Psychometric Properties and Cutoff Value of the Turkish Overactive Bladder Symptom Score.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-28 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001446
Emine Baran, Ceren Gürşen, Serap Ozgul, Gamze Nalan Çinar, Gulbala Nakip, Esra Üzelpasaci, Nejat Ozgul, Mehmet Sinan Beksaç, Türkan Akbayrak
{"title":"Psychometric Properties and Cutoff Value of the Turkish Overactive Bladder Symptom Score.","authors":"Emine Baran, Ceren Gürşen, Serap Ozgul, Gamze Nalan Çinar, Gulbala Nakip, Esra Üzelpasaci, Nejat Ozgul, Mehmet Sinan Beksaç, Türkan Akbayrak","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) measures all overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms with graded answers, evaluates urgency symptoms, and reveals the subjective bladder control. However, the Turkish version and the cutoff value of the questionnaire have not yet been studied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this study were to determine the psychometric properties of the 7-item OABSS and to estimate the cutoff value of the scale.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was an observational study. The internal consistency (Cronbach α) and test-retest reliability were analyzed, and exploratory factor analysis was performed. For the criterion validity, the correlations between the OABSS, the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire, and outcomes of a bladder diary were used. The cutoff value of the OABSS was analyzed by the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with (n = 49) and without (n = 38) OAB were included. The internal consistency was very strong (Cronbach α = 0.95). The test-retest reliability was very strong (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.93-0.95, P = 0.001). The percentage of explanation of the total variance was calculated as 78%. There was a strong to very strong correlation between the OABSS and the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire and Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms scores and outcomes of the bladder diary. The cutoff value for the OABSS was determined as 10.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Turkish OABSS was found to be a valid and reliable scale to determine OAB symptoms and severity. Those who score more than 10.5 on the questionnaire can be considered as at risk of OAB syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) measures all overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms with graded answers, evaluates urgency symptoms, and reveals the subjective bladder control. However, the Turkish version and the cutoff value of the questionnaire have not yet been studied.

Objective: The aims of this study were to determine the psychometric properties of the 7-item OABSS and to estimate the cutoff value of the scale.

Study design: This was an observational study. The internal consistency (Cronbach α) and test-retest reliability were analyzed, and exploratory factor analysis was performed. For the criterion validity, the correlations between the OABSS, the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire, and outcomes of a bladder diary were used. The cutoff value of the OABSS was analyzed by the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis.

Results: Participants with (n = 49) and without (n = 38) OAB were included. The internal consistency was very strong (Cronbach α = 0.95). The test-retest reliability was very strong (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.93-0.95, P = 0.001). The percentage of explanation of the total variance was calculated as 78%. There was a strong to very strong correlation between the OABSS and the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire and Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms scores and outcomes of the bladder diary. The cutoff value for the OABSS was determined as 10.5.

Conclusions: The Turkish OABSS was found to be a valid and reliable scale to determine OAB symptoms and severity. Those who score more than 10.5 on the questionnaire can be considered as at risk of OAB syndrome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其膀胱过度活动症状评分的心理计量特性和临界值。
重要性:膀胱过度活动症症状评分(OABSS)以分级回答的方式测量所有膀胱过度活动症(OAB)症状,评估尿急症状,并显示主观膀胱控制能力。然而,该问卷的土耳其语版本和临界值尚未得到研究:研究设计:这是一项观察性研究:研究设计:这是一项观察性研究。研究分析了量表的内部一致性(Cronbach α)和重测信度,并进行了探索性因子分析。在标准效度方面,采用了 OABSS、膀胱过度活动症问卷、布里斯托尔女性下尿路症状问卷和膀胱日记结果之间的相关性。通过接收者工作特征曲线分析法分析了膀胱过度活动症的临界值:结果:研究对象包括有(49 人)和无(38 人)OAB 患者。内部一致性非常好(Cronbach α = 0.95)。测试-再测可靠性非常高(类内相关系数 = 0.93-0.95,P = 0.001)。计算得出的总方差解释百分比为 78%。OABSS、膀胱过度活动症问卷和布里斯托尔女性下尿路症状评分与膀胱日记结果之间存在很强到非常强的相关性。结论:土耳其尿失禁症状量表被认为是确定尿失禁症状和严重程度的有效而可靠的量表。在问卷中得分超过 10.5 分的人可被视为 OAB 综合征的高危人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of a Simulation Model for Ureteral Stent Placement. Implementing a Digital Platform for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections. Unexpected Pathology During Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair in an Urban Population. Green Cystoscopy: Does Minimizing the Use of Drapes Increase Infection Rates? Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial: KIM Sling With Reusable Trocars Versus TVT Exact Sling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1