{"title":"Role of demographics in noninvasive testing for colorectal cancer screening: do targeted cut-off values improve detection?","authors":"Inayat Gill, Christienne Shams, Angy Hanna, Julie George, Laith H Jamil, Atulkumar Patel","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5985.22.03124-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a yearly alternative colorectal screening modality for average risk individuals unwilling or unable to undergo invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening due to cost and accessibility. This study aimed to determine whether FIT should be interpreted within the context of patient demographics and medical history.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients >50 years old who had a FIT followed by colonoscopy within 1 year were analyzed based on age, race, BMI, social and medical comorbidities. False positive (FP) and false negative (FN) FIT results within each patient demographic and medical history variable were determined by comparing with the gold standard of colonoscopy using χ<sup>2</sup> analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand twenty-five patients were reviewed. 21.8% of FIT results were positive. Factors which differed in positive FIT rates were age (P=0.003), smoking (P<0.001), alcohol (P=0.001), and hypertension (P<0.001). The difference in rates of FP and FN FIT outcomes among each variable underwent further subanalysis. The FP was 66.8% and the FN rate was 12.8%. Higher FN outcomes were noted in those above 70, males and smokers, though the result was only statistically significant for males (P=0.009). Females were observed to have higher FP rates (P=0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Females had higher FP FIT rates compared to males, indicating that sex may influence FIT outcomes and should be accounted for when interpreting FIT results. This information can be utilized to identify populations at higher risk of FP or FN FIT results to target CRC screening. Additionally, recalculating the FP and FN rates for each variable may help determine new FIT targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":94142,"journal":{"name":"Minerva gastroenterology","volume":"69 4","pages":"459-469"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5985.22.03124-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a yearly alternative colorectal screening modality for average risk individuals unwilling or unable to undergo invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening due to cost and accessibility. This study aimed to determine whether FIT should be interpreted within the context of patient demographics and medical history.
Methods: Patients >50 years old who had a FIT followed by colonoscopy within 1 year were analyzed based on age, race, BMI, social and medical comorbidities. False positive (FP) and false negative (FN) FIT results within each patient demographic and medical history variable were determined by comparing with the gold standard of colonoscopy using χ2 analysis.
Results: One thousand twenty-five patients were reviewed. 21.8% of FIT results were positive. Factors which differed in positive FIT rates were age (P=0.003), smoking (P<0.001), alcohol (P=0.001), and hypertension (P<0.001). The difference in rates of FP and FN FIT outcomes among each variable underwent further subanalysis. The FP was 66.8% and the FN rate was 12.8%. Higher FN outcomes were noted in those above 70, males and smokers, though the result was only statistically significant for males (P=0.009). Females were observed to have higher FP rates (P=0.019).
Conclusions: Females had higher FP FIT rates compared to males, indicating that sex may influence FIT outcomes and should be accounted for when interpreting FIT results. This information can be utilized to identify populations at higher risk of FP or FN FIT results to target CRC screening. Additionally, recalculating the FP and FN rates for each variable may help determine new FIT targets.
背景:粪便免疫化学检验(FIT)是每年一次的结直肠癌筛查替代方法,适用于因费用和可及性问题而不愿或无法接受侵入性结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的一般风险人群。本研究旨在确定是否应根据患者的人口统计学特征和病史来解释 FIT:根据年龄、种族、体重指数、社会和医疗合并症对年龄大于 50 岁、在 1 年内做过 FIT 和结肠镜检查的患者进行了分析。通过与结肠镜检查金标准进行χ2分析,确定每个患者人口统计学和病史变量中的假阳性(FP)和假阴性(FN)FIT结果:对125名患者进行了复查。21.8%的 FIT 结果呈阳性。导致 FIT 阳性率不同的因素有年龄(P=0.003)、吸烟(P=0.002)、性别(P=0.003)、年龄(P=0.003)和性别(P=0.002):与男性相比,女性的 FP FIT 率更高,这表明性别可能会影响 FIT 结果,在解释 FIT 结果时应考虑到这一点。可以利用这一信息来确定FP或FN FIT结果风险较高的人群,从而有针对性地进行CRC筛查。此外,重新计算每个变量的 FP 和 FN 率可能有助于确定新的 FIT 目标。