Clinical utilization of generic drugs and biosimilars for ulcerative colitis treatment: Insights from a nationwide database study in Japan

Q2 Medicine Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI:10.1159/000536146
Rintaro Moroi, Y. Kakuta, Hiroshi Nagai, Yusuke Shimoyama, Takeo Naito, H. Shiga, Y. Kinouchi, Atsushi Masamune
{"title":"Clinical utilization of generic drugs and biosimilars for ulcerative colitis treatment: Insights from a nationwide database study in Japan","authors":"Rintaro Moroi, Y. Kakuta, Hiroshi Nagai, Yusuke Shimoyama, Takeo Naito, H. Shiga, Y. Kinouchi, Atsushi Masamune","doi":"10.1159/000536146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Limited data exist regarding the prevalence and clinical practice involving generic drugs and biosimilars for treating ulcerative colitis (UC) in Japan. We aimed to clarify the clinical usage of these generic drugs and biosimilars for UC treatment in Japan using a nationwide database.\nMethods: We collected data from 30,675 UC cases, along with their prescriptions for both generic drugs or biosimilars and their original counterparts, using a medical claims database provided by DeSC Healthcare, Inc. We calculated the prescription and penetration rates of generic drugs and biosimilars and demonstrated the transition of these rates. Additionally, the cumulative retention rates between infliximab originator and biosimilar were compared using the Kaplan–Meier method.\nResults: The prescription rate of generic mesalazine increased from approximately 10% in 2015 to over 30% in 2021. Although the prescription rate of generic molecular targeting drugs (MTDs) also increased from approximately 0.15% in 2014 to 2.5% in 2021, the increment was lower than that of generic mesalazine. The penetration rates of generic 5-aminosalicylic acid and tacrolimus ranged from over 30% to approximately 50%. Infliximab biosimilar achieved an approximate 20% penetration rate, whereas adalimumab achieved< 5%. The cumulative retention rates did not differ between infliximab originator and biosimilar.\nConclusions: The penetration rates of generics and biosimilars for UC treatment are relatively low compared with those for treatment in other fields and the goal of Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. Several countermeasures are necessary for the widespread use of generics and biosimilars, ultimately contributing to cost-effective and sustainable healthcare delivery. \n","PeriodicalId":13605,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Limited data exist regarding the prevalence and clinical practice involving generic drugs and biosimilars for treating ulcerative colitis (UC) in Japan. We aimed to clarify the clinical usage of these generic drugs and biosimilars for UC treatment in Japan using a nationwide database. Methods: We collected data from 30,675 UC cases, along with their prescriptions for both generic drugs or biosimilars and their original counterparts, using a medical claims database provided by DeSC Healthcare, Inc. We calculated the prescription and penetration rates of generic drugs and biosimilars and demonstrated the transition of these rates. Additionally, the cumulative retention rates between infliximab originator and biosimilar were compared using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: The prescription rate of generic mesalazine increased from approximately 10% in 2015 to over 30% in 2021. Although the prescription rate of generic molecular targeting drugs (MTDs) also increased from approximately 0.15% in 2014 to 2.5% in 2021, the increment was lower than that of generic mesalazine. The penetration rates of generic 5-aminosalicylic acid and tacrolimus ranged from over 30% to approximately 50%. Infliximab biosimilar achieved an approximate 20% penetration rate, whereas adalimumab achieved< 5%. The cumulative retention rates did not differ between infliximab originator and biosimilar. Conclusions: The penetration rates of generics and biosimilars for UC treatment are relatively low compared with those for treatment in other fields and the goal of Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. Several countermeasures are necessary for the widespread use of generics and biosimilars, ultimately contributing to cost-effective and sustainable healthcare delivery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗溃疡性结肠炎的仿制药和生物仿制药的临床使用情况:日本全国数据库研究的启示
简介:有关日本治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的非专利药和生物仿制药的流行程度和临床实践的数据有限。我们的目的是利用一个全国性数据库,明确这些治疗溃疡性结肠炎的仿制药和生物仿制药在日本的临床使用情况:我们利用 DeSC Healthcare, Inc. 提供的医疗索赔数据库收集了 30,675 例 UC 病例的数据,以及他们对仿制药或生物仿制药及其原研药的处方。我们计算了仿制药和生物仿制药的处方率和渗透率,并展示了这些比率的过渡情况。此外,我们还使用 Kaplan-Meier 法比较了英夫利西单抗原研药和生物仿制药的累积保留率:结果:美沙拉嗪仿制药的处方率从 2015 年的约 10%增至 2021 年的 30%以上。虽然分子靶向药物(MTDs)仿制药的处方率也从2014年的约0.15%增至2021年的2.5%,但增幅低于美沙拉嗪仿制药。5-氨基水杨酸和他克莫司仿制药的渗透率从30%以上到50%左右不等。英夫利西单抗生物仿制药的渗透率约为 20%,而阿达木单抗的渗透率低于 5%。英夫利西单抗原研药和生物仿制药的累积保留率没有差异:结论:与其他领域的治疗相比,仿制药和生物仿制药在治疗 UC 方面的渗透率相对较低,这也是厚生劳动省的目标。为了广泛使用仿制药和生物仿制药,有必要采取一些对策,最终为提供具有成本效益和可持续的医疗服务做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases
Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Role of Esophageal Physiologic Tests in Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Carotegrast Methyl in Japanese Patients with Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis. Perceptions and Responses to Diseases among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Text Mining Analysis of Posts on a Japanese Patient Community Website. Impact of Concomitant Prescriptions and Lifestyle Factors on the Initial Course of Newly Diagnosed Inflammatory Bowel Disease. A Real-World Comparison of Drug Trough Levels between Patients Experiencing a Secondary Nonimmune Loss of Response and Those Maintaining a Response to Infliximab on Long-Term Maintenance Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1