Measuring Multidimensional Aspects of Health in the Oldest Old Using the NIH Toolbox: Results From the ARMADA Study.

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1093/arclin/acad105
Molly A Mather, Emily H Ho, Katy Bedjeti, Tatiana Karpouzian-Rogers, Emily J Rogalski, Richard Gershon, Sandra Weintraub
{"title":"Measuring Multidimensional Aspects of Health in the Oldest Old Using the NIH Toolbox: Results From the ARMADA Study.","authors":"Molly A Mather, Emily H Ho, Katy Bedjeti, Tatiana Karpouzian-Rogers, Emily J Rogalski, Richard Gershon, Sandra Weintraub","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acad105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The percentage of older adults living into their 80s and beyond is expanding rapidly. Characterization of typical cognitive performance in this population is complicated by a dearth of normative data for the oldest old. Additionally, little attention has been paid to other aspects of health, such as motor, sensory, and emotional functioning, that may interact with cognitive changes to predict quality of life and well-being. The current study used the NIH Toolbox (NIHTB) to determine age group differences between persons aged 65-84 and 85+ with normal cognition.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were recruited in two age bands (i.e., 65-84 and 85+). All participants completed the NIHTB Cognition, Motor, Sensation, and Emotion modules. Independent-samples t-tests determined age group differences with post-hoc adjustments using Bonferroni corrections. All subtest and composite scores were then regressed on age and other demographic covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 65-84 group obtained significantly higher scores than the 85+ group across all cognitive measures except oral reading, all motor measures except gait speed, and all sensation measures except pain interference. Age remained a significant predictor after controlling for covariates. Age was not significantly associated with differences in emotion scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results support the use of the NIHTB in persons over 85 with normal cognition. As expected, fluid reasoning abilities and certain motor and sensory functions decreased with age in the oldest old. Inclusion of motor and sensation batteries is warranted when studying trajectories of aging in the oldest old to allow for multidimensional characterization of health.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"535-546"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11269891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acad105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The percentage of older adults living into their 80s and beyond is expanding rapidly. Characterization of typical cognitive performance in this population is complicated by a dearth of normative data for the oldest old. Additionally, little attention has been paid to other aspects of health, such as motor, sensory, and emotional functioning, that may interact with cognitive changes to predict quality of life and well-being. The current study used the NIH Toolbox (NIHTB) to determine age group differences between persons aged 65-84 and 85+ with normal cognition.

Method: Participants were recruited in two age bands (i.e., 65-84 and 85+). All participants completed the NIHTB Cognition, Motor, Sensation, and Emotion modules. Independent-samples t-tests determined age group differences with post-hoc adjustments using Bonferroni corrections. All subtest and composite scores were then regressed on age and other demographic covariates.

Results: The 65-84 group obtained significantly higher scores than the 85+ group across all cognitive measures except oral reading, all motor measures except gait speed, and all sensation measures except pain interference. Age remained a significant predictor after controlling for covariates. Age was not significantly associated with differences in emotion scores.

Conclusions: Results support the use of the NIHTB in persons over 85 with normal cognition. As expected, fluid reasoning abilities and certain motor and sensory functions decreased with age in the oldest old. Inclusion of motor and sensation batteries is warranted when studying trajectories of aging in the oldest old to allow for multidimensional characterization of health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用美国国立卫生研究院工具箱测量高龄老人的多维健康状况:ARMADA 研究的结果。
目标:活到 80 岁及以上的老年人比例正在迅速增加。由于缺乏高龄老人的常模数据,对这一人群典型认知能力的描述变得复杂。此外,人们很少关注健康的其他方面,如运动、感官和情绪功能,这些方面可能与认知变化相互作用,从而预测生活质量和幸福感。本研究使用美国国立卫生研究院工具箱(NIHTB)来确定认知正常的 65-84 岁和 85 岁以上老年人的年龄组差异:方法:分两个年龄段(即 65-84 岁和 85 岁以上)招募参与者。所有参与者均完成了 NIHTB 认知、运动、感觉和情感模块。通过独立样本 t 检验确定年龄组差异,并使用 Bonferroni 校正进行事后调整。然后将所有分测验和综合得分与年龄和其他人口统计学协变量进行回归:结果:在除口语阅读外的所有认知测量、除步速外的所有运动测量和除疼痛干扰外的所有感觉测量中,65-84 岁组的得分均明显高于 85 岁以上组。在控制协变量后,年龄仍然是一个重要的预测因素。年龄与情绪评分的差异无明显关联:结论:研究结果支持对 85 岁以上认知正常的老年人使用 NIHTB。正如预期的那样,随着年龄的增长,高龄老人的流体推理能力以及某些运动和感觉功能有所下降。在研究高龄老人的衰老轨迹时,有必要纳入运动和感觉电池,以便从多维度描述健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Language and Cognitive Impairments in Multiple Sclerosis: a Comparative Study of RRMS and SPMS Patients. Relationship Between Cognitive Estimation, Executive Functions, and Theory of Mind in Patients With Prefrontal Cortex Damage. Improving Access to Dementia Care in the Era of Monoclonal Antibody Treatments for Alzheimer's Disease: a Pilot Clinical Protocol Using Abbreviated Neuropsychological Assessment. Anticholinergic Medication Burden and Cognitive Subtypes in Parkinson's Disease without Dementia. Examining the role of depression on the relationship between performance-based and self-reported cognitive functioning after sport-related concussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1