From EU battlegroups to Rapid Deployment Capacity: learning the right lessons?

IF 3.9 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Affairs Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI:10.1093/ia/iiad247
Christoph O Meyer, Ton Van Osch, Y. Reykers
{"title":"From EU battlegroups to Rapid Deployment Capacity: learning the right lessons?","authors":"Christoph O Meyer, Ton Van Osch, Y. Reykers","doi":"10.1093/ia/iiad247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The article uses the case of the development of the European Union Battlegroups to the Rapid Deployment Capacity (RDC) to better understand the changing learning capacity of the EU in its military Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). The article develops a theoretical framework to capture the most significant factors affecting learning by drawing on insights from the literatures on organizational learning and policy failure, with a specific focus on military organizations and CSDP. This framework is then used to study to what degree the EU has learnt the right lessons from the creeping failure of the Battlegroups, which factors affected learning, and to what degree the EU suffers from specific learning pathologies. The article draws on elite interviews, secondary and grey literature, and the high-level practitioner experience of one author. It finds that the EU has improved its learning capacities and correctly identified most of the military-operational root causes of the failure, yet struggled to correctly identify or address the political–strategic ones. This article offers insights to practitioners on where to best target efforts to improve learning. The theoretical framework could help to illuminate the challenges of political–military learning in multi-national regional organizations under difficult epistemic conditions.","PeriodicalId":48162,"journal":{"name":"International Affairs","volume":"28 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad247","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article uses the case of the development of the European Union Battlegroups to the Rapid Deployment Capacity (RDC) to better understand the changing learning capacity of the EU in its military Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). The article develops a theoretical framework to capture the most significant factors affecting learning by drawing on insights from the literatures on organizational learning and policy failure, with a specific focus on military organizations and CSDP. This framework is then used to study to what degree the EU has learnt the right lessons from the creeping failure of the Battlegroups, which factors affected learning, and to what degree the EU suffers from specific learning pathologies. The article draws on elite interviews, secondary and grey literature, and the high-level practitioner experience of one author. It finds that the EU has improved its learning capacities and correctly identified most of the military-operational root causes of the failure, yet struggled to correctly identify or address the political–strategic ones. This article offers insights to practitioners on where to best target efforts to improve learning. The theoretical framework could help to illuminate the challenges of political–military learning in multi-national regional organizations under difficult epistemic conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从欧盟战斗群到快速部署能力:吸取正确的经验教训?
文章以欧盟战斗群发展到快速部署能力(RDC)为案例,更好地理解欧盟在其军事共同安全与防务政策(CSDP)中不断变化的学习能力。文章借鉴有关组织学习和政策失败的文献中的见解,建立了一个理论框架来捕捉影响学习的最重要因素,并特别关注军事组织和 CSDP。然后利用这一框架来研究欧盟在多大程度上从 "战斗群 "的逐步失败中吸取了正确的教训,哪些因素影响了学习,以及欧盟在多大程度上患有特定的学习病症。文章借鉴了精英访谈、二手文献和灰色文献,以及一位作者的高层实践经验。文章发现,欧盟已提高了学习能力,并正确识别了失败的大部分军事行动根源,但却难以正确识别或解决政治战略根源。这篇文章为实践者提供了改进学习的最佳努力方向。该理论框架有助于阐明多国区域组织在困难的认识论条件下开展政治-军事学习所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Affairs
International Affairs INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
24.40%
发文量
255
期刊介绍: International Affairs is Britain"s leading journal of international relations. Founded by and edited at Chatham House, the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London, it has not only developed a much valued insight into European policy debates but has also become renowned for its coverage of global policy issues. Mixing commissioned and unsolicited articles from the biggest names in international relations this lively, provocative journal will keep you up-to-date with critical thinking on the key issues shaping world economic and political change.
期刊最新文献
Alicia Moreau's socialist feminism on war: transcending western narratives? ASEAN, Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the politics of pragmatism The ethics of engaged scholarship in a complex world The Oxford handbook of history and international relations Alva Myrdal: a pioneer in nuclear disarmament
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1