Industry Practices for Challenging Autonomous Driving Systems with Critical Scenarios

IF 6.6 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology Pub Date : 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1145/3640334
Qunying Song, Emelie Engström, Per Runeson
{"title":"Industry Practices for Challenging Autonomous Driving Systems with Critical Scenarios","authors":"Qunying Song, Emelie Engström, Per Runeson","doi":"10.1145/3640334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Testing autonomous driving systems for safety and reliability is essential, yet complex. A primary challenge is identifying relevant test scenarios, especially the critical ones that may expose hazards or harm to autonomous vehicles and other road users. Although numerous approaches and tools for critical scenario identification are proposed, the industry practices for selection, implementation, and limitations of approaches, are not well understood. Therefore, we aim to explore practical aspects of how autonomous driving systems are tested, particularly the identification and use of critical scenarios. We interviewed 13 practitioners from 7 companies in autonomous driving in Sweden. We used thematic modeling to analyse and synthesize the interview data. As a result, we present 9 themes of practices and 4 themes of challenges related to critical scenarios. Our analysis indicates there is little joint effort in the industry, despite every approach has its own limitations, and tools and platforms are lacking. To that end, we recommend the industry and academia combine different approaches, collaborate among different stakeholders, and continuously learn the field. The contributions of our study are exploration and synthesis of industry practices and related challenges for critical scenario identification and testing, and potential increase of industry relevance for future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50933,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3640334","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Testing autonomous driving systems for safety and reliability is essential, yet complex. A primary challenge is identifying relevant test scenarios, especially the critical ones that may expose hazards or harm to autonomous vehicles and other road users. Although numerous approaches and tools for critical scenario identification are proposed, the industry practices for selection, implementation, and limitations of approaches, are not well understood. Therefore, we aim to explore practical aspects of how autonomous driving systems are tested, particularly the identification and use of critical scenