Heart Failure Readmission in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Active Cancer

IF 12 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Jacc: Cardiooncology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jaccao.2023.10.011
Mohamed Dafaalla MSc , Dmitry Abramov MD , Harriette G.C. Van Spall MD , Arjun K. Ghosh PhD , Chris P. Gale PhD , Sarah Zaman PhD , Muhammad Rashid PhD , Mamas A. Mamas DPhil
{"title":"Heart Failure Readmission in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Active Cancer","authors":"Mohamed Dafaalla MSc ,&nbsp;Dmitry Abramov MD ,&nbsp;Harriette G.C. Van Spall MD ,&nbsp;Arjun K. Ghosh PhD ,&nbsp;Chris P. Gale PhD ,&nbsp;Sarah Zaman PhD ,&nbsp;Muhammad Rashid PhD ,&nbsp;Mamas A. Mamas DPhil","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccao.2023.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although numerous studies have examined readmission with heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), limited data are available on HF readmission in cancer patients post-AMI.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to assess the rates and factors associated with HF readmission in cancer patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A nationally linked cohort of STEMI patients between January 2005 and March 2019 were obtained from the UK Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project registry and the UK national Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care registry. Multivariable Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to evaluate HF readmission at 30 days and 1 year.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 326,551 STEMI indexed admissions were included, with 7,090 (2.2%) patients having active cancer. The cancer group was less likely to be admitted under the care of a cardiologist (74.5% vs 81.9%) and had lower rates of invasive coronary angiography (62.2% vs 72.7%; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (58.4% vs. 69.5%). There was a significant prescription gap in the administration of post-AMI medications upon discharge such as an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (49.5% vs 71.1%) and beta-blockers (58.4% vs 68.0%) in cancer patients. The cancer group had a higher rate of HF readmission at 30 days (3.2% vs 2.3%) and 1 year (9.4% vs 7.3%). However, after adjustment, cancer was not independently associated with HF readmission at 30 days (subdistribution HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.86-1.28) or 1 year (subdistribution HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.92-1.16). The opportunity-based quality indicator was associated with higher rates of HF readmission independent of cancer diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Cancer patients receive care that differs in important ways from patients without cancer. Greater implementation of evidence-based care may reduce HF readmissions, including in cancer patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48499,"journal":{"name":"Jacc: Cardiooncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266608732300354X/pdfft?md5=a1df754389cdf8e3f9b6501308a58261&pid=1-s2.0-S266608732300354X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jacc: Cardiooncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266608732300354X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although numerous studies have examined readmission with heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), limited data are available on HF readmission in cancer patients post-AMI.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the rates and factors associated with HF readmission in cancer patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods

A nationally linked cohort of STEMI patients between January 2005 and March 2019 were obtained from the UK Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project registry and the UK national Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care registry. Multivariable Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to evaluate HF readmission at 30 days and 1 year.

Results

A total of 326,551 STEMI indexed admissions were included, with 7,090 (2.2%) patients having active cancer. The cancer group was less likely to be admitted under the care of a cardiologist (74.5% vs 81.9%) and had lower rates of invasive coronary angiography (62.2% vs 72.7%; P < 0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (58.4% vs. 69.5%). There was a significant prescription gap in the administration of post-AMI medications upon discharge such as an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (49.5% vs 71.1%) and beta-blockers (58.4% vs 68.0%) in cancer patients. The cancer group had a higher rate of HF readmission at 30 days (3.2% vs 2.3%) and 1 year (9.4% vs 7.3%). However, after adjustment, cancer was not independently associated with HF readmission at 30 days (subdistribution HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.86-1.28) or 1 year (subdistribution HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.92-1.16). The opportunity-based quality indicator was associated with higher rates of HF readmission independent of cancer diagnosis.

Conclusions

Cancer patients receive care that differs in important ways from patients without cancer. Greater implementation of evidence-based care may reduce HF readmissions, including in cancer patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ST段抬高型心肌梗死和癌症活动期患者的心衰再住院率
背景虽然许多研究都对急性心肌梗死(AMI)后心力衰竭(HF)再入院进行了调查,但有关AMI后癌症患者HF再入院的数据却很有限。方法2005年1月至2019年3月期间的STEMI患者全国联网队列来自英国心肌梗死国家审计项目登记处和英国全国医院事件统计入院患者护理登记处。结果共纳入326551例STEMI索引入院患者,其中7090例(2.2%)患者患有活动性癌症。癌症组患者接受心脏病专家治疗的可能性较低(74.5% 对 81.9%),接受侵入性冠状动脉造影术(62.2% 对 72.7%;P < 0.001)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(58.4% 对 69.5%)的比例较低。癌症患者在出院后服用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(49.5% vs 71.1%)和β-受体阻滞剂(58.4% vs 68.0%)等急性心肌梗死后药物方面存在明显的处方差距。癌症组患者在 30 天(3.2% 对 2.3%)和 1 年(9.4% 对 7.3%)内的高血压再入院率较高。然而,经过调整后,癌症与 30 天(次分布 HR:1.05;95% CI:0.86-1.28)或 1 年(次分布 HR:1.03;95% CI:0.92-1.16)的高血压再入院率并无独立关联。基于机会的质量指标与较高的高频再入院率相关,与癌症诊断无关。加大循证护理的实施力度可减少包括癌症患者在内的高血压再入院率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
6.30%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: JACC: CardioOncology is a specialized journal that belongs to the esteemed Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) family. Its purpose is to enhance cardiovascular care for cancer patients by publishing high-quality, innovative scientific research and sharing evidence-based knowledge. The journal aims to revolutionize the field of cardio-oncology and actively involve and educate professionals in both cardiovascular and oncology fields. It covers a wide range of topics including pre-clinical, translational, and clinical research, as well as best practices in cardio-oncology. Key areas of focus include understanding disease mechanisms, utilizing in vitro and in vivo models, exploring novel and traditional therapeutics (across Phase I-IV trials), studying epidemiology, employing precision medicine, and investigating primary and secondary prevention. Amyloidosis, cardiovascular risk factors, heart failure, and vascular disease are some examples of the disease states that are of particular interest to the journal. However, it welcomes research on other relevant conditions as well.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Correction Cardiovascular Considerations Before Cancer Therapy Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity in Adult Cancer Patients Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Preclinical Cardiotoxicity Screening in Cardio-Oncology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1