Naturalistic evaluation of HeadGear: A smartphone app to reduce depressive symptoms in workers

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Behavior Therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2024.01.001
Mark Deady, Daniel A. J. Collins, Nicholas Glozier, Evangeline Gardiner, Andrew Arena, Aimee Gayed, Richard Bryant, Rafael A. Calvo, Samuel B. Harvey
{"title":"Naturalistic evaluation of HeadGear: A smartphone app to reduce depressive symptoms in workers","authors":"Mark Deady, Daniel A. J. Collins, Nicholas Glozier, Evangeline Gardiner, Andrew Arena, Aimee Gayed, Richard Bryant, Rafael A. Calvo, Samuel B. Harvey","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mobile health (mHealth) apps have the potential to expand access to evidence-based interventions for mental health conditions, including depression. <em>HeadGear</em> was developed to prevent depression and improve wellbeing among the working population and was associated with significant positive effects in an efficacy trial. This study presents the results from a naturalistic trial intended to evaluate real-world usage of the app. We examined the naturalistic use of <em>HeadGear</em> between March 2019 and March 2022, using app analytic data, in-app event data, and surveys assessing depressive symptoms, wellbeing, and work performance repeated at 30-day intervals over 5-month app usage. During the observation period, <em>HeadGear</em> was widely disseminated to the public, and downloaded 26,455 times. Of those who downloaded the app, 12,995 completed baseline. The mean age of users was 38.23 (<em>SD</em> = 12.39) and 60% were women. Approximately one in four met criteria for probable depression at baseline. Depressive symptoms showed consistent improvement at all timepoints (Cohen’s <em>d</em> ranging from 0.24 at 1 month to 0.13 at 5 months). A similar pattern emerged for wellbeing. Work performance showed improvement to 2-month follow-up only. The strongest change was found for those with greater symptom severity at baseline, and those with high app engagement. Attrition at follow-up points was high. Findings regarding the real-world use of <em>HeadGear</em> are promising and highlight the use of such apps among those with higher symptom severity (despite the intended use of the app as a prevention tool). Further work is required to tailor mHealth apps to reach their full potential through an enhanced understanding of the utility of individual features for effectiveness and engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2024.01.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) apps have the potential to expand access to evidence-based interventions for mental health conditions, including depression. HeadGear was developed to prevent depression and improve wellbeing among the working population and was associated with significant positive effects in an efficacy trial. This study presents the results from a naturalistic trial intended to evaluate real-world usage of the app. We examined the naturalistic use of HeadGear between March 2019 and March 2022, using app analytic data, in-app event data, and surveys assessing depressive symptoms, wellbeing, and work performance repeated at 30-day intervals over 5-month app usage. During the observation period, HeadGear was widely disseminated to the public, and downloaded 26,455 times. Of those who downloaded the app, 12,995 completed baseline. The mean age of users was 38.23 (SD = 12.39) and 60% were women. Approximately one in four met criteria for probable depression at baseline. Depressive symptoms showed consistent improvement at all timepoints (Cohen’s d ranging from 0.24 at 1 month to 0.13 at 5 months). A similar pattern emerged for wellbeing. Work performance showed improvement to 2-month follow-up only. The strongest change was found for those with greater symptom severity at baseline, and those with high app engagement. Attrition at follow-up points was high. Findings regarding the real-world use of HeadGear are promising and highlight the use of such apps among those with higher symptom severity (despite the intended use of the app as a prevention tool). Further work is required to tailor mHealth apps to reach their full potential through an enhanced understanding of the utility of individual features for effectiveness and engagement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HeadGear 的自然评估:减少工人抑郁症状的智能手机应用程序
移动医疗(mHealth)应用程序有可能扩大对包括抑郁症在内的精神健康状况的循证干预。HeadGear 的开发旨在预防抑郁症并改善工作人群的健康状况,在一项疗效试验中取得了显著的积极效果。本研究介绍了一项自然试验的结果,旨在评估该应用在现实世界中的使用情况。我们使用应用分析数据、应用内事件数据以及在5个月的应用使用期间每隔30天重复进行的抑郁症状、幸福感和工作表现评估调查,对2019年3月至2022年3月期间HeadGear的自然使用情况进行了研究。在观察期间,HeadGear 向公众广泛传播,下载次数达 26,455 次。在下载应用程序的用户中,有 12,995 人完成了基线测试。用户的平均年龄为 38.23 岁(SD = 12.39),60% 为女性。大约四分之一的人在基线时符合可能患有抑郁症的标准。抑郁症状在所有时间点均有持续改善(Cohen's d 从 1 个月时的 0.24 到 5 个月时的 0.13 不等)。在幸福感方面也出现了类似的情况。工作表现仅在 2 个月的随访中有所改善。基线症状严重程度较高的人群和应用参与度高的人群的变化最大。随访点的流失率很高。有关 HeadGear 实际使用情况的研究结果很有前景,并强调了症状严重程度较高的人群使用此类应用程序的情况(尽管该应用程序旨在用作预防工具)。还需要进一步开展工作,通过加强对单个功能在有效性和参与度方面的作用的了解,定制移动医疗应用程序以充分发挥其潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Underlying Working Mechanisms of Virtual Reality Exposure: Exploring the Role of Fearful Expectancies and Habituation Impact of a Brief Parenting Intervention on Parent and Infant Imitation Evaluating the Effectiveness of Safety Plans for Mitigating Suicide Risk in Two Samples of Psychiatrically Hospitalized Military Veterans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1