Current role of radiomics and radiogenomics in predicting oncological outcomes in bladder cancer

N. O’Sullivan, Hugo C. Temperley, Alison Corr, J. F. Meaney, Peter E. Lonergan, Michael E Kelly
{"title":"Current role of radiomics and radiogenomics in predicting oncological outcomes in bladder cancer","authors":"N. O’Sullivan, Hugo C. Temperley, Alison Corr, J. F. Meaney, Peter E. Lonergan, Michael E Kelly","doi":"10.1097/cu9.0000000000000235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Radiomics refers to the conversion of medical images into high-throughput, quantifiable data to analyze disease patterns, aid decision-making, and predict prognosis. Radiogenomics is an extension of radiomics and involves a combination of conventional radiomics techniques with molecular analysis in the form of genomic and transcriptomic data. In the field of bladder cancer, studies have investigated the development, implementation, and efficacy of radiomic and radiogenomic nomograms in predicting tumor grade, gene expression, and oncological outcomes, with variable results. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the current literature to investigate the development of a radiomics-based nomogram to predict oncological outcomes in bladder cancer.\n \n \n \n The Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched up to February 17, 2023. Gray literature was also searched to further identify other suitable publications. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 and Radiomics Quality Score.\n \n \n \n Radiogenomic nomograms generally had good performance in predicting the primary outcome across the included studies. The median area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity across the included studies were 0.83 (0.63–0.973), 0.813, and 0.815, respectively, in the training set and 0.75 (0.702–0.838), 0.723, and 0.652, respectively, in the validation set.\n \n \n \n Several studies have demonstrated the predictive potential of radiomic and radiogenomic models in advanced pelvic oncology. Further large-scale studies in a prospective setting are required to further validate results and allow generalized use in modern medicine.\n","PeriodicalId":510120,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/cu9.0000000000000235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiomics refers to the conversion of medical images into high-throughput, quantifiable data to analyze disease patterns, aid decision-making, and predict prognosis. Radiogenomics is an extension of radiomics and involves a combination of conventional radiomics techniques with molecular analysis in the form of genomic and transcriptomic data. In the field of bladder cancer, studies have investigated the development, implementation, and efficacy of radiomic and radiogenomic nomograms in predicting tumor grade, gene expression, and oncological outcomes, with variable results. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the current literature to investigate the development of a radiomics-based nomogram to predict oncological outcomes in bladder cancer. The Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched up to February 17, 2023. Gray literature was also searched to further identify other suitable publications. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 and Radiomics Quality Score. Radiogenomic nomograms generally had good performance in predicting the primary outcome across the included studies. The median area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity across the included studies were 0.83 (0.63–0.973), 0.813, and 0.815, respectively, in the training set and 0.75 (0.702–0.838), 0.723, and 0.652, respectively, in the validation set. Several studies have demonstrated the predictive potential of radiomic and radiogenomic models in advanced pelvic oncology. Further large-scale studies in a prospective setting are required to further validate results and allow generalized use in modern medicine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射组学和放射基因组学目前在预测膀胱癌肿瘤预后中的作用
放射组学是指将医学影像转化为高通量、可量化的数据,用于分析疾病模式、辅助决策和预测预后。放射基因组学是放射组学的延伸,涉及传统放射组学技术与基因组和转录组数据形式的分子分析的结合。在膀胱癌领域,有研究调查了放射组学和放射基因组学提名图在预测肿瘤分级、基因表达和肿瘤预后方面的开发、实施和效果,结果各不相同。我们的目的是对现有文献进行系统性回顾,调查基于放射组学的提名图的开发情况,以预测膀胱癌的肿瘤预后。 我们对 Medline、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 数据库进行了检索,截止日期为 2023 年 2 月 17 日。此外,还检索了灰色文献,以进一步确定其他合适的出版物。采用诊断准确性研究质量评估2和放射组学质量评分对纳入的研究进行了质量评估。 在所有纳入的研究中,放射基因组提名图在预测主要结果方面普遍表现良好。纳入研究的曲线下面积、灵敏度和特异性的中位数在训练集中分别为 0.83(0.63-0.973)、0.813 和 0.815,在验证集中分别为 0.75(0.702-0.838)、0.723 和 0.652。 多项研究证明了放射组学和放射基因组学模型在晚期盆腔肿瘤学中的预测潜力。为了进一步验证结果并在现代医学中推广应用,还需要在前瞻性环境中开展更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transperineal anastomotic urethroplasty with distal transection versus proximal transection: How to predict? An innovative and effective approach of cervical canal penetration in patients diagnosed with type II vaginal atresia with adequate uterine corpus development: a case series Efficacy of nonsolvent flower pollen extracts in healthy women with urinary incontinence: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study COVID-19 outbreak impact on urolithiasis treatments: A multicenter retrospective study across 9 urological centers A meta-analysis comparing treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with holmium laser enucleation and photoselective greenlight vaporization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1