Investigating responses to US drone strikes in Yemen using Twitter data

Evan Weiss, Violet Ross, Alex Lyford
{"title":"Investigating responses to US drone strikes in Yemen using Twitter data","authors":"Evan Weiss, Violet Ross, Alex Lyford","doi":"10.1177/17506352231219694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As part of the War on Terror, the US conducted at least 378 air and drone strikes in Yemen from 2002 to 2023. While primarily targeting members of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), these strikes have killed over 1,000 people, including more than 125 civilians. This research aims to understand the broader societal impact of US military action as shown on Twitter, now known as ‘X’. The authors take a mixed-methods approach, using both qualitative and quantitative data to investigate this impact. They perform word- and tweet-level analyses on the content and sentiment of a subset of Yemeni Twitter users and contrast the content of Yemeni users’ tweets about US drone strikes with that of US users’ tweets. Finally, the article quantifies the temporal relationship between the frequency and severity of US drone strikes and Twitter activity levels in Yemen, considering the prevalence of Twitter bots.","PeriodicalId":503711,"journal":{"name":"Media, War & Conflict","volume":"56 48","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media, War & Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352231219694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As part of the War on Terror, the US conducted at least 378 air and drone strikes in Yemen from 2002 to 2023. While primarily targeting members of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), these strikes have killed over 1,000 people, including more than 125 civilians. This research aims to understand the broader societal impact of US military action as shown on Twitter, now known as ‘X’. The authors take a mixed-methods approach, using both qualitative and quantitative data to investigate this impact. They perform word- and tweet-level analyses on the content and sentiment of a subset of Yemeni Twitter users and contrast the content of Yemeni users’ tweets about US drone strikes with that of US users’ tweets. Finally, the article quantifies the temporal relationship between the frequency and severity of US drone strikes and Twitter activity levels in Yemen, considering the prevalence of Twitter bots.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用推特数据调查对美国无人机空袭也门的反应
作为反恐战争的一部分,从 2002 年到 2023 年,美国在也门进行了至少 378 次空袭和无人机袭击。这些空袭主要针对阿拉伯半岛基地组织(AQAP)成员,造成 1000 多人死亡,其中包括 125 名平民。本研究旨在了解美国军事行动在 Twitter(即现在的 "X")上所产生的更广泛的社会影响。作者采用混合方法,同时使用定性和定量数据来研究这种影响。他们对也门 Twitter 用户子集的内容和情感进行了单词和推文层面的分析,并将也门用户关于美国无人机空袭的推文内容与美国用户的推文内容进行了对比。最后,考虑到推特机器人的盛行,文章量化了美国无人机空袭的频率和严重程度与也门推特活动水平之间的时间关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Narratives of conflict: Russian media’s evolving treatment of Ukraine (2013–2022) Nuclear anxiety as an instrument of war: The use of news media to shape and respond to the disinformation campaign surrounding the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant The named and the nameless: A comparative analysis of US and UK news coverage of civilian deaths caused by US drone strikes, 2009–2016 From silence to Pride? A feminist visual narrative analysis of the Swedish Armed Forces’ Pride campaigns A comparative analysis of strategic narratives and persuasive language techniques within Iranian and US news media: The study of the joint comprehensive plan of action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1