Improving the SNA: Alternative measures of output, input, income, and productivity

IF 1.9 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Review of Income and Wealth Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1111/roiw.12677
W. Diewert, Koji Nomura, C. Shimizu
{"title":"Improving the SNA: Alternative measures of output, input, income, and productivity","authors":"W. Diewert, Koji Nomura, C. Shimizu","doi":"10.1111/roiw.12677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current System of National Accounts (SNA) Gross Domestic Product (GDP) concept does not measure the income generated by the production sector since it includes depreciation and excludes capital gains and losses on assets used in the production sector. The paper suggests an accounting framework that measures the income generated by the production sector of an economy and implements this measure using the Augmented Productivity Database (APDB) developed by Asian Productivity Organization and Keio University for China over the years 1970–2020. Real gross and real net income generated by the Chinese production sector are decomposed into explanatory factors including TFP growth using the framework suggested by Jorgenson and Diewert and Morrison. TFP growth is further decomposed into technical progress and inefficiency components using the nonparametric approach developed by Diewert and Fox. The APDB has estimates for the price and quantity of agricultural, industrial, commercial, and residential land used in China. The paper argues that changes in land use should be treated in the same manner as inventory change and added to the alternative output measures. It turns out that Jorgensonian user costs for land are frequently negative. The problems associated with negative user costs are discussed in the paper.","PeriodicalId":47853,"journal":{"name":"Review of Income and Wealth","volume":"30 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Income and Wealth","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12677","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current System of National Accounts (SNA) Gross Domestic Product (GDP) concept does not measure the income generated by the production sector since it includes depreciation and excludes capital gains and losses on assets used in the production sector. The paper suggests an accounting framework that measures the income generated by the production sector of an economy and implements this measure using the Augmented Productivity Database (APDB) developed by Asian Productivity Organization and Keio University for China over the years 1970–2020. Real gross and real net income generated by the Chinese production sector are decomposed into explanatory factors including TFP growth using the framework suggested by Jorgenson and Diewert and Morrison. TFP growth is further decomposed into technical progress and inefficiency components using the nonparametric approach developed by Diewert and Fox. The APDB has estimates for the price and quantity of agricultural, industrial, commercial, and residential land used in China. The paper argues that changes in land use should be treated in the same manner as inventory change and added to the alternative output measures. It turns out that Jorgensonian user costs for land are frequently negative. The problems associated with negative user costs are discussed in the paper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进国民账户体系:产出、投入、收入和生产率的替代计量方法
现行国民账户体系(SNA)的国内生产总值(GDP)概念并不能衡量生产部门创造的收入,因为它包括折旧,不包括生产部门所用资产的资本损益。本文提出了一个衡量一个经济体生产部门创造的收入的核算框架,并利用亚洲生产力组织和庆应义塾大学为中国开发的 1970-2020 年增强生产力数据库(APDB)来实现这一衡量标准。利用 Jorgenson 和 Diewert 以及 Morrison 提出的框架,将中国生产部门产生的实际总收入和实际净收入分解为包括全要素生产率增长在内的解释因素。采用 Diewert 和 Fox 提出的非参数方法,将全要素生产率增长进一步分解为技术进步和低效率部分。APDB 对中国农业、工业、商业和住宅用地的价格和数量进行了估算。本文认为,土地利用的变化应与存量变化同等对待,并加入到替代产出计量中。事实证明,乔根森式的土地使用者成本经常是负的。本文讨论了与负用户成本相关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The major objective of the Review of Income and Wealth is to advance knowledge on the definition, measurement and interpretation of national income, wealth and distribution. Among the issues covered are: - national and social accounting - microdata analyses of issues related to income and wealth and its distribution - the integration of micro and macro systems of economic, financial, and social statistics - international and intertemporal comparisons of income, wealth, inequality, poverty, well-being, and productivity - related problems of measurement and methodology
期刊最新文献
The Effect of the Covid‐19 Pandemic on Inequality Using machine learning to unveil the predictors of intergenerational mobility Monitoring Poverty in a Data‐Deprived Environment: The Case of Lebanon Assessing Income Convergence with a Long‐run Forecasting Approach: Some New Results The increase in earnings inequality in Italy: The role and persistence of atypical contracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1