Does public information facilitate price consensus? Characterizing USDA announcement effects using realized volatility

IF 3.7 4区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Commodity Markets Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomm.2024.100382
Gabriel D. Bunek , Joseph P. Janzen
{"title":"Does public information facilitate price consensus? Characterizing USDA announcement effects using realized volatility","authors":"Gabriel D. Bunek ,&nbsp;Joseph P. Janzen","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomm.2024.100382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The provision of public information in commodity markets is justified in part by the idea that public information generates consensus among market participants about the fundamental value of the commodity and reduces price volatility. Significant reductions in options-implied volatility following report releases have been presented as evidence of this market-calming effect. We scrutinize this finding in more detail by comparing implied volatility to realized volatility measures from intraday price data. We show that while implied volatility does indeed fall after report releases, realized volatility does not decrease. We measure realized volatility using intraday data and find evidence of much higher volatility on report days only within minutes of the report release. This pattern is consistent with changes in implied volatility being driven by the resolution of uncertainty about the information contained in the report, rather than changes in volatility expectations that may reflect the consensus among traders about forthcoming price volatility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commodity Markets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851324000011/pdfft?md5=ac63b20f58d7dc6cbbdb1b44afa526c0&pid=1-s2.0-S2405851324000011-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commodity Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851324000011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The provision of public information in commodity markets is justified in part by the idea that public information generates consensus among market participants about the fundamental value of the commodity and reduces price volatility. Significant reductions in options-implied volatility following report releases have been presented as evidence of this market-calming effect. We scrutinize this finding in more detail by comparing implied volatility to realized volatility measures from intraday price data. We show that while implied volatility does indeed fall after report releases, realized volatility does not decrease. We measure realized volatility using intraday data and find evidence of much higher volatility on report days only within minutes of the report release. This pattern is consistent with changes in implied volatility being driven by the resolution of uncertainty about the information contained in the report, rather than changes in volatility expectations that may reflect the consensus among traders about forthcoming price volatility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共信息是否有助于达成价格共识?利用已实现波动率描述 USDA 公告效应
在商品市场上提供公共信息的部分理由是,公共信息能使市场参与者对商品的基本价值达成共识,并减少价格波动。报告发布后期权隐含波动率的显著下降就是这种市场镇定效应的证据。我们通过比较隐含波动率和来自日内价格数据的已实现波动率,对这一发现进行了更详细的研究。我们发现,虽然隐含波动率在报告发布后确实会下降,但已实现波动率并没有减少。我们使用盘中数据来衡量已实现波动率,发现有证据表明,报告日的波动率在报告发布后几分钟内就会大幅上升。这种模式与隐含波动率的变化一致,即隐含波动率的变化是由报告所含信息的不确定性的解决所驱动的,而不是波动率预期的变化,后者可能反映了交易者对未来价格波动的共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal is also to stimulate international dialog among academics, industry participants, traders, investors, and policymakers with mutual interests in commodity markets. The mandate for the journal is to present ongoing work within commodity economics and finance. Topics can be related to financialization of commodity markets; pricing, hedging, and risk analysis of commodity derivatives; risk premia in commodity markets; real option analysis for commodity project investment and production; portfolio allocation including commodities; forecasting in commodity markets; corporate finance for commodity-exposed corporations; econometric/statistical analysis of commodity markets; organization of commodity markets; regulation of commodity markets; local and global commodity trading; and commodity supply chains. Commodity markets in this context are energy markets (including renewables), metal markets, mineral markets, agricultural markets, livestock and fish markets, markets for weather derivatives, emission markets, shipping markets, water, and related markets. This interdisciplinary and trans-disciplinary journal will cover all commodity markets and is thus relevant for a broad audience. Commodity markets are not only of academic interest but also highly relevant for many practitioners, including asset managers, industrial managers, investment bankers, risk managers, and also policymakers in governments, central banks, and supranational institutions.
期刊最新文献
Importance of geopolitical risk in volatility structure: New evidence from biofuels, crude oil, and grains commodity markets Expected returns on commodity ETFs and their underlying assets The role of news sentiment in salmon price prediction using deep learning When Chinese mania meets global frenzy: Commodity price bubbles Do oil market shocks affect financial distress? Evidence from firm-level global data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1