Flexible work patterns and experiences of the work–family interface among Australian parents

IF 2.6 2区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Journal of Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1177/00221856231221637
Stacey Hokke, Simon Mason, Sharinne B. Crawford, A. Cooklin, Rebecca Giallo, S. Bennetts
{"title":"Flexible work patterns and experiences of the work–family interface among Australian parents","authors":"Stacey Hokke, Simon Mason, Sharinne B. Crawford, A. Cooklin, Rebecca Giallo, S. Bennetts","doi":"10.1177/00221856231221637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flexible work is often heralded as a key solution to the work–family ‘juggle’, yet evidence of its effectiveness is mixed, and few studies consider how parents combine flexible work options to balance work and care. This study aimed to examine the interplay between formal (employer-provided) and informal (self-directed) flexible work arrangements and identify usage patterns that support parents’ management of the work–family interface. We examined data from 3669 coupled Australian parents collected in 2016–2017. Using latent class analysis, we identified three distinct patterns of total flexibility use (low, moderate and high). Parents who were low users had the poorest work–family experiences, reporting higher work-to-family conflict, lower work–family enrichment and less balance than moderate or high users. However, high users experienced higher family-to-work conflict, and greater flexibility uptake did not ease perceptions of time pressure. Overall, findings demonstrate that formal and informal flexibility is a beneficial resource for mothers and fathers.","PeriodicalId":47100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Relations","volume":"40 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856231221637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flexible work is often heralded as a key solution to the work–family ‘juggle’, yet evidence of its effectiveness is mixed, and few studies consider how parents combine flexible work options to balance work and care. This study aimed to examine the interplay between formal (employer-provided) and informal (self-directed) flexible work arrangements and identify usage patterns that support parents’ management of the work–family interface. We examined data from 3669 coupled Australian parents collected in 2016–2017. Using latent class analysis, we identified three distinct patterns of total flexibility use (low, moderate and high). Parents who were low users had the poorest work–family experiences, reporting higher work-to-family conflict, lower work–family enrichment and less balance than moderate or high users. However, high users experienced higher family-to-work conflict, and greater flexibility uptake did not ease perceptions of time pressure. Overall, findings demonstrate that formal and informal flexibility is a beneficial resource for mothers and fathers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚父母的灵活工作模式和工作与家庭关系的体验
灵活工作常常被誉为解决工作与家庭 "冲突 "的关键方案,但其有效性的证据却参差不齐,很少有研究考虑父母如何结合灵活的工作选择来平衡工作与照顾。本研究旨在考察正式(雇主提供的)和非正式(自我指导的)灵活工作安排之间的相互作用,并确定支持父母处理工作与家庭关系的使用模式。我们研究了2016-2017年收集的3669名澳大利亚父母的数据。通过潜类分析,我们确定了三种不同的总体灵活性使用模式(低度、中度和高度)。与中度或高度使用者相比,低度使用者的父母在工作与家庭方面的体验最差,他们报告的工作与家庭之间的冲突更高,工作与家庭的丰富性更低,平衡性更差。然而,高使用者的家庭与工作之间的冲突更高,更多的灵活性并不能缓解时间压力。总之,研究结果表明,正式和非正式的灵活性对母亲和父亲来说是一种有益的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Relations
Journal of Industrial Relations INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
21.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Relations takes a broad interdisciplinary approach to the subject of the world of work. It welcomes contributions which examine the way individuals, groups, organisations and institutions shape the employment relationship. The Journal takes the view that comprehensive understanding of industrial relations must take into account economic, political and social influences on the power of capital and labour, and the interactions between employers, workers, their collective organisations and the state.
期刊最新文献
Between inclusion and disconnection: LGBTQ Workers and the challenge of union renewal. Reframing approaches to workplace violence towards Pacific homecare workers in New Zealand and Australia Indigenous workplace policies: the crucial role of Indigenous management Why are union members more willing to strike and protest than nonunion members? Evidence from Argentina and Chile Ironclad work overload: prevention of psychosocial hazards among union counsellors in Quebec
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1