Reformulation of Decision-making System in ASEAN

Q3 Social Sciences Hasanuddin Law Review Pub Date : 2024-01-02 DOI:10.20956/halrev.v9i3.4912
Ahmad Syofyan, Siti Azizah, Shaker Suleiman Ali Al Akayleh, Oksha Dwi Anugrah Panjaitan, Daffa Ladro Kusworo
{"title":"Reformulation of Decision-making System in ASEAN","authors":"Ahmad Syofyan, Siti Azizah, Shaker Suleiman Ali Al Akayleh, Oksha Dwi Anugrah Panjaitan, Daffa Ladro Kusworo","doi":"10.20956/halrev.v9i3.4912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ASEAN is a regional organization for Southeast Asia that was established on 8 August 1967 by five ASEAN countries at the time, namely Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines. Today, ASEAN has eleven members with Timor Leste as the youngest member. Like any other international organization, ASEAN has its own decision-making system. The decision-making system in ASEAN before the Charter was only consultation and consensus. That is, decision making based on the agreement of all members and can only be decided if no one refuses, this refers to the Bangkok Declaration. Meanwhile, after the establishment of the 2007 ASEAN Charter, there is a new decision-making system, namely ASEAN Minus-X. A decision-making system that does not rely on the approval of all its members, so that a policy can be decided even if only approved by a few members. This decision-making system can only be done in the economic field. From these two decision-making systems, there are several challenges that exist so that new ideas emerge to reformulate the decision-making system in ASEAN, which is considered relevant to the times and can accommodate all the interests of ASEAN members.","PeriodicalId":30743,"journal":{"name":"Hasanuddin Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hasanuddin Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v9i3.4912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ASEAN is a regional organization for Southeast Asia that was established on 8 August 1967 by five ASEAN countries at the time, namely Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines. Today, ASEAN has eleven members with Timor Leste as the youngest member. Like any other international organization, ASEAN has its own decision-making system. The decision-making system in ASEAN before the Charter was only consultation and consensus. That is, decision making based on the agreement of all members and can only be decided if no one refuses, this refers to the Bangkok Declaration. Meanwhile, after the establishment of the 2007 ASEAN Charter, there is a new decision-making system, namely ASEAN Minus-X. A decision-making system that does not rely on the approval of all its members, so that a policy can be decided even if only approved by a few members. This decision-making system can only be done in the economic field. From these two decision-making systems, there are several challenges that exist so that new ideas emerge to reformulate the decision-making system in ASEAN, which is considered relevant to the times and can accommodate all the interests of ASEAN members.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新制定东盟的决策系统
东盟是东南亚的一个区域组织,由当时的五个东盟国家(即印度尼西亚、新加坡、马来西亚、泰国和菲律宾)于 1967 年 8 月 8 日成立。如今,东盟有 11 个成员国,东帝汶是最年轻的成员国。与其他国际组织一样,东盟也有自己的决策系统。在《宪章》之前,东盟的决策系统只是协商和共识。即在全体成员同意的基础上进行决策,只有在无人拒绝的情况下才能做出决定,这指的就是《曼谷宣言》。与此同时,2007 年《东盟宪章》制定后,出现了一种新的决策体系,即 "东盟减 X"(ASEAN Minus-X)。这种决策制度不依赖于所有成员的批准,即使只有少数成员批准,也可以决定一项政策。这种决策体系只能在经济领域进行。从这两种决策体系来看,存在着一些挑战,因此需要提出新的想法来重新制定东盟的决策体系,使其符合时代的要求,并能兼顾东盟所有成员的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hasanuddin Law Review
Hasanuddin Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Armed Conflict under International Law Artificial Intelligence and Administrative Justice: An Analysis of Predictive Justice in France Strengthening National Regulations in Combating Cross-Border Trafficking: Empirical Approach and the Way Forward Navigating Ambiguity: Critiques of Indonesia's Health Law and its Impact on Legal Redress for Medical Malpractice Victims The Constitutionality of Inheritance Rights for Extramarital Children: Assessing the Legal Response under Balinese Customary Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1