What predicts psychosocial functioning in borderline personality disorder? Investigating the association with reflective functioning.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1111/papt.12516
Jana Volkert, Gabrielle S Ilagan, Evan A Iliakis, Boyu Ren, Paul Schröder-Pfeifer, Lois W Choi-Kain
{"title":"What predicts psychosocial functioning in borderline personality disorder? Investigating the association with reflective functioning.","authors":"Jana Volkert, Gabrielle S Ilagan, Evan A Iliakis, Boyu Ren, Paul Schröder-Pfeifer, Lois W Choi-Kain","doi":"10.1111/papt.12516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with functioning in participants with and without borderline personality disorder (BPD). In particular, we were interested whether mentalizing and related social cognitive capacities, as factors of internal functioning, are important in predicting psychosocial functioning, in addition to other psychopathological and sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study with N = 53 right-handed females with and without BPD, without significant differences in age, IQ, and socioeconomic status, who completed semi-structured diagnostic and self-report measures of social cognition. Mentalizing was assessed using the Reflective Functioning Scale based on transcribed Adult Attachment Interviews. A regularized regression with the elastic net penalty was deployed to investigate whether mentalizing and social cognition predict psychosocial functioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Borderline personality disorder symptom severity, sexual abuse trauma, and social and socio-economic factors ranked as the most important variables in predicting psychosocial functioning, while reflective functioning (RF) was somewhat less important in the prediction, social cognitive functioning and sociodemographic variables were least important.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Borderline personality disorder symptom severity was most important in determining functional impairment, alongside trauma related to sexual abuse as well as social and socio-economic factors. These findings verify that BPD symptoms themselves most robustly predict functional impairment, followed by history of sexual abuse, then contextual factors (e.g. housing, financial, physical health), and then RF. These results lend marginal support to the conceptualization that mentalizing may enhance psychosocial functioning by facilitating social learning, but emphasize symptom reduction and stabilization of life context as key intervention targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":54539,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12516","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with functioning in participants with and without borderline personality disorder (BPD). In particular, we were interested whether mentalizing and related social cognitive capacities, as factors of internal functioning, are important in predicting psychosocial functioning, in addition to other psychopathological and sociodemographic factors.

Method: This is a cross-sectional study with N = 53 right-handed females with and without BPD, without significant differences in age, IQ, and socioeconomic status, who completed semi-structured diagnostic and self-report measures of social cognition. Mentalizing was assessed using the Reflective Functioning Scale based on transcribed Adult Attachment Interviews. A regularized regression with the elastic net penalty was deployed to investigate whether mentalizing and social cognition predict psychosocial functioning.

Results: Borderline personality disorder symptom severity, sexual abuse trauma, and social and socio-economic factors ranked as the most important variables in predicting psychosocial functioning, while reflective functioning (RF) was somewhat less important in the prediction, social cognitive functioning and sociodemographic variables were least important.

Conclusions: Borderline personality disorder symptom severity was most important in determining functional impairment, alongside trauma related to sexual abuse as well as social and socio-economic factors. These findings verify that BPD symptoms themselves most robustly predict functional impairment, followed by history of sexual abuse, then contextual factors (e.g. housing, financial, physical health), and then RF. These results lend marginal support to the conceptualization that mentalizing may enhance psychosocial functioning by facilitating social learning, but emphasize symptom reduction and stabilization of life context as key intervention targets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么能预测边缘型人格障碍患者的社会心理功能?调查与反思功能的关联。
研究目的本研究旨在调查与边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者和非边缘型人格障碍患者的功能相关的因素。特别是,我们感兴趣的是,除了其他精神病理学和社会人口学因素外,作为内部功能因素的心智化和相关社会认知能力对预测社会心理功能是否重要:这是一项横断面研究,共有 53 名患有和未患有 BPD 的右撇子女性参加,她们在年龄、智商和社会经济地位方面没有显著差异,并完成了社会认知的半结构化诊断和自我报告测量。对心理化的评估采用基于成人依恋访谈记录的反思功能量表。采用弹性净值惩罚的正则化回归来研究心理化和社会认知是否能预测社会心理功能:结果:边缘型人格障碍症状严重程度、性虐待创伤、社会和社会经济因素是预测社会心理功能的最重要变量,而反思功能(RF)在预测中的重要性稍低,社会认知功能和社会人口变量的重要性最低:边际型人格障碍症状的严重程度是决定功能障碍的最重要因素,此外还有与性虐待相关的创伤以及社会和社会经济因素。这些研究结果证实,边缘型人格障碍症状本身对功能损害的预测作用最强,其次是性虐待史,然后是环境因素(如住房、经济、身体健康),最后是射频。这些结果在一定程度上支持了心理化可通过促进社会学习来增强社会心理功能的概念,但强调症状减轻和生活环境稳定是关键的干预目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory Research and Practice (formerly The British Journal of Medical Psychology) is an international scientific journal with a focus on the psychological and social processes that underlie the development and improvement of psychological problems and mental wellbeing, including: theoretical and research development in the understanding of cognitive and emotional factors in psychological problems; behaviour and relationships; vulnerability to, adjustment to, assessment of, and recovery (assisted or otherwise) from psychological distresses; psychological therapies with a focus on understanding the processes which affect outcomes where mental health is concerned.
期刊最新文献
Adult stakeholders' perspectives on supporting or undermining the mental health of sexual and gender minoritised adolescents. A qualitative study exploring participants experiences of the Mental Imagery for Suicidality in Students Trial. Lost in translation? Qualitative interviews with Australian psychedelic-assisted therapy trial clinicians. ‘Cheering on from the side‐lines’: The perceived impact of romantic partner's commentary and behaviour on maintaining women's appearance anxiety 'Like walking with someone as opposed to trying to catch up to them'-Dynamics at play when clinicians and young people formulate together.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1