world population growth. Soon, most countries will have an average number of children per woman far below the replacement level. While this may have a beneficial impact on the environment, underpopulation is of great concern in many countries. Although governments have implemented child-friendly policies, distinct discrepancies in access to fertility care remain.</p>","PeriodicalId":55045,"journal":{"name":"Human Reproduction Update","volume":" ","pages":"153-173"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10905510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Reproduction Update","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmad028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family-planning policies have focused on contraceptive approaches to avoid unintended pregnancies, postpone, or terminate pregnancies and mitigate population growth. These policies have contributed to significantly slowing world population growth. Presently, half the countries worldwide exhibit a fertility rate below replacement level. Not including the effects of migration, many countries are predicted to have a population decline of >50% from 2017 to 2100, causing demographic changes with profound societal implications. Policies that optimize chances to have a child when desired increase fertility rates and are gaining interest as a family-building method. Increasingly, countries have implemented child-friendly policies (mainly financial incentives in addition to public funding of fertility treatment in a limited number of countries) to mitigate decreasing national populations. However, the extent of public spending on child benefits varies greatly from country to country. To our knowledge, this International Federation of Fertility Societies (IFFS) consensus document represents the first attempt to describe major disparities in access to fertility care in the context of the global trend of decreasing growth in the world population, based on a narrative review of the existing literature.

Objective and rationale: The concept of family building, the process by which individuals or couples create or expand their families, has been largely ignored in family-planning paradigms. Family building encompasses various methods and options for individuals or couples who wish to have children. It can involve biological means, such as natural conception, as well as ART, surrogacy, adoption, and foster care. Family-building acknowledges the diverse ways in which individuals or couples can create their desired family and reflects the understanding that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to building a family. Developing education programs for young adults to increase family-building awareness and prevent infertility is urgently needed. Recommendations are provided and important knowledge gaps identified to provide professionals, the public, and policymakers with a comprehensive understanding of the role of child-friendly policies.

Search methods: A narrative review of the existing literature was performed by invited global leaders who themselves significantly contributed to this research field. Each section of the review was prepared by two to three experts, each of whom searched the published literature (PubMed) for peer reviewed full papers and reviews. Sections were discussed monthly by all authors and quarterly by the review board. The final document was prepared following discussions among all team members during a hybrid invitational meeting where full consensus was reached.

Outcomes: Major advances in fertility care have dramatically improved family-building opportunities since the 1990s. Although up to 10% of all children are born as a result of fertility care in some wealthy countries, there is great variation in access to care. The high cost to patients of infertility treatment renders it unaffordable for most. Preliminary studies point to the increasing contribution of fertility care to the global population and the associated economic benefits for society.

Wider implications: Fertility care has rarely been discussed in the context of a rapid decrease in world population growth. Soon, most countries will have an average number of children per woman far below the replacement level. While this may have a beneficial impact on the environment, underpopulation is of great concern in many countries. Although governments have implemented child-friendly policies, distinct discrepancies in access to fertility care remain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球生育率下降及其对计划生育和家庭建设的影响:根据对文献的叙述性审查编写的森林论坛共识文件。
背景:计划生育政策侧重于避孕方法,以避免意外怀孕、推迟或终止妊娠以及减缓人口增长。这些政策大大减缓了世界人口的增长。目前,全世界有一半国家的生育率低于更替水平。如果不考虑移民的影响,预计从 2017 年到 2100 年,许多国家的人口将下降 50%以上,这将导致对社会产生深远影响的人口变化。优化生育机会的政策会提高生育率,并作为一种家庭建设方法受到越来越多的关注。越来越多的国家实施了有利于儿童的政策(主要是财政激励措施,少数国家还为生育治疗提供公共资金),以缓解国家人口减少的问题。然而,各国在儿童福利方面的公共开支差异很大。据我们所知,这份国际生育协会联合会(IFFS)共识文件是在对现有文献进行叙述性回顾的基础上,首次尝试描述在世界人口增长下降的全球趋势下,在获得生育保健方面存在的主要差异。目标和理由:家庭建设的概念是个人或夫妇创建或扩大家庭的过程,在计划生育范例中基本上被忽视了。家庭建设包括希望生育子女的个人或夫妇的各种方法和选择。它既包括自然受孕等生物学手段,也包括 ART、代孕、领养和寄养。家庭建设承认个人或夫妇可以通过不同的方式建立自己想要的家庭,并反映了这样一种认识,即建立家庭没有放之四海而皆准的方法。当务之急是为年轻人制定教育计划,以提高建立家庭的意识并预防不孕不育。本文提出了一些建议,并指出了重要的知识缺口,以便让专业人士、公众和政策制定者全面了解爱幼政策的作用:检索方法:邀请对该研究领域做出重大贡献的全球领导者对现有文献进行了叙述性综述。综述的每个部分都由两到三位专家准备,每位专家都在已发表的文献(PubMed)中搜索同行评审的完整论文和综述。所有作者每月讨论一次,评审委员会每季度讨论一次。在一次混合邀请会议上,所有小组成员进行了讨论,并达成了完全一致的意见,随后编写了最终文件:自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,生育护理方面的重大进步极大地改善了建立家庭的机会。尽管在一些富裕国家,有高达 10%的儿童是通过生育护理出生的,但在获得护理方面却存在很大差异。不孕不育治疗的高昂费用使大多数患者负担不起。初步研究表明,生育保健对全球人口的贡献越来越大,并为社会带来了相关的经济效益:生育保健很少在世界人口增长迅速下降的背景下进行讨论。很快,大多数国家每名妇女的平均子女数将远远低于更替水平。虽然这可能会对环境产生有利影响,但许多国家都非常担心人口不足的问题。尽管各国政府已经实施了关爱儿童的政策,但在获得生育护理方面仍存在明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Reproduction Update
Human Reproduction Update 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
28.80
自引率
1.50%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction Update is the leading journal in its field, boasting a Journal Impact FactorTM of 13.3 and ranked first in Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (Source: Journal Citation ReportsTM from Clarivate, 2023). It specializes in publishing comprehensive and systematic review articles covering various aspects of human reproductive physiology and medicine. The journal prioritizes basic, transitional, and clinical topics related to reproduction, encompassing areas such as andrology, embryology, infertility, gynaecology, pregnancy, reproductive endocrinology, reproductive epidemiology, reproductive genetics, reproductive immunology, and reproductive oncology. Human Reproduction Update is published on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), maintaining the highest scientific and editorial standards.
期刊最新文献
Defects in mRNA splicing and implications for infertility: a comprehensive review and in silico analysis. Parental conditions, modifiable lifestyle factors, and first trimester growth and development: a systematic review. Fertility in transgender and gender diverse people: systematic review of the effects of gender-affirming hormones on reproductive organs and fertility Functional hypothalamic amenorrhoea and polycystic ovarian morphology: a narrative review about an intriguing association. Celebrating 30 years at Human Reproduction Update.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1