Felipe Restrepo, Namrata Mali, Laura P Sands, Alan S. Abrahams, David M Goldberg, Richard Gruss, Nohel Zaman, Wendy Shields, Elise Omaki, Johnathon Ehsani, P. Ractham, L. Kaewkitipong
{"title":"Defective assistive device involvement in older adult Emergency Department visits","authors":"Felipe Restrepo, Namrata Mali, Laura P Sands, Alan S. Abrahams, David M Goldberg, Richard Gruss, Nohel Zaman, Wendy Shields, Elise Omaki, Johnathon Ehsani, P. Ractham, L. Kaewkitipong","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igad138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Many older adults adopt equipment to address physical limitations and reduce dependence on others to complete basic activities of daily living. Although a few prior studies have considered injuries associated with assistive devices for older adults, those studies focused on older adults’ health and functional risks for injury. There is limited analysis of older adult injuries involving defective or malfunctioning assistive devices.\n \n \n \n Data from this study are from the National Electronic Surveillance System All Injury Program (NEISS) which collected data on consumer product related injuries from a probability sample of 66 hospital Emergency Departments across the United States. Data from 30,776 older adult Emergency Department injury narratives from 2016 – 2020 were coded according to assistive device involved and whether malfunctioning led to injury. The study team manually examined all narratives in which the assistive device was coded to have malfunctioned.\n \n \n \n A total of 10,974 older adult Emergency Department cases were treated for 12,488 injuries involving a defective device. Injuries included 4,212 head and neck injuries (e.g., concussion), 4,317 trunk injuries (e.g., hip fractures), and 3,959 arm or leg injuries (e.g., leg fracture). Of these patients, 4,586 were admitted to a hospital ward for further evaluation and treatment. Seventy percent of these patients were injured while using a walker; in contrast wheelchairs were implicated in only four percent of the above cases. Design flaws were identified in 8,158 cases and part breakage/decoupling incidents in 2,816 cases.\n \n \n \n Our findings provide evidence that assistive devices are actively involved in older adult injuries. Further research is needed to reduce injuries associated with assistive devices by educating patients and their care providers about device use and assembly and developing effective methods for informing manufacturers about malfunctioning devices.\n","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"51 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many older adults adopt equipment to address physical limitations and reduce dependence on others to complete basic activities of daily living. Although a few prior studies have considered injuries associated with assistive devices for older adults, those studies focused on older adults’ health and functional risks for injury. There is limited analysis of older adult injuries involving defective or malfunctioning assistive devices.
Data from this study are from the National Electronic Surveillance System All Injury Program (NEISS) which collected data on consumer product related injuries from a probability sample of 66 hospital Emergency Departments across the United States. Data from 30,776 older adult Emergency Department injury narratives from 2016 – 2020 were coded according to assistive device involved and whether malfunctioning led to injury. The study team manually examined all narratives in which the assistive device was coded to have malfunctioned.
A total of 10,974 older adult Emergency Department cases were treated for 12,488 injuries involving a defective device. Injuries included 4,212 head and neck injuries (e.g., concussion), 4,317 trunk injuries (e.g., hip fractures), and 3,959 arm or leg injuries (e.g., leg fracture). Of these patients, 4,586 were admitted to a hospital ward for further evaluation and treatment. Seventy percent of these patients were injured while using a walker; in contrast wheelchairs were implicated in only four percent of the above cases. Design flaws were identified in 8,158 cases and part breakage/decoupling incidents in 2,816 cases.
Our findings provide evidence that assistive devices are actively involved in older adult injuries. Further research is needed to reduce injuries associated with assistive devices by educating patients and their care providers about device use and assembly and developing effective methods for informing manufacturers about malfunctioning devices.
期刊介绍:
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.