Ergonomic Risk Assessment and Fatigue Analysis During Manual Lifting Tasks in Farming Activities

K. S. R. V. Teja, S. Mohan, Ganesh Patel, S. Sivapirakasam, Rahul M.
{"title":"Ergonomic Risk Assessment and Fatigue Analysis During Manual Lifting Tasks in Farming Activities","authors":"K. S. R. V. Teja, S. Mohan, Ganesh Patel, S. Sivapirakasam, Rahul M.","doi":"10.3126/ijosh.v14i1.56148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Farming is a physically demanding occupation that puts farmers at risk of musculoskeletal disorders, particularly when frequently performing activities like heavy lifting, which strains the lower back muscles. The present study aimed to assess the ergonomic risk and fatigue during manual lifting tasks pertaining to farming activities.\nMethods: A study was performed on 20 farmers to analyze the ergonomic risks associated with load lifting through the estimation of the Recommended Weight Limit and Lifting Index using the revised NIOSH lifting equation. The low back compression forces of the participants were estimated using the 3DSSPP software. Surface electromyography was employed to analyze the onset of muscle fatigue during the lifting activity.\nResults: The results of the study showed a 111.12% increase in the recommended weight limit, a 52.77% reduction in lifting index, and a 28.15% reduction in the low back compression forces for the redesigned lifting technique. The average low-back compression force for the redesigned technique was observed to be well below the back compression design limit of 770 lb. A reduction in the slope of the RMS voltage regression line by 60% and a reduction of 50.23% in the peak spectral power of the sEMG signal, accompanied by a shift in the peak spectral power towards higher frequency region indicated delayed onset of fatigue for the redesigned technique.\nConclusion: The outcomes of the study indicated that the ergonomic redesign of the lifting task could significantly reduce the lifting index and alleviate the spinal compression forces well within the back-compression design limit. The redesign was also found to delay the onset of fatigue in the erector spinae muscles.","PeriodicalId":34250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ijosh.v14i1.56148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Farming is a physically demanding occupation that puts farmers at risk of musculoskeletal disorders, particularly when frequently performing activities like heavy lifting, which strains the lower back muscles. The present study aimed to assess the ergonomic risk and fatigue during manual lifting tasks pertaining to farming activities. Methods: A study was performed on 20 farmers to analyze the ergonomic risks associated with load lifting through the estimation of the Recommended Weight Limit and Lifting Index using the revised NIOSH lifting equation. The low back compression forces of the participants were estimated using the 3DSSPP software. Surface electromyography was employed to analyze the onset of muscle fatigue during the lifting activity. Results: The results of the study showed a 111.12% increase in the recommended weight limit, a 52.77% reduction in lifting index, and a 28.15% reduction in the low back compression forces for the redesigned lifting technique. The average low-back compression force for the redesigned technique was observed to be well below the back compression design limit of 770 lb. A reduction in the slope of the RMS voltage regression line by 60% and a reduction of 50.23% in the peak spectral power of the sEMG signal, accompanied by a shift in the peak spectral power towards higher frequency region indicated delayed onset of fatigue for the redesigned technique. Conclusion: The outcomes of the study indicated that the ergonomic redesign of the lifting task could significantly reduce the lifting index and alleviate the spinal compression forces well within the back-compression design limit. The redesign was also found to delay the onset of fatigue in the erector spinae muscles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农业活动中人工搬运任务的人体工学风险评估和疲劳分析
导言:务农是一项需要大量体力的职业,使农民面临肌肉骨骼疾病的风险,尤其是在经常进行重物搬运等活动时,会使腰部肌肉紧张。本研究旨在评估与农活有关的人工搬运任务中的人体工程学风险和疲劳:对 20 名农民进行了一项研究,通过使用修订后的 NIOSH 提举公式估算建议重量限制和提举指数,分析与提举负荷相关的人体工学风险。使用 3DSSPP 软件估算了参与者的腰背压缩力。采用表面肌电图分析提举活动中肌肉疲劳的发生情况:研究结果表明,重新设计的移位技术的建议重量限制提高了 111.12%,移位指数降低了 52.77%,腰背压缩力降低了 28.15%。重新设计的技术的平均腰背压缩力远低于 770 磅的腰背压缩设计限值。有效值电压回归线的斜率降低了 60%,sEMG 信号的峰值频谱功率降低了 50.23%,同时峰值频谱功率向高频区域移动,这表明重新设计的技术延迟了疲劳的发生:研究结果表明,按照人体工程学原理重新设计的提举任务可显著降低提举指数,并在背部压缩设计限度内减轻脊柱压缩力。研究还发现,重新设计还能延缓竖脊肌疲劳的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation and implication of noise and vibration levels to the operators and proxy population around selected block molding industries in Ibadan, Nigeria Knowledge, Attitude and Practices (KAP) regarding hearing health and noise-induced hearing loss among folk/light music professionals from Chennai Implementation of National Health Insurance Scheme for Civil/Public Servants in Nigeria Aviation Podiatry - What place does podiatry have in aerospace medicine? Assessment of work-life balance among married female healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital of Chengalpattu district, Tamil Nadu: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1