Wind tunnel and numerical study of outdoor particle dispersion around a low-rise building model

Runmin Zhao, Junjie Liu, Nan Jiang, Sumei Liu
{"title":"Wind tunnel and numerical study of outdoor particle dispersion around a low-rise building model","authors":"Runmin Zhao,&nbsp;Junjie Liu,&nbsp;Nan Jiang,&nbsp;Sumei Liu","doi":"10.1007/s44223-023-00045-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The dispersion of particulate pollutants around buildings raises concerns due to adverse health impacts. Accurate prediction of particle dispersion is important for evaluating health risks in urban areas. However, rigorous validation data using particulate tracers is lacking for numerical models of urban dispersion. Many prior studies rely on gas dispersion data, questioning conclusions due to differences in transport physics. To address this gap, this study utilized a combined experimental and computational approach to generate comprehensive validation data on particulate dispersion. A wind tunnel experiment using particulate tracers measured airflow, turbulence, and particle concentrations around a single building, providing reliable but sparse data. Validated large eddy simulation expanded the data. This combined approach generated much-needed validation data to evaluate numerical particle dispersion models around buildings. Steady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (SRANS) simulations paired with Lagrangian particle tracking (LPT), and drift-flux (DF) models were validated. SRANS had lower accuracy compared to LES for airflow and turbulence. However, in this case, SRANS inaccuracies did not prevent accurate concentration prediction when LPT or a Stokes drift-flux model were used. The algebraic drift-flux model strongly overpredicted the concentration for large micron particles, indicating proper drift modeling was essential.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72270,"journal":{"name":"Architectural intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44223-023-00045-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architectural intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44223-023-00045-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dispersion of particulate pollutants around buildings raises concerns due to adverse health impacts. Accurate prediction of particle dispersion is important for evaluating health risks in urban areas. However, rigorous validation data using particulate tracers is lacking for numerical models of urban dispersion. Many prior studies rely on gas dispersion data, questioning conclusions due to differences in transport physics. To address this gap, this study utilized a combined experimental and computational approach to generate comprehensive validation data on particulate dispersion. A wind tunnel experiment using particulate tracers measured airflow, turbulence, and particle concentrations around a single building, providing reliable but sparse data. Validated large eddy simulation expanded the data. This combined approach generated much-needed validation data to evaluate numerical particle dispersion models around buildings. Steady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (SRANS) simulations paired with Lagrangian particle tracking (LPT), and drift-flux (DF) models were validated. SRANS had lower accuracy compared to LES for airflow and turbulence. However, in this case, SRANS inaccuracies did not prevent accurate concentration prediction when LPT or a Stokes drift-flux model were used. The algebraic drift-flux model strongly overpredicted the concentration for large micron particles, indicating proper drift modeling was essential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低层建筑模型周围室外颗粒扩散的风洞和数值研究
建筑物周围的颗粒污染物弥散会对健康产生不利影响,因此引起了人们的关注。准确预测颗粒物的扩散对评估城市地区的健康风险非常重要。然而,城市扩散的数值模型缺乏使用颗粒示踪剂的严格验证数据。之前的许多研究都依赖于气体扩散数据,但由于传输物理学的差异,这些研究的结论受到质疑。为了弥补这一不足,本研究采用了实验和计算相结合的方法来生成颗粒物扩散的综合验证数据。使用微粒示踪剂的风洞实验测量了单栋建筑周围的气流、湍流和微粒浓度,提供了可靠但稀少的数据。经过验证的大涡流模拟扩展了数据。这种综合方法产生了急需的验证数据,用于评估建筑物周围的颗粒物数值扩散模型。稳定的雷诺平均纳维-斯托克斯(SRANS)模拟与拉格朗日粒子跟踪(LPT)和漂移-通量(DF)模型进行了配对验证。在气流和湍流方面,SRANS 的精度低于 LES。然而,在这种情况下,当使用 LPT 或斯托克斯漂流模型时,SRANS 的不准确性并不妨碍准确的浓度预测。代数漂流模型对大微米颗粒的浓度预测严重过高,这表明适当的漂流模型是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A review on the mathematical models of thermostatically controlled load The PreDI matrix-a common terminology for offsite construction: definition, verification, and demonstration in environmental impact studies Making the Hypar Up pavilion: (in)efficiencies of upcycling surplus timber products Phygital intelligence Emerging technologies in urban design pedagogy: augmented reality applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1