Cannabis use and trauma-focused treatment for co-occurring posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis of individual patient data

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Anxiety Disorders Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102827
Melanie L. Hill , Alexander C. Kline , Tanya C. Saraiya , Jordan Gette , Lesia M. Ruglass , Sonya B. Norman , Sudie E. Back , Lissette M. Saavedra , Denise A. Hien , Antonio A. Morgan-López
{"title":"Cannabis use and trauma-focused treatment for co-occurring posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis of individual patient data","authors":"Melanie L. Hill ,&nbsp;Alexander C. Kline ,&nbsp;Tanya C. Saraiya ,&nbsp;Jordan Gette ,&nbsp;Lesia M. Ruglass ,&nbsp;Sonya B. Norman ,&nbsp;Sudie E. Back ,&nbsp;Lissette M. Saavedra ,&nbsp;Denise A. Hien ,&nbsp;Antonio A. Morgan-López","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>High rates of cannabis use<span> among people with posttraumatic stress disorder<span><span> (PTSD) have raised questions about the efficacy of evidence-based PTSD treatments for individuals reporting cannabis use, particularly those with co-occurring alcohol or other substance use disorders (SUDs). Using a subset of four </span>randomized clinical trials (RCTs) included in </span></span></span><em>Project Harmony</em>, an individual patient meta-analysis of 36 RCTs (total N = 4046) of treatments for co-occurring PTSD+SUD, we examined differences in trauma-focused (TF) and non-trauma-focused (non-TF) treatment outcomes for individuals who did and did not endorse baseline cannabis use (N = 410; 70% male; 33.2% endorsed cannabis use). Propensity score-weighted mixed effects modeling evaluated main and interactive effects of treatment assignment (TF versus non-TF) and baseline cannabis use (yes/no) on attendance rates and within-treatment changes in PTSD, alcohol, and non-cannabis drug use severity. Results revealed significant improvements across outcomes among participants in all conditions, with larger PTSD symptom reductions but lower attendance among individuals receiving TF versus non-TF treatment in both cannabis groups. Participants achieved similar reductions in alcohol and drug use across all conditions. TF outperformed non-TF treatments regardless of recent cannabis use, underscoring the importance of reducing barriers to accessing TF treatments for individuals reporting cannabis use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 102827"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618524000033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High rates of cannabis use among people with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have raised questions about the efficacy of evidence-based PTSD treatments for individuals reporting cannabis use, particularly those with co-occurring alcohol or other substance use disorders (SUDs). Using a subset of four randomized clinical trials (RCTs) included in Project Harmony, an individual patient meta-analysis of 36 RCTs (total N = 4046) of treatments for co-occurring PTSD+SUD, we examined differences in trauma-focused (TF) and non-trauma-focused (non-TF) treatment outcomes for individuals who did and did not endorse baseline cannabis use (N = 410; 70% male; 33.2% endorsed cannabis use). Propensity score-weighted mixed effects modeling evaluated main and interactive effects of treatment assignment (TF versus non-TF) and baseline cannabis use (yes/no) on attendance rates and within-treatment changes in PTSD, alcohol, and non-cannabis drug use severity. Results revealed significant improvements across outcomes among participants in all conditions, with larger PTSD symptom reductions but lower attendance among individuals receiving TF versus non-TF treatment in both cannabis groups. Participants achieved similar reductions in alcohol and drug use across all conditions. TF outperformed non-TF treatments regardless of recent cannabis use, underscoring the importance of reducing barriers to accessing TF treatments for individuals reporting cannabis use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大麻的使用和针对创伤后应激障碍和药物使用障碍并发症的以创伤为重点的治疗:个体患者数据的荟萃分析
创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者吸食大麻的比例很高,这引发了人们对以证据为基础的创伤后应激障碍治疗方法对报告吸食大麻者的疗效的质疑,尤其是那些同时患有酒精或其他药物使用障碍(SUDs)的患者。和谐项目是对 36 项有关创伤后应激障碍+SUD 并发症治疗的随机临床试验(RCT)(总人数 = 4,046 人)进行的个体患者荟萃分析,我们利用和谐项目中包含的四项随机临床试验(RCT)中的一个子集,研究了对于认可和不认可基线大麻使用(人数 = 410 人;70% 为男性;33.2% 认可大麻使用)的个体,以创伤为中心(TF)和不以创伤为中心(non-TF)治疗结果的差异。倾向得分加权混合效应模型评估了治疗分配(TF 与非 TF)和基线大麻使用(是/否)对出勤率以及创伤后应激障碍、酒精和非大麻药物使用严重程度的治疗内变化的主要效应和交互效应。结果显示,在所有条件下,参与者的各项结果均有明显改善,在两组大麻治疗中,接受 TF 治疗的人与未接受 TF 治疗的人相比,创伤后应激障碍症状减轻幅度更大,但出勤率更低。在所有情况下,参与者的酒精和毒品使用量都有类似的减少。无论最近是否吸食大麻,TF 治疗的效果都优于非 TF 治疗,这突出表明了减少报告吸食大麻者获得 TF 治疗的障碍的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Metacognitive therapy versus exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder – a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial” Journal of Anxiety Disorders (2024), Volume 104, June 2024, 102873 Excessive avoidance bias towards uncertain faces in non-clinical social anxiety individuals Interplay of serum BDNF levels and childhood adversity in predicting earlier-onset post-traumatic stress disorder: A two-year longitudinal study Negative emotion differentiation buffers against intergenerational risk for social anxiety in at-risk adolescent girls Intensive treatments for children and adolescents with anxiety or obsessive-compulsive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1