Significance of SDC2 and NDRG4 methylation in stool for colorectal cancer diagnosis

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110717
Lu Long , Qian Sun , Fang Yang , Hui Zhou , Yu Wang , Changhe Xiao , Qing He , Bin Yi
{"title":"Significance of SDC2 and NDRG4 methylation in stool for colorectal cancer diagnosis","authors":"Lu Long ,&nbsp;Qian Sun ,&nbsp;Fang Yang ,&nbsp;Hui Zhou ,&nbsp;Yu Wang ,&nbsp;Changhe Xiao ,&nbsp;Qing He ,&nbsp;Bin Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Recent studies have identified methylated SDC2 and NDRG4 in colorectal cancer (CRC), however, the diagnostic value of the combined two genes remains undefined. This study aims to investigate the methylation of SDC2 and NDRG4 in stool samples and their application in diagnosis of CRC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five groups were enrolled in our study which consisted of CRC (n = 138), advanced adenomas (n = 27), polyp (n = 35), intestinal disease control (n = 150), and healthy individuals (n = 28). Methylation status of SDC2 and NDRG4 in fecal samples were tested with appropriate commercial kits. Primary data were collected and statistical analyses were performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The positive rates of both SDC2 and NDRG4 methylation in stool samples of CRC group were significantly higher (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) than those of either group of advanced adenomas, or polyp, or intestinal disease or the healthy control. It was suggested that both methylated SDC2,NDRG4, SDC2/NDRG4 and age were independent risk factors for CRC. The sensitivity of SDC2 and NDRG4 for CRC diagnosis were 73.9 % and 63.0 %, respectively, while SDC2 combined with NDRG4 had a higher sensitivity of 85.5 %. The specificity of SDC2, NDRG4 and SDC2 combined with NDRG4 achieved 91.6 %, 88.3 % and 84.6 %, respectively. The AUC for methylated SDC2 and NDRG4 were 0.828 (95 % CI: 0.780–0.876) and 0.757 (95 % CI: 0.703–0.811), respectively. In contrast, SDC2 combined with NDRG4 improved the AUC to 0.850 (95 % CI: 0.807–0.893).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This research confirmed the significance of detection of SDC2 and NDRG4 methylation by using noninvasive samples of stool. More importantly, attributing to their high level and frequency of methylation in stool, SDC2 and NDRG4 could be promising biomarkers for stool-based method for screening and early diagnosis of CRC, especially when combined.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10172,"journal":{"name":"Clinical biochemistry","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 110717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912024000110/pdfft?md5=1b9724b74e5c96d11eb15593ad193fb8&pid=1-s2.0-S0009912024000110-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912024000110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have identified methylated SDC2 and NDRG4 in colorectal cancer (CRC), however, the diagnostic value of the combined two genes remains undefined. This study aims to investigate the methylation of SDC2 and NDRG4 in stool samples and their application in diagnosis of CRC.

Methods

Five groups were enrolled in our study which consisted of CRC (n = 138), advanced adenomas (n = 27), polyp (n = 35), intestinal disease control (n = 150), and healthy individuals (n = 28). Methylation status of SDC2 and NDRG4 in fecal samples were tested with appropriate commercial kits. Primary data were collected and statistical analyses were performed.

Results

The positive rates of both SDC2 and NDRG4 methylation in stool samples of CRC group were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than those of either group of advanced adenomas, or polyp, or intestinal disease or the healthy control. It was suggested that both methylated SDC2,NDRG4, SDC2/NDRG4 and age were independent risk factors for CRC. The sensitivity of SDC2 and NDRG4 for CRC diagnosis were 73.9 % and 63.0 %, respectively, while SDC2 combined with NDRG4 had a higher sensitivity of 85.5 %. The specificity of SDC2, NDRG4 and SDC2 combined with NDRG4 achieved 91.6 %, 88.3 % and 84.6 %, respectively. The AUC for methylated SDC2 and NDRG4 were 0.828 (95 % CI: 0.780–0.876) and 0.757 (95 % CI: 0.703–0.811), respectively. In contrast, SDC2 combined with NDRG4 improved the AUC to 0.850 (95 % CI: 0.807–0.893).

Conclusions

This research confirmed the significance of detection of SDC2 and NDRG4 methylation by using noninvasive samples of stool. More importantly, attributing to their high level and frequency of methylation in stool, SDC2 and NDRG4 could be promising biomarkers for stool-based method for screening and early diagnosis of CRC, especially when combined.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粪便中 SDC2 和 NDRG4 甲基化对诊断大肠癌的意义
背景最近的研究发现了大肠癌(CRC)中甲基化的 SDC2 和 NDRG4,但这两个基因的诊断价值仍未确定。本研究旨在探讨粪便样本中 SDC2 和 NDRG4 的甲基化及其在 CRC 诊断中的应用。方法本研究共纳入五组样本,包括 CRC(138 人)、晚期腺瘤(27 人)、息肉(35 人)、肠道疾病对照(150 人)和健康人(28 人)。粪便样本中 SDC2 和 NDRG4 的甲基化状态由相应的商业试剂盒进行检测。结果 CRC 组粪便样本中 SDC2 和 NDRG4 甲基化阳性率(P < 0.001)明显高于晚期腺瘤组、息肉组、肠道疾病组或健康对照组。结果表明,甲基化 SDC2、NDRG4、SDC2/NDRG4 和年龄都是 CRC 的独立危险因素。SDC2 和 NDRG4 对 CRC 诊断的敏感性分别为 73.9% 和 63.0%,而 SDC2 与 NDRG4 联合检测的敏感性更高,达到 85.5%。SDC2、NDRG4 和 SDC2 结合 NDRG4 的特异性分别为 91.6%、88.3% 和 84.6%。甲基化 SDC2 和 NDRG4 的 AUC 分别为 0.828(95 % CI:0.780-0.876)和 0.757(95 % CI:0.703-0.811)。结论这项研究证实了使用无创粪便样本检测 SDC2 和 NDRG4 甲基化的重要性。更重要的是,由于 SDC2 和 NDRG4 在粪便中的甲基化水平和频率较高,它们可能成为基于粪便的方法筛查和早期诊断 CRC 的有前途的生物标记物,尤其是在两者结合使用的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical biochemistry
Clinical biochemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Biochemistry publishes articles relating to clinical chemistry, molecular biology and genetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory immunology and laboratory medicine in general, with the focus on analytical and clinical investigation of laboratory tests in humans used for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapy, and monitoring of disease.
期刊最新文献
Accelerated diagnostic pathways for myocardial infarction using a Siemens High-Sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay. The expression of canopy FGF signaling regulator 2 serves as a diagnostic and prognostic indicator for NSCLC Cardiac function impairment in recipient twins of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: Insights from NT-proBNP levels in amniotic fluid Metabolism of Natriuretic peptides and impact on insulin resistance and fat mass in healthy subjects Quantitative abnormalities in the β-region of the electrophoretic profile of serum proteins as predictive markers of monoclonality: Machine learning for monoclonality prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1