Generative artificial intelligence performs rudimentary structural biology modelling

bioRxiv Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1101/2024.01.10.575113
Alexander M. Ille, Christopher Markosian, Stephen K. Burley, Michael B. Mathews, R. Pasqualini, W. Arap
{"title":"Generative artificial intelligence performs rudimentary structural biology modelling","authors":"Alexander M. Ille, Christopher Markosian, Stephen K. Burley, Michael B. Mathews, R. Pasqualini, W. Arap","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.10.575113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is being increasingly used by researchers in numerous fields of study, including the biological sciences. To date, the most commonly used tool grounded in this technology has been Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT). While ChatGPT is typically applied for natural language text generation, other application modes include coding and mathematical problem-solving. We have recently reported the ability of ChatGPT to interpret the central dogma of molecular biology and the genetic code. Here we explored how ChatGPT performs rudimentary structural biology modelling in order to gain evaluative insight. We prompted ChatGPT to model 3D structures for the 20 standard amino acids as well as an α-helical polypeptide chain, with the latter involving incorporation of the Wolfram plugin for advanced mathematical computation. For amino acid modelling, distances and angles between atoms of the generated structures in most cases approximated to around experimentally-determined values. For α-helix modelling, the generated structures were comparable to that of an experimentally-determined α-helical structure. However, both amino acid and α-helix modelling were sporadically error-prone and increased molecular complexity was not well tolerated. Despite current limitations, our findings show the capability of generative AI to perform basic structural biology modelling with atomic-scale accuracy. These results provide a precedent for the potential use of generative AI in structural biology as this technology continues to advance.","PeriodicalId":505198,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.10.575113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is being increasingly used by researchers in numerous fields of study, including the biological sciences. To date, the most commonly used tool grounded in this technology has been Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT). While ChatGPT is typically applied for natural language text generation, other application modes include coding and mathematical problem-solving. We have recently reported the ability of ChatGPT to interpret the central dogma of molecular biology and the genetic code. Here we explored how ChatGPT performs rudimentary structural biology modelling in order to gain evaluative insight. We prompted ChatGPT to model 3D structures for the 20 standard amino acids as well as an α-helical polypeptide chain, with the latter involving incorporation of the Wolfram plugin for advanced mathematical computation. For amino acid modelling, distances and angles between atoms of the generated structures in most cases approximated to around experimentally-determined values. For α-helix modelling, the generated structures were comparable to that of an experimentally-determined α-helical structure. However, both amino acid and α-helix modelling were sporadically error-prone and increased molecular complexity was not well tolerated. Despite current limitations, our findings show the capability of generative AI to perform basic structural biology modelling with atomic-scale accuracy. These results provide a precedent for the potential use of generative AI in structural biology as this technology continues to advance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生成式人工智能进行初级结构生物学建模
生成式人工智能(AI)正越来越多地被包括生物科学在内的众多研究领域的研究人员所使用。迄今为止,该技术最常用的工具是 Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer(ChatGPT)。ChatGPT 通常用于自然语言文本生成,其他应用模式还包括编码和数学问题求解。我们最近报道了 ChatGPT 解释分子生物学核心教条和遗传密码的能力。在此,我们探讨了 ChatGPT 如何执行初级结构生物学建模,以获得评估性洞察力。我们让 ChatGPT 对 20 个标准氨基酸和一条 α 螺旋多肽链进行三维结构建模,后者需要使用 Wolfram 插件进行高级数学计算。在氨基酸建模方面,大多数情况下生成的结构中原子间的距离和角度近似于实验确定的值。在 α 螺旋建模方面,生成的结构与实验确定的 α 螺旋结构相当。然而,氨基酸和α-螺旋建模都会偶尔出错,而且对分子复杂性的增加也不能很好地容忍。尽管存在目前的局限性,但我们的研究结果表明,生成式人工智能有能力以原子尺度的精度进行基础结构生物学建模。随着人工智能技术的不断进步,这些结果为人工智能在结构生物学中的潜在应用提供了先例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stability of cross-sensory input to primary somatosensory cortex across experience Genomic re-sequencing reveals mutational divergence across genetically engineered strains of model archaea A principled approach to community detection in interareal cortical networks A minimal mathematical model for polarity establishment and centralsplindlin-independent cytokinesis PTEN neddylation aggravates CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance in breast cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1