Interdisciplinary network care collaboration in Parkinson's disease: a baseline evaluation in Germany.

IF 3.2 Q2 Medicine Neurological research and practice Pub Date : 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1186/s42466-023-00300-5
Carina Lummer, Carsten Eggers, Andreas Becker, Fenja Demandt, Tobias Warnecke
{"title":"Interdisciplinary network care collaboration in Parkinson's disease: a baseline evaluation in Germany.","authors":"Carina Lummer, Carsten Eggers, Andreas Becker, Fenja Demandt, Tobias Warnecke","doi":"10.1186/s42466-023-00300-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The strengthening of interdisciplinary care collaboration in Parkinson's disease is taking on increasing importance in daily medical routine. Therefore, care providers worldwide are organizing themselves in disease-specific regional network structures. However, the existing networks are heterogeneous, and the driving key players are yet unidentified.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To systematically identify key factors of the composition of health care professionals, who are initially interested in the development of a Parkinson network for interdisciplinary care collaboration, their motivation, and expectations, we conducted a basic evaluation in three different German regions covering a total number of 23,405 people with Parkinson's.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A specially developed semi-open questionnaire focusing on socio-demographic information, ways of contact, interdisciplinary collaboration, and connectedness was used. Statistical analyses were performed based on a predesigned codebook.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most crucial professions were outpatient therapists (physio-, occupational-, speech therapists) (36.7%), average case load of 10.1 patients/3 months and inpatient movement disorder specialists (21.1%), average case load of 197.4 patients/3 months. Before implementation of PD networks, 48.9% of outpatient therapists did not have any contact with neurologists. 58.9% of caregivers considered the current frequency of collaboration to be insufficient. The lack of political support as well as a lack of time were identified as main hurdles to increased collaboration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The identified driving forces in strengthened care collaboration are assigned to different healthcare sectors. This makes networks which provide tools for specialized education and interdisciplinary, cross-sectoral communication indispensable. For an areawide rollout, a rethinking of political frameworks towards network care is strongly necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":94156,"journal":{"name":"Neurological research and practice","volume":"6 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10782567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-023-00300-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The strengthening of interdisciplinary care collaboration in Parkinson's disease is taking on increasing importance in daily medical routine. Therefore, care providers worldwide are organizing themselves in disease-specific regional network structures. However, the existing networks are heterogeneous, and the driving key players are yet unidentified.

Objectives: To systematically identify key factors of the composition of health care professionals, who are initially interested in the development of a Parkinson network for interdisciplinary care collaboration, their motivation, and expectations, we conducted a basic evaluation in three different German regions covering a total number of 23,405 people with Parkinson's.

Methods: A specially developed semi-open questionnaire focusing on socio-demographic information, ways of contact, interdisciplinary collaboration, and connectedness was used. Statistical analyses were performed based on a predesigned codebook.

Results: The most crucial professions were outpatient therapists (physio-, occupational-, speech therapists) (36.7%), average case load of 10.1 patients/3 months and inpatient movement disorder specialists (21.1%), average case load of 197.4 patients/3 months. Before implementation of PD networks, 48.9% of outpatient therapists did not have any contact with neurologists. 58.9% of caregivers considered the current frequency of collaboration to be insufficient. The lack of political support as well as a lack of time were identified as main hurdles to increased collaboration.

Conclusion: The identified driving forces in strengthened care collaboration are assigned to different healthcare sectors. This makes networks which provide tools for specialized education and interdisciplinary, cross-sectoral communication indispensable. For an areawide rollout, a rethinking of political frameworks towards network care is strongly necessary.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帕金森病的跨学科网络护理合作:德国的基线评估。
背景:在日常医疗工作中,加强帕金森病的跨学科护理合作越来越重要。因此,世界各地的医疗服务提供者正在针对特定疾病组织区域网络结构。然而,现有的网络结构不尽相同,关键的推动因素尚未确定:为了系统地确定最初对建立帕金森病跨学科合作网络感兴趣的医护专业人员构成的关键因素、他们的动机和期望,我们在德国三个不同地区进行了一项基本评估,共涉及 23405 名帕金森病患者:方法:我们使用了一份专门开发的半开放式问卷,主要内容包括社会人口信息、接触方式、跨学科合作和联系。结果:最关键的专业是门诊:最重要的职业是门诊治疗师(物理治疗师、职业治疗师、语言治疗师)(36.7%)和住院运动障碍专家(21.1%),前者的平均病例数为 10.1 例/3 个月,后者的平均病例数为 197.4 例/3 个月。在实施帕金森病网络之前,48.9% 的门诊治疗师与神经科医生没有任何联系。58.9%的护理人员认为目前的合作频率不够。缺乏政治支持和时间不足被认为是加强合作的主要障碍:结论:加强护理合作的驱动力来自不同的医疗保健部门。因此,为专业教育和跨学科、跨部门交流提供工具的网络必不可少。要在全区范围内推广网络护理,就必须重新思考网络护理的政治框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intracranial hemorrhage after ischemic stroke in patients on direct oral anticoagulants: results from a prospective observational study. Evaluation of predictors indicating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with acute ischemic strokes: the Find-AFRANDOMISED trial. Defining early surgery in traumatic spinal cord injury: admission-based versus injury-based timing. Letter to the editor regarding "Safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients with direct oral anticoagulation: experience from a German stroke center" by Mers et al. Response to the letter to the editor regarding "safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients with direct oral anticoagulation".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1