Investment and Innovation in Emerging Versus Advanced Market Economies: a Schumpeterian Approach

IF 4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of the Knowledge Economy Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1007/s13132-023-01681-3
Gerasimos Lianos, Igor Sloev
{"title":"Investment and Innovation in Emerging Versus Advanced Market Economies: a Schumpeterian Approach","authors":"Gerasimos Lianos, Igor Sloev","doi":"10.1007/s13132-023-01681-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We present empirical evidence that emerging market economies innovate less while they invest more than advanced market economies. We present empirical evidence that innovative activities in both advanced and emerging market economies are most hampered by financial and economic cost factors. To explain the differences in the innovation activity between emerging and advanced market economies, we use two variants of a Schumpeterian model of creative destruction: a variant with complete financial markets and another with incomplete financial markets and uninsurable shocks to the innovation activity and we identify the first with an advanced market economy and the second with an emerging market economy. We characterize the effects of macroeconomic, financial, and industrial factors on the innovation-to-maintenance mix in advanced versus emerging market economies. Economic recessions induce innovation in advanced market economies; however, their effect in emerging markets depends on the underlying parameters of the shock process. In both advanced and emerging market economies, uncertainty induces greater innovation. Borrowing capacity increases innovation in emerging market economies. Industrial competition decreases innovation in emerging market economies, though it is neutral in advanced market economies. In emerging market economies, it is the relative magnitudes of industrial competition and borrowing capacity that matter for innovation. The analysis suggests a different framework for public policy in which industrial competition policy and public financial policy are intertwined.</p>","PeriodicalId":47435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01681-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present empirical evidence that emerging market economies innovate less while they invest more than advanced market economies. We present empirical evidence that innovative activities in both advanced and emerging market economies are most hampered by financial and economic cost factors. To explain the differences in the innovation activity between emerging and advanced market economies, we use two variants of a Schumpeterian model of creative destruction: a variant with complete financial markets and another with incomplete financial markets and uninsurable shocks to the innovation activity and we identify the first with an advanced market economy and the second with an emerging market economy. We characterize the effects of macroeconomic, financial, and industrial factors on the innovation-to-maintenance mix in advanced versus emerging market economies. Economic recessions induce innovation in advanced market economies; however, their effect in emerging markets depends on the underlying parameters of the shock process. In both advanced and emerging market economies, uncertainty induces greater innovation. Borrowing capacity increases innovation in emerging market economies. Industrial competition decreases innovation in emerging market economies, though it is neutral in advanced market economies. In emerging market economies, it is the relative magnitudes of industrial competition and borrowing capacity that matter for innovation. The analysis suggests a different framework for public policy in which industrial competition policy and public financial policy are intertwined.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新兴市场经济体与发达市场经济体的投资与创新:熊彼得方法
我们提出的经验证据表明,与发达市场经济体相比,新兴市场经济体的创新较少,但投资较多。我们提出的经验证据表明,发达市场经济体和新兴市场经济体的创新活动受金融和经济成本因素的阻碍最大。为了解释新兴市场经济体和发达市场经济体在创新活动方面的差异,我们使用了熊彼特创造性破坏模型的两个变体:一个变体具有完整的金融市场,另一个变体具有不完整的金融市场,并且创新活动受到不可保险的冲击,我们将前者与发达市场经济体相提并论,将后者与新兴市场经济体相提并论。我们描述了宏观经济、金融和产业因素对先进市场经济体和新兴市场经济体的创新与维护组合的影响。在发达市场经济体中,经济衰退会诱发创新;但在新兴市场经济体中,经济衰退的影响取决于冲击过程的基本参数。无论是发达市场经济体还是新兴市场经济体,不确定性都会诱发更大的创新。借贷能力增加了新兴市场经济体的创新。产业竞争会降低新兴市场经济体的创新能力,但对发达市场经济体的影响是中性的。在新兴市场经济体中,产业竞争和借贷能力的相对大小对创新至关重要。分析提出了一个不同的公共政策框架,其中产业竞争政策和公共财政政策相互交织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
27.30%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: In the context of rapid globalization and technological capacity, the world’s economies today are driven increasingly by knowledge—the expertise, skills, experience, education, understanding, awareness, perception, and other qualities required to communicate, interpret, and analyze information. New wealth is created by the application of knowledge to improve productivity—and to create new products, services, systems, and process (i.e., to innovate). The Journal of the Knowledge Economy focuses on the dynamics of the knowledge-based economy, with an emphasis on the role of knowledge creation, diffusion, and application across three economic levels: (1) the systemic ''meta'' or ''macro''-level, (2) the organizational ''meso''-level, and (3) the individual ''micro''-level. The journal incorporates insights from the fields of economics, management, law, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and political science to shed new light on the evolving role of knowledge, with a particular emphasis on how innovation can be leveraged to provide solutions to complex problems and issues, including global crises in environmental sustainability, education, and economic development. Articles emphasize empirical studies, underscoring a comparative approach, and, to a lesser extent, case studies and theoretical articles. The journal balances practice/application and theory/concepts.
期刊最新文献
An Engagement Between Faculty Adeptness, Learner’s Expectations, Usage of Technology, and Perceived Learner’s Learning Outcome: Mediating Role of Emotional Intelligence Impact of Mobile Money on Resilience to Health Shocks in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Togo The Fishing and Aquaculture Production of Latin America with Respect to the Trade Balance and Foreign Investment Effects of ICTs on Labor Productivity: A Re-examination of Solow’s Paradox Through the Prism of the Joint Use of ICT Tools in Cameroonian Firms Career Imprints from Diverse Institutional Settings: a Comparative Study of Academic and Non-academic Partnered Ventures in Technopolis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1