The Impact of Isolated Preoperative Cannabis Use on Outcomes Following Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

The Iowa orthopaedic journal Pub Date : 2023-12-01
Neil V Shah, Cameron R Moattari, Joshua D Lavian, Samuel Gedailovich, Benjamin Krasnyanskiy, George A Beyer, Nolan Condron, Peter G Passias, Renaud Lafage, Han Jo Kim, Frank J Schwab, Virginie Lafage, Carl B Paulino, Bassel G Diebo
{"title":"The Impact of Isolated Preoperative Cannabis Use on Outcomes Following Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.","authors":"Neil V Shah, Cameron R Moattari, Joshua D Lavian, Samuel Gedailovich, Benjamin Krasnyanskiy, George A Beyer, Nolan Condron, Peter G Passias, Renaud Lafage, Han Jo Kim, Frank J Schwab, Virginie Lafage, Carl B Paulino, Bassel G Diebo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cannabis is the most commonly used recreational drug in the USA. Studies evaluating cannabis use and its impact on outcomes following cervical spinal fusion (CF) are limited. This study sought to assess the impact of isolated (exclusive) cannabis use on postoperative outcomes following CF by analyzing outcomes like complications, readmissions, and revisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) was queried for patients who underwent CF between January 2009 and September 2013. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and either a minimum 90-day (for complications and readmissions) or 2-year (for revisions) follow-up surveillance. Patients with systemic disease, osteomyelitis, cancer, trauma, and concomitant substance or polysubstance abuse/dependence were excluded. Patients with a preoperative International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis of isolated cannabis abuse (Cannabis) or dependence were identified. The primary outcome measures were 90-day complications, 90-day readmissions, and two-year revisions following CF. Cannabis patients were 1:1 propensity score-matched by age, gender, race, Deyo score, surgical approach, and tobacco use to non-cannabis users and compared for outcomes. Multivariate binary stepwise logistic regression models identified independent predictors of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>432 patients (n=216 each) with comparable age, sex, Deyo scores, tobacco use, and distribution of anterior or posterior surgical approaches were identified (all p>0.05). Cannabis patients were predominantly Black (27.8% vs. 12.0%), primarily utilized Medicaid (29.6% vs. 12.5%), and had longer LOS (3.0 vs. 1.9 days), all p≤0.001. Both cohorts experienced comparable rates of 90-day medical and surgical, as well as overall complications (5.6% vs. 3.7%) and two-year revisions (4.2% vs. 2.8%, p=0.430), but isolated cannabis patients had higher 90-day readmission rates (11.6% vs. 6.0%, p=0.042). Isolated cannabis use independently predicted 90-day readmission (Odds Ratio=2.0), but did not predict any 90-day complications or two year revisions (all p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Isolated baseline cannabis dependence/abuse was associated with increased risk of 90-day readmission following CF. Further investigation of the physiologic impact of cannabis on musculoskeletal patients may elucidate significant contributory factors. <b>Level of Evidence: III</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94233,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":"43 2","pages":"117-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10777691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cannabis is the most commonly used recreational drug in the USA. Studies evaluating cannabis use and its impact on outcomes following cervical spinal fusion (CF) are limited. This study sought to assess the impact of isolated (exclusive) cannabis use on postoperative outcomes following CF by analyzing outcomes like complications, readmissions, and revisions.

Methods: The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) was queried for patients who underwent CF between January 2009 and September 2013. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and either a minimum 90-day (for complications and readmissions) or 2-year (for revisions) follow-up surveillance. Patients with systemic disease, osteomyelitis, cancer, trauma, and concomitant substance or polysubstance abuse/dependence were excluded. Patients with a preoperative International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis of isolated cannabis abuse (Cannabis) or dependence were identified. The primary outcome measures were 90-day complications, 90-day readmissions, and two-year revisions following CF. Cannabis patients were 1:1 propensity score-matched by age, gender, race, Deyo score, surgical approach, and tobacco use to non-cannabis users and compared for outcomes. Multivariate binary stepwise logistic regression models identified independent predictors of outcomes.

