Association of biofilm formation, antimicrobial resistance, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes among Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Clinical Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1111/crj.13732
Arnon Chukamnerd, Niwat Saipetch, Kamonnut Singkhamanan, Natnicha Ingviya, Nawaporn Assanangkornchai, Komwit Surachat, Sarunyou Chusri
{"title":"Association of biofilm formation, antimicrobial resistance, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes among Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia","authors":"Arnon Chukamnerd,&nbsp;Niwat Saipetch,&nbsp;Kamonnut Singkhamanan,&nbsp;Natnicha Ingviya,&nbsp;Nawaporn Assanangkornchai,&nbsp;Komwit Surachat,&nbsp;Sarunyou Chusri","doi":"10.1111/crj.13732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Biofilm formation is an important virulence factor of <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>. Here, we examined the biofilm formation of archived <i>A. baumannii</i> causing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eighteen and twenty isolates of <i>A. baumannii</i> causing bacteremic pneumonia and non-bacteremic pneumonia were included, respectively. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution method, while biofilm formation was evaluated by microtiter dish biofilm formation assay.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All 38 isolates were still susceptible to colistin and tigecycline, whereas almost all isolates were non-susceptible (intermediate to resistant) to several antimicrobial agents, especially ceftriaxone and cefotaxime. Approximately, 44% of bacteremic isolates and 50% of non-bacteremic isolates were classified as carbapenem-resistant <i>A. baumannii</i> (CRAB). Biofilm formation was detected in 42% of the studied isolates. Bacteremia among the patients infected with biofilm-producing isolates was significantly higher than in those infected with non-biofilm-producing isolates. The antimicrobial susceptibilities of <i>A. baumannii</i> with biofilm formation were lower than those without biofilm formation, but the differences did not have statistical significance. The patients infected with non-biofilm-producing isolates had good clinical and non-clinical outcomes than those infected with biofilm-producing isolates. The survival rate of patients diagnosed with VAP due to biofilm-producing <i>A. baumannii</i> was lower than in those patients diagnosed with VAP due to non-biofilm-producing isolates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Biofilm formation of <i>A. baumannii</i> causing VAP was associated with antimicrobial resistance and bacteremia as well as unfavorable clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55247,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/crj.13732","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/crj.13732","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Biofilm formation is an important virulence factor of Acinetobacter baumannii. Here, we examined the biofilm formation of archived A. baumannii causing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

Methods

Eighteen and twenty isolates of A. baumannii causing bacteremic pneumonia and non-bacteremic pneumonia were included, respectively. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution method, while biofilm formation was evaluated by microtiter dish biofilm formation assay.

Results

All 38 isolates were still susceptible to colistin and tigecycline, whereas almost all isolates were non-susceptible (intermediate to resistant) to several antimicrobial agents, especially ceftriaxone and cefotaxime. Approximately, 44% of bacteremic isolates and 50% of non-bacteremic isolates were classified as carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB). Biofilm formation was detected in 42% of the studied isolates. Bacteremia among the patients infected with biofilm-producing isolates was significantly higher than in those infected with non-biofilm-producing isolates. The antimicrobial susceptibilities of A. baumannii with biofilm formation were lower than those without biofilm formation, but the differences did not have statistical significance. The patients infected with non-biofilm-producing isolates had good clinical and non-clinical outcomes than those infected with biofilm-producing isolates. The survival rate of patients diagnosed with VAP due to biofilm-producing A. baumannii was lower than in those patients diagnosed with VAP due to non-biofilm-producing isolates.

Conclusion

Biofilm formation of A. baumannii causing VAP was associated with antimicrobial resistance and bacteremia as well as unfavorable clinical outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从呼吸机相关肺炎患者中分离出的鲍曼不动杆菌的生物膜形成、抗菌药耐药性、临床特征和临床结果之间的关系
引言 生物膜的形成是鲍曼不动杆菌的一个重要毒力因子。在此,我们研究了引起呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)的存档鲍曼不动杆菌的生物膜形成情况。 方法 包括分别引起菌血症性肺炎和非菌血症性肺炎的 18 个和 20 个鲍曼不动杆菌分离株。采用肉汤微量稀释法进行抗菌药敏感性检测,并通过微量滴定培养皿生物膜形成试验评估生物膜形成情况。 结果 所有 38 个分离菌株对可乐定和替加环素仍有敏感性,而几乎所有分离菌株对几种抗菌药物,尤其是头孢曲松和头孢噻肟,均无敏感性(中度敏感性至耐药性)。大约 44% 的菌血症分离株和 50% 的非菌血症分离株被归类为耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)。42%的研究分离物检测到生物膜形成。感染了产生生物膜的分离株的患者中出现菌血症的比例明显高于感染了不产生生物膜的分离株的患者。有生物膜形成的鲍曼不动杆菌的抗菌药敏感性低于无生物膜形成的鲍曼不动杆菌,但差异无统计学意义。感染不产生生物膜的分离株的患者比感染产生生物膜的分离株的患者临床和非临床疗效好。因产生生物膜的鲍曼不动杆菌而确诊为 VAP 的患者的存活率低于因未产生生物膜的分离株而确诊为 VAP 的患者。 结论 引起 VAP 的鲍曼不动杆菌生物膜的形成与抗菌药耐药性和菌血症以及不利的临床结果有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Respiratory Journal
Clinical Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Overview Effective with the 2016 volume, this journal will be published in an online-only format. Aims and Scope The Clinical Respiratory Journal (CRJ) provides a forum for clinical research in all areas of respiratory medicine from clinical lung disease to basic research relevant to the clinic. We publish original research, review articles, case studies, editorials and book reviews in all areas of clinical lung disease including: Asthma Allergy COPD Non-invasive ventilation Sleep related breathing disorders Interstitial lung diseases Lung cancer Clinical genetics Rhinitis Airway and lung infection Epidemiology Pediatrics CRJ provides a fast-track service for selected Phase II and Phase III trial studies. Keywords Clinical Respiratory Journal, respiratory, pulmonary, medicine, clinical, lung disease, Abstracting and Indexing Information Academic Search (EBSCO Publishing) Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing) Embase (Elsevier) Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest) HEED: Health Economic Evaluations Database (Wiley-Blackwell) Hospital Premium Collection (ProQuest) Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics) MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics) SCOPUS (Elsevier)
期刊最新文献
SIRT3 Inhibits Cell Proliferation of Nonsmall Cell Lung Carcinoma by Inducing ROS Production IGF2BP3/CTCF Axis-Dependent NT5DC2 Promotes M2 Macrophage Polarization to Enhance the Malignant Progression of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Issue Information Clinical Benefits of new Systemic Therapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer Over Two Decades: A Cross-Sectional Study Activation of Automatic Tube Compensation Mode Attenuates Auto-PEEP in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1