Televising Talent: Musicality, Meritocracy, and the Aesthetics of Exclusion

IF 0.2 1区 艺术学 0 MUSIC Journal of the Society for American Music Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1017/s1752196323000421
Lindsay J. Wright
{"title":"Televising Talent: Musicality, Meritocracy, and the Aesthetics of Exclusion","authors":"Lindsay J. Wright","doi":"10.1017/s1752196323000421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Throughout the history of television, American audiences have participated in a tradition of programs that follow a consistent structure: Amateur musicians and entertainers are offered an opportunity to display their talent on stage, competing for audience votes to win first prize and a chance at stardom. This article contributes to a growing literature on the significance of televised talent shows, demonstrating how their remarkable longevity and representational power stems from their configuration as a “format,” the set of guidelines that structure and constrain the content of each broadcast—an aesthetic process grounded in exclusion. Through their formatting, I argue, these programs reify the notion of “talent” at the heart of talent shows, transforming a multidimensional and context-contingent assemblage of musical abilities into a seemingly stable object able to be recognized, rated, and ranked. Musical auditions offer a microcosm of formatting's role as a means of training audiences’ attention. They normalize the practice of eliminating whatever (or whomever) is deemed unworthy—on these programs and in the wider world. Through analyzing examples from Ted Mack and the Original Amateur Hour (1948), The Gong Show (1978), and The Voice (2017), the article demonstrates how beneath the widely discussed content of contestant demographics, judge commentary, or audience voting results, the talent show format serves to obscure the contradictions upon which meritocracy's cruel optimism rests.</p>","PeriodicalId":42557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for American Music","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for American Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1752196323000421","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Throughout the history of television, American audiences have participated in a tradition of programs that follow a consistent structure: Amateur musicians and entertainers are offered an opportunity to display their talent on stage, competing for audience votes to win first prize and a chance at stardom. This article contributes to a growing literature on the significance of televised talent shows, demonstrating how their remarkable longevity and representational power stems from their configuration as a “format,” the set of guidelines that structure and constrain the content of each broadcast—an aesthetic process grounded in exclusion. Through their formatting, I argue, these programs reify the notion of “talent” at the heart of talent shows, transforming a multidimensional and context-contingent assemblage of musical abilities into a seemingly stable object able to be recognized, rated, and ranked. Musical auditions offer a microcosm of formatting's role as a means of training audiences’ attention. They normalize the practice of eliminating whatever (or whomever) is deemed unworthy—on these programs and in the wider world. Through analyzing examples from Ted Mack and the Original Amateur Hour (1948), The Gong Show (1978), and The Voice (2017), the article demonstrates how beneath the widely discussed content of contestant demographics, judge commentary, or audience voting results, the talent show format serves to obscure the contradictions upon which meritocracy's cruel optimism rests.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电视转播人才:音乐性、功利和排斥美学
纵观电视发展史,美国观众参与节目的传统结构始终如一:业余音乐家和艺人有机会在舞台上展示自己的才华,争夺观众的选票,赢得一等奖和成名的机会。这篇文章为越来越多的关于电视选秀节目意义的文献做出了贡献,证明了这些节目的非凡寿命和代表性是如何源于它们作为一种 "格式 "的配置,即一套结构化和限制每场广播内容的准则--一种基于排斥的审美过程。我认为,通过格式化,这些节目重塑了选秀节目核心的 "才艺 "概念,将多维的、与环境相适应的音乐能力组合转化为一个看似稳定的、能够被识别、评级和排名的对象。音乐选秀是格式化作为训练观众注意力的手段的一个缩影。在这些节目和更广阔的世界中,它们将淘汰任何(或任何人)被认为不值得的东西的做法常态化。通过分析《泰德-麦克与原创业余时间》(1948 年)、《宫》(1978 年)和《好声音》(2017 年)中的例子,文章展示了在被广泛讨论的选手人口统计、评委评论或观众投票结果等内容之下,选秀节目的形式如何掩盖了功利主义残酷乐观主义所依赖的矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
Binational Indianism in James DeMars’s Guadalupe, Our Lady of the Roses Joshua McCarter Simpson's Songs and Mid-Nineteenth Century Antislavery Activism Opera and Land: Settler Colonialism and the Geopolitics of Music at the Carlisle Indian Industrial School Heitor Villa-Lobos and the Traces of Coloniality in Andrés Segovia's Guitar Repertoire Bernice Johnson Reagon's Musical Coalition Politics, 1966–81
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1