Results: 432 patients (n=216 each) with comparable age, sex, Deyo scores, tobacco use, and distribution of anterior or posterior surgical approaches were identified (all p>0.05). Cannabis patients were predominantly Black (27.8% vs. 12.0%), primarily utilized Medicaid (29.6% vs. 12.5%), and had longer LOS (3.0 vs. 1.9 days), all p≤0.001. Both cohorts experienced comparable rates of 90-day medical and surgical, as well as overall complications (5.6% vs. 3.7%) and two-year revisions (4.2% vs. 2.8%, p=0.430), but isolated cannabis patients had higher 90-day readmission rates (11.6% vs. 6.0%, p=0.042). Isolated cannabis use independently predicted 90-day readmission (Odds Ratio=2.0), but did not predict any 90-day complications or two year revisions (all p>0.05).

Conclusion: Isolated baseline cannabis dependence/abuse was associated with increased risk of 90-day readmission following CF. Further investigation of the physiologic impact of cannabis on musculoskeletal patients may elucidate significant contributory factors. Level of Evidence: III.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前单独使用大麻对颈椎融合术后疗效的影响:倾向评分匹配分析
背景:大麻是美国最常用的娱乐性药物。评估大麻使用及其对颈椎融合术(CF)术后效果影响的研究非常有限。本研究试图通过分析并发症、再入院和复查等结果,评估单独(完全)使用大麻对颈椎融合术术后效果的影响:方法:在纽约全州规划与研究合作系统(SPARCS)中查询了 2009 年 1 月至 2013 年 9 月间接受 CF 手术的患者。纳入标准为年龄≥18岁,至少接受过90天(并发症和再入院)或2年(翻修)随访监测。排除患有全身性疾病、骨髓炎、癌症、外伤以及同时存在药物或多种药物滥用/依赖的患者。术前国际疾病分类第 9 版临床修订版(ICD-9-CM)诊断为单独大麻滥用(Cannabis)或依赖的患者均被确定。主要结果指标为 90 天并发症、90 天再入院率和 CF 术后两年复查率。根据年龄、性别、种族、Deyo 评分、手术方式和烟草使用情况,对大麻患者与非大麻使用者进行 1:1 的倾向评分匹配,并对结果进行比较。多变量二元逐步逻辑回归模型确定了结果的独立预测因素:共发现 432 例患者(每例 216 人),其年龄、性别、Deyo 评分、烟草使用情况以及前路或后路手术方式的分布具有可比性(均 p>0.05)。大麻患者主要为黑人(27.8% 对 12.0%),主要使用医疗补助(29.6% 对 12.5%),住院时间较长(3.0 天对 1.9 天),所有数据均小于 0.001。两组患者的 90 天内科和外科治疗率、总体并发症发生率(5.6% 对 3.7%)和两年复查率(4.2% 对 2.8%,P=0.430)相当,但隔离大麻患者的 90 天再入院率更高(11.6% 对 6.0%,P=0.042)。单独使用大麻可独立预测 90 天再入院率(Odds Ratio=2.0),但不能预测任何 90 天并发症或两年复查率(所有 p>0.05):结论:孤立的大麻依赖/滥用基线与 CF 术后 90 天再入院风险增加有关。进一步研究大麻对肌肉骨骼患者的生理影响可能会发现重要的促成因素。证据等级:证据等级:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pain Management for Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Systematic Review. Peri-Operative Management of Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Report of Current Practices from the Anchor Group, Supporting Literature, and Areas for Future Investigation. Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Very Young Children - A Case Report and Modern Review. Predicting Septic Arthritis in the Setting of Crystalline Arthropathy in the Native Joint Using Laboratory Data. Predictive Factors for Intraoperative Determination for the Need of Femoral Osteochondroplasty After Periacetabular Osteotomy for Acetabular Dysplasia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1