Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion: Professionals' Performance and Implications for Patient Safety: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.9 Q1 NURSING Journal of Infusion Nursing Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1097/NAN.0000000000000531
Lucimar Casimiro de Souza, Juliana Faria Campos, Debora Mazioli Machado, Gabriella da Silva Rangel Ribeiro, Romanda da Costa Pereira Barboza Lemos, Sabrina da Costa Machado, Marcelle Miranda da Silva, Veronica Rita Dias Coutinho, Rafael Celestino da Silva
{"title":"Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion: Professionals' Performance and Implications for Patient Safety: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Lucimar Casimiro de Souza, Juliana Faria Campos, Debora Mazioli Machado, Gabriella da Silva Rangel Ribeiro, Romanda da Costa Pereira Barboza Lemos, Sabrina da Costa Machado, Marcelle Miranda da Silva, Veronica Rita Dias Coutinho, Rafael Celestino da Silva","doi":"10.1097/NAN.0000000000000531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated peripheral intravenous catheter insertion by licensed practical nurses in a simulated scenario. This cross-sectional and descriptive study was performed in a general hospital's simulation center located in Brazil, from January to October 2020. The authors developed a tool from the leading guidelines to measure peripheral intravenous catheter insertion performance in 60 licensed practical nurses. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, with proportions for categorical variables and analytical statistics to denote significance, using SPSS version 22.0. Ethical aspects were respected. Despite the sample comprising professionals who declared an average experience with peripheral intravenous catheter insertion of 6.4 years, at least 50% failed in some tool element. This low score on peripheral intravenous catheter insertion performance is because automation is possible without efforts to improve it. Adding years of practice does not generate better performance. The licensed practical nurses' performance was lower than expected, considering their reported experience, which poses a risk to patient safety. The training of these professionals needs to be discussed in countries where the practice is legal. Skills training should include simulation to approximate clinical practice; nurses must exercise their role in supervising the team.</p>","PeriodicalId":46291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infusion Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infusion Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated peripheral intravenous catheter insertion by licensed practical nurses in a simulated scenario. This cross-sectional and descriptive study was performed in a general hospital's simulation center located in Brazil, from January to October 2020. The authors developed a tool from the leading guidelines to measure peripheral intravenous catheter insertion performance in 60 licensed practical nurses. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, with proportions for categorical variables and analytical statistics to denote significance, using SPSS version 22.0. Ethical aspects were respected. Despite the sample comprising professionals who declared an average experience with peripheral intravenous catheter insertion of 6.4 years, at least 50% failed in some tool element. This low score on peripheral intravenous catheter insertion performance is because automation is possible without efforts to improve it. Adding years of practice does not generate better performance. The licensed practical nurses' performance was lower than expected, considering their reported experience, which poses a risk to patient safety. The training of these professionals needs to be discussed in countries where the practice is legal. Skills training should include simulation to approximate clinical practice; nurses must exercise their role in supervising the team.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外周静脉导管插入:专业人员的表现及对患者安全的影响:一项横断面研究。
本研究评估了执业护士在模拟场景中插入外周静脉导管的情况。这项横断面描述性研究于 2020 年 1 月至 10 月在巴西一家综合医院的模拟中心进行。作者根据主要指南开发了一种工具,用于测量 60 名执业护士的外周静脉导管插入性能。使用 SPSS 22.0 版对数据进行了描述性统计分析,对分类变量进行了比例统计分析,对显著性进行了分析统计。尊重伦理道德。尽管样本中的专业人员平均拥有 6.4 年的外周静脉导管插入经验,但至少有 50%的人在某些工具要素上不及格。外周静脉导管插入性能得分如此之低,是因为如果不努力改进,自动化是有可能实现的。增加实践年限并不能提高绩效。考虑到执业护士报告的经验,他们的表现低于预期,这给患者安全带来了风险。在执业合法的国家,需要对这些专业人员的培训进行讨论。技能培训应包括模拟临床实践;护士必须发挥其监督团队的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
15.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Journal of Infusion Nursing, the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society (INS), seeks to promote excellence in infusion nursing by presenting new research, clinical reviews, case studies, and professional development information relevant to the practice of infusion therapy. Articles selected for publication represent the broad scope of the infusion specialty and draw on the expertise of all healthcare providers who participate in the delivery of infusion therapy.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Pumping Infusion-Induced Contamination With Different Syringe Types. An Exemplary Publication. Complications Related to the Securement Device in Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: A Randomized Study. Midline Catheter-Associated Thrombosis (MCAT): Does Tip Location in the Axillary Vein Increase Risk? Parenteral Nutrition Safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1