Enhancing Student Satisfaction in Educational Management: a Bayesian Analysis of Influential Factors and Improvement Strategies

IF 4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of the Knowledge Economy Pub Date : 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1007/s13132-023-01672-4
Wang Sheng, Zhongyi Fan, Shiyang Weng
{"title":"Enhancing Student Satisfaction in Educational Management: a Bayesian Analysis of Influential Factors and Improvement Strategies","authors":"Wang Sheng, Zhongyi Fan, Shiyang Weng","doi":"10.1007/s13132-023-01672-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since the 1980s, higher education has progressively occupied an expanding portion of social resources, while its contributions to society continue to grow. The quality of higher education and college students’ satisfaction with educational management, along with the factors influencing them, has long been pivotal concerns in the realm of education. Within the academic community, there has been a growing recognition of the importance of assessing higher education management through the lens of student satisfaction. However, in today’s educational landscape, students hold diverse opinions regarding teaching quality within colleges. To address this situation, this paper employs Bayesian statistical methods to investigate and analyze the determinants of college students’ satisfaction with educational management. The study further utilizes factor analysis, regression analysis, and evaluation scoring methods to discern the influencing factors behind educational management satisfaction. The findings reveal that 36.60% of students possess a general understanding of the subject, while 14% have no understanding at all, thereby impacting their comprehension of teaching management. Additionally, insufficient attention to teaching management information affects students’ cognizance of this domain, with 62% of students occasionally paying attention and 35% never doing so. These current circumstances inevitably affect students’ evaluations of teaching management satisfaction. Consequently, higher education institutions must establish more direct lines of communication with students and employ methods that students are willing to engage with, utilizing multi-channel and multi-level approaches to elevate students’ cognitive grasp of teaching management.</p>","PeriodicalId":47435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01672-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the 1980s, higher education has progressively occupied an expanding portion of social resources, while its contributions to society continue to grow. The quality of higher education and college students’ satisfaction with educational management, along with the factors influencing them, has long been pivotal concerns in the realm of education. Within the academic community, there has been a growing recognition of the importance of assessing higher education management through the lens of student satisfaction. However, in today’s educational landscape, students hold diverse opinions regarding teaching quality within colleges. To address this situation, this paper employs Bayesian statistical methods to investigate and analyze the determinants of college students’ satisfaction with educational management. The study further utilizes factor analysis, regression analysis, and evaluation scoring methods to discern the influencing factors behind educational management satisfaction. The findings reveal that 36.60% of students possess a general understanding of the subject, while 14% have no understanding at all, thereby impacting their comprehension of teaching management. Additionally, insufficient attention to teaching management information affects students’ cognizance of this domain, with 62% of students occasionally paying attention and 35% never doing so. These current circumstances inevitably affect students’ evaluations of teaching management satisfaction. Consequently, higher education institutions must establish more direct lines of communication with students and employ methods that students are willing to engage with, utilizing multi-channel and multi-level approaches to elevate students’ cognitive grasp of teaching management.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高学生对教育管理的满意度:对影响因素和改进策略的贝叶斯分析
自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,高等教育在社会资源中所占的比重不断扩大,对社会的贡献也持续增长。长期以来,高等教育质量和大学生对教育管理的满意度及其影响因素一直是教育界关注的焦点。在学术界,越来越多的人认识到从学生满意度的角度来评估高等教育管理的重要性。然而,在当今的教育环境中,学生对高校的教学质量持有不同意见。针对这种情况,本文采用贝叶斯统计方法对大学生对教学管理满意度的决定因素进行了调查和分析。研究进一步运用因素分析法、回归分析法和评价打分法,对教学管理满意度背后的影响因素进行辨析。研究结果显示,36.60% 的学生对该学科有一般了解,14% 的学生完全不了解,从而影响了他们对教学管理的理解。此外,对教学管理信息关注不够也影响了学生对这一领域的认知,62%的学生偶尔关注,35%的学生从不关注。这些现状必然影响学生对教学管理满意度的评价。因此,高校必须与学生建立更直接的沟通渠道,采用学生乐于参与的方式,利用多渠道、多层次的方法提升学生对教学管理的认知把握。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
27.30%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: In the context of rapid globalization and technological capacity, the world’s economies today are driven increasingly by knowledge—the expertise, skills, experience, education, understanding, awareness, perception, and other qualities required to communicate, interpret, and analyze information. New wealth is created by the application of knowledge to improve productivity—and to create new products, services, systems, and process (i.e., to innovate). The Journal of the Knowledge Economy focuses on the dynamics of the knowledge-based economy, with an emphasis on the role of knowledge creation, diffusion, and application across three economic levels: (1) the systemic ''meta'' or ''macro''-level, (2) the organizational ''meso''-level, and (3) the individual ''micro''-level. The journal incorporates insights from the fields of economics, management, law, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and political science to shed new light on the evolving role of knowledge, with a particular emphasis on how innovation can be leveraged to provide solutions to complex problems and issues, including global crises in environmental sustainability, education, and economic development. Articles emphasize empirical studies, underscoring a comparative approach, and, to a lesser extent, case studies and theoretical articles. The journal balances practice/application and theory/concepts.
期刊最新文献
An Engagement Between Faculty Adeptness, Learner’s Expectations, Usage of Technology, and Perceived Learner’s Learning Outcome: Mediating Role of Emotional Intelligence Impact of Mobile Money on Resilience to Health Shocks in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Togo The Fishing and Aquaculture Production of Latin America with Respect to the Trade Balance and Foreign Investment Effects of ICTs on Labor Productivity: A Re-examination of Solow’s Paradox Through the Prism of the Joint Use of ICT Tools in Cameroonian Firms Career Imprints from Diverse Institutional Settings: a Comparative Study of Academic and Non-academic Partnered Ventures in Technopolis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1