A conversation analytic investigation into displays of expertise of different tutors in small group clinical skills training

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Linguistics and Education Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.linged.2023.101264
Meral Demirören , Merve Bozbıyık , Sevgi Turan
{"title":"A conversation analytic investigation into displays of expertise of different tutors in small group clinical skills training","authors":"Meral Demirören ,&nbsp;Merve Bozbıyık ,&nbsp;Sevgi Turan","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2023.101264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Clinical skills training requires a comprehensive understanding of how tutors demonstrate their knowledge, and fulfil their tutoring practices in medical education<span>. This study aims to investigate expertise demonstration of different tutors following students' requests for information during clinical skills training. For this purpose, video recordings of the suturing skill training provided by three different tutors (medical expert, research assistant, and near-peer tutor) were analysed through Conversation Analysis. The findings show that medical expert showcases expertise knowledge through different practices such as using directives and providing assessments while the research assistant takes a more collaborative approach, involving peers in the learning process. The study also indicates that the near-peer tutor employs concise and less informative utterances, refrains from giving direct feedback. This research offers valuable insights into how tutors display expertise by documenting various interactional practices in clinical skills training, and providing data-driven implications for professional training programs in medical education.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 101264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589823001237","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical skills training requires a comprehensive understanding of how tutors demonstrate their knowledge, and fulfil their tutoring practices in medical education. This study aims to investigate expertise demonstration of different tutors following students' requests for information during clinical skills training. For this purpose, video recordings of the suturing skill training provided by three different tutors (medical expert, research assistant, and near-peer tutor) were analysed through Conversation Analysis. The findings show that medical expert showcases expertise knowledge through different practices such as using directives and providing assessments while the research assistant takes a more collaborative approach, involving peers in the learning process. The study also indicates that the near-peer tutor employs concise and less informative utterances, refrains from giving direct feedback. This research offers valuable insights into how tutors display expertise by documenting various interactional practices in clinical skills training, and providing data-driven implications for professional training programs in medical education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对小组临床技能培训中不同导师的专业知识展示进行会话分析调查
临床技能培训需要全面了解导师如何展示其知识,并在医学教育中履行其导师职责。本研究旨在调查不同导师在临床技能培训中应学生要求展示专业知识的情况。为此,研究人员通过会话分析法对三位不同导师(医学专家、研究助理和近距离导师)提供的缝合技能培训录像进行了分析。研究结果表明,医学专家通过使用指令和提供评估等不同做法来展示专业知识,而研究助理则采取更具协作性的方法,让同伴参与学习过程。研究还表明,近距离辅导员使用简洁、信息量较少的话语,避免提供直接反馈。这项研究通过记录临床技能培训中的各种互动实践,为导师如何展示专业知识提供了宝贵的见解,并为医学教育中的专业培训项目提供了数据驱动的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Linguistics and Education encourages submissions that apply theory and method from all areas of linguistics to the study of education. Areas of linguistic study include, but are not limited to: text/corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, functional grammar, discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, conversational analysis, linguistic anthropology/ethnography, language acquisition, language socialization, narrative studies, gesture/ sign /visual forms of communication, cognitive linguistics, literacy studies, language policy, and language ideology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Language as a distinguishing feature or common ground? A participatory study on manifestations of intergroup relations in the lived experiences of multilingual students. Promoting humanizing, meaningful, and just language instruction for multilingual learners and their peers: A pedagogical vision illustrated by examples from practice Encouraging translanguaging in collaborative talk in EFL classrooms: An epistemic network comparative study Grammatical and rhetorical reasoning in upper secondary students’ collaborative talk about a literary text
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1