Grid-based assessment of hydrogen leakages for an offshore process to improve the design and human performance

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Process Safety Progress Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI:10.1002/prs.12567
Asher Ahmed Malik, Risza Rusli, Salman Nazir, Rizal Harris Wong, Ushtar Arshad
{"title":"Grid-based assessment of hydrogen leakages for an offshore process to improve the design and human performance","authors":"Asher Ahmed Malik, Risza Rusli, Salman Nazir, Rizal Harris Wong, Ushtar Arshad","doi":"10.1002/prs.12567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydrogen is gaining global recognition as a sustainable energy source, but its combustible nature raises concerns, especially in congested offshore settings. Steam methane reforming (SMR) remains the predominant hydrogen production method; however, offshore SMR facilities exposed to harsh weather could potentially compromise safety because of leakages. This study uses the fire dynamics simulator (FDS) to carry out the first-of-its-kind CFD modeling of hydrogen leakage and its wind-influenced dispersion on an offshore SMR platform. It also provides the spatial risk that accounts for the probabilities of human errors and wind speeds. The study uses a grid-based approach with 120 monitor points (MPs) to measure locally dispersed gas concentration. At 2 m/s wind speed, only nine grids contain explosive concentrations while the rest remain safe. At 5 m/s, the flammable zones increase by 133%, affecting 21 grids. Extreme wind speeds of 12.5 m/s have limited impact, but SMR1 exhibits higher stoichiometric concentrations. MPs 43–48 record flammable concentrations at all wind speeds; however, at 12.5 m/s the explosion risk is well below the threshold of 1 × 10<sup>−4</sup> due to the low wind occurrence probability. Overall, this research contributes to addressing the safety concerns associated with hydrogen in offshore settings and provides a foundation for future risk assessments.","PeriodicalId":20680,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12567","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrogen is gaining global recognition as a sustainable energy source, but its combustible nature raises concerns, especially in congested offshore settings. Steam methane reforming (SMR) remains the predominant hydrogen production method; however, offshore SMR facilities exposed to harsh weather could potentially compromise safety because of leakages. This study uses the fire dynamics simulator (FDS) to carry out the first-of-its-kind CFD modeling of hydrogen leakage and its wind-influenced dispersion on an offshore SMR platform. It also provides the spatial risk that accounts for the probabilities of human errors and wind speeds. The study uses a grid-based approach with 120 monitor points (MPs) to measure locally dispersed gas concentration. At 2 m/s wind speed, only nine grids contain explosive concentrations while the rest remain safe. At 5 m/s, the flammable zones increase by 133%, affecting 21 grids. Extreme wind speeds of 12.5 m/s have limited impact, but SMR1 exhibits higher stoichiometric concentrations. MPs 43–48 record flammable concentrations at all wind speeds; however, at 12.5 m/s the explosion risk is well below the threshold of 1 × 10−4 due to the low wind occurrence probability. Overall, this research contributes to addressing the safety concerns associated with hydrogen in offshore settings and provides a foundation for future risk assessments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于网格的近海工艺氢泄漏评估,以改进设计和人的表现
氢作为一种可持续能源正得到全球的认可,但其可燃性引起了人们的担忧,尤其是在拥挤的近海环境中。蒸汽甲烷重整(SMR)仍然是最主要的制氢方法;然而,暴露在恶劣天气下的近海 SMR 设施可能会因泄漏而危及安全。本研究使用火灾动力学模拟器(FDS)对海上 SMR 平台的氢气泄漏及其受风影响的扩散进行了首次 CFD 建模。它还提供了考虑到人为失误概率和风速的空间风险。该研究采用基于网格的方法,通过 120 个监测点 (MP) 来测量局部扩散的气体浓度。风速为 2 米/秒时,只有 9 个网格含有爆炸浓度,其余网格仍然安全。风速为 5 米/秒时,易燃区增加了 133%,影响到 21 个网格。12.5 米/秒的极端风速影响有限,但 SMR1 显示出更高的化学计量浓度。第 43-48 号重大计划在所有风速下都记录了可燃浓度;然而,在 12.5 米/秒时,由于风速发生概率较低,爆炸风险远低于 1 × 10-4 的阈值。总之,这项研究有助于解决近海环境中与氢有关的安全问题,并为未来的风险评估奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Process Safety Progress
Process Safety Progress 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Process Safety Progress covers process safety for engineering professionals. It addresses such topics as incident investigations/case histories, hazardous chemicals management, hazardous leaks prevention, risk assessment, process hazards evaluation, industrial hygiene, fire and explosion analysis, preventive maintenance, vapor cloud dispersion, and regulatory compliance, training, education, and other areas in process safety and loss prevention, including emerging concerns like plant and/or process security. Papers from the annual Loss Prevention Symposium and other AIChE safety conferences are automatically considered for publication, but unsolicited papers, particularly those addressing process safety issues in emerging technologies and industries are encouraged and evaluated equally.
期刊最新文献
Numerical study of failure modes of hazardous material tanks exposed to fire accidents in the process industry So, you cannot vent: A deep dive into other explosion protection methods Risk and consequence analysis of ammonia storage units in a nuclear fuel cycle facility Diagnosing electrostatic problems and hazards in industrial processes: Case studies Numerical simulation study on propane gas leakage and diffusion law in slope terrain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1