The impact of non-native English speakers’ phonological and prosodic features on automatic speech recognition accuracy

IF 2.4 3区 计算机科学 Q2 ACOUSTICS Speech Communication Pub Date : 2024-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.specom.2024.103038
Ingy Farouk Emara , Nabil Hamdy Shaker
{"title":"The impact of non-native English speakers’ phonological and prosodic features on automatic speech recognition accuracy","authors":"Ingy Farouk Emara ,&nbsp;Nabil Hamdy Shaker","doi":"10.1016/j.specom.2024.103038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study examines the impact of Arab speakers’ phonological and prosodic features on the accuracy of automatic speech recognition (ASR) of non-native English speech. The authors first investigated the perceptions of 30 Egyptian ESL teachers and 70 Egyptian university students towards the L1 (Arabic)-based errors affecting intelligibility and then carried out a data analysis of the ASR of the students’ English speech to find out whether the errors investigated resulted in intelligibility breakdowns in an ASR setting. In terms of the phonological features of non-native speech, the results showed that the teachers gave more weight to pronunciation features of accented speech that did not actually hinder recognition, that the students were mostly oblivious to the L2 errors they made and their impact on intelligibility, and that L2 errors which were not perceived as serious by both teachers and students had negative impacts on ASR accuracy levels. In regard to the prosodic features of non-native speech, it was found that lower speech rates resulted in more accurate speech recognition levels, higher speech intensity led to less deletion errors, and voice pitch did not seem to have any impact on ASR accuracy levels. The study, accordingly, recommends training ASR systems with more non-native data to increase their accuracy levels as well as paying more attention to remedying non-native speakers’ L1-based errors that are more likely to impact non-native automatic speech recognition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49485,"journal":{"name":"Speech Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Communication","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167639324000104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study examines the impact of Arab speakers’ phonological and prosodic features on the accuracy of automatic speech recognition (ASR) of non-native English speech. The authors first investigated the perceptions of 30 Egyptian ESL teachers and 70 Egyptian university students towards the L1 (Arabic)-based errors affecting intelligibility and then carried out a data analysis of the ASR of the students’ English speech to find out whether the errors investigated resulted in intelligibility breakdowns in an ASR setting. In terms of the phonological features of non-native speech, the results showed that the teachers gave more weight to pronunciation features of accented speech that did not actually hinder recognition, that the students were mostly oblivious to the L2 errors they made and their impact on intelligibility, and that L2 errors which were not perceived as serious by both teachers and students had negative impacts on ASR accuracy levels. In regard to the prosodic features of non-native speech, it was found that lower speech rates resulted in more accurate speech recognition levels, higher speech intensity led to less deletion errors, and voice pitch did not seem to have any impact on ASR accuracy levels. The study, accordingly, recommends training ASR systems with more non-native data to increase their accuracy levels as well as paying more attention to remedying non-native speakers’ L1-based errors that are more likely to impact non-native automatic speech recognition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非英语母语者的语音和拟声特征对自动语音识别准确率的影响
本研究探讨了阿拉伯语者的语音和前音特征对非母语英语语音自动语音识别(ASR)准确性的影响。作者首先调查了 30 名埃及 ESL 教师和 70 名埃及大学生对影响可懂度的基于 L1(阿拉伯语)的错误的看法,然后对学生的英语语音自动识别进行了数据分析,以了解所调查的错误是否会在自动语音识别环境中导致可懂度下降。在非母语语音的语音特征方面,研究结果表明,教师更重视实际上并不妨碍识别的重音语音的发音特征;学生大多忽视他们所犯的 L2 错误及其对可懂度的影响;教师和学生都认为不严重的 L2 错误对 ASR 准确度水平有负面影响。关于非母语语音的前音特征,研究发现,较低的语速会导致更高的语音识别准确率,较高的语音强度会导致较少的删除错误,而声调似乎对 ASR 的准确率水平没有任何影响。因此,该研究建议使用更多的非母语数据对自动语音识别系统进行培训,以提高其准确度,同时更加关注纠正非母语人士基于 L1 的错误,因为这些错误更有可能影响非母语自动语音识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Speech Communication
Speech Communication 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Speech Communication is an interdisciplinary journal whose primary objective is to fulfil the need for the rapid dissemination and thorough discussion of basic and applied research results. The journal''s primary objectives are: • to present a forum for the advancement of human and human-machine speech communication science; • to stimulate cross-fertilization between different fields of this domain; • to contribute towards the rapid and wide diffusion of scientifically sound contributions in this domain.
期刊最新文献
A corpus of audio-visual recordings of linguistically balanced, Danish sentences for speech-in-noise experiments Forms, factors and functions of phonetic convergence: Editorial Feasibility of acoustic features of vowel sounds in estimating the upper airway cross sectional area during wakefulness: A pilot study Zero-shot voice conversion based on feature disentanglement Multi-modal co-learning for silent speech recognition based on ultrasound tongue images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1