Adherence Promotion With Tailored Motivational Messages: Proof of Concept and Message Preferences in Older Adults

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23337214231224571
Shenghao Zhang, Michael Dieciuc, Andrew T. Dilanchian, Mia Lustria, Dawn Carr, Neil Charness, Zhe He, W. Boot
{"title":"Adherence Promotion With Tailored Motivational Messages: Proof of Concept and Message Preferences in Older Adults","authors":"Shenghao Zhang, Michael Dieciuc, Andrew T. Dilanchian, Mia Lustria, Dawn Carr, Neil Charness, Zhe He, W. Boot","doi":"10.1177/23337214231224571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the feasibility of using tailored text messages to promote adherence to longitudinal protocols and determined what facets of text message tone influence motivation. Forty-three older adults (Mage = 73.21, SD = 5.37) were recruited to engage in video-game-based cognitive training for 10 consecutive days. Participants received encouraging text messages each morning that matched their highest or lowest ranking reasons for participating in the study, after which they rated how effective each message was in motivating them to play the games that day. After 10 days, participants rated all possible messages and participated in semi-structured interviews to elicit their preferences for these messages. Results showed that messages matching participants’ reasons for participating were more motivating than mismatched messages. Further, participants preferred messages that were personalized (i.e., use second person voice) and in formal tones. Messages consistent with these preferences were also rated as more motivating. These findings establish the feasibility of using message tailoring to promote adherence to longitudinal protocols and the relevance of tailoring messages to be personal and formal.","PeriodicalId":52146,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine","volume":"29 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214231224571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the feasibility of using tailored text messages to promote adherence to longitudinal protocols and determined what facets of text message tone influence motivation. Forty-three older adults (Mage = 73.21, SD = 5.37) were recruited to engage in video-game-based cognitive training for 10 consecutive days. Participants received encouraging text messages each morning that matched their highest or lowest ranking reasons for participating in the study, after which they rated how effective each message was in motivating them to play the games that day. After 10 days, participants rated all possible messages and participated in semi-structured interviews to elicit their preferences for these messages. Results showed that messages matching participants’ reasons for participating were more motivating than mismatched messages. Further, participants preferred messages that were personalized (i.e., use second person voice) and in formal tones. Messages consistent with these preferences were also rated as more motivating. These findings establish the feasibility of using message tailoring to promote adherence to longitudinal protocols and the relevance of tailoring messages to be personal and formal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过量身定制的激励信息促进坚持治疗:概念验证与老年人的信息偏好
本研究考察了使用定制短信促进坚持纵向协议的可行性,并确定了短信语气对动机的影响。研究招募了 43 名老年人(平均年龄为 73.21 岁,最小年龄为 5.37 岁)参加连续 10 天的基于视频游戏的认知训练。参与者每天早上都会收到与他们参与研究的最高或最低理由相匹配的鼓励性短信,之后他们会对每条短信在激励他们当天玩游戏方面的效果进行评分。10 天后,参与者对所有可能的短信进行评分,并参加半结构化访谈,以了解他们对这些短信的偏好。结果显示,与参与者参与游戏的原因相匹配的信息比不匹配的信息更能激发参与者的积极性。此外,参与者更喜欢个性化(即使用第二人称声音)和正式语调的信息。与这些偏好一致的信息也被评为更具激励性。这些研究结果证明了使用信息定制来促进参与者遵守纵向协议的可行性,以及信息定制的个性化和正式性的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine (GGM) is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed open access journal where scholars from a variety of disciplines present their work focusing on the psychological, behavioral, social, and biological aspects of aging, and public health services and research related to aging. The journal addresses a wide variety of topics related to health services research in gerontology and geriatrics. GGM seeks to be one of the world’s premier Open Access outlets for gerontological academic research. As such, GGM does not limit content due to page budgets or thematic significance. Papers will be subjected to rigorous peer review but will be selected solely on the basis of whether the research is sound and deserves publication. By virtue of not restricting papers to a narrow discipline, GGM facilitates the discovery of the connections between papers.
期刊最新文献
Directions of Longitudinal Relationships between Housing-related Control Beliefs and Activities of Daily Living among People with Parkinson's disease. Behavioral Activation Therapy for Depression Led by Health Personnel in Older People: A Scoping Review. Increased Steps in Japanese Older Adults Associated with Improved Winter Sleep Quality. Understanding the Impact of COVID-19 Lockdowns on Older Adults' Routines and Well-being: 3 Case Reports. The Effect of Levels of Leisure-Time Physical Activity on Cognitive Functions Among Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Longitudinal Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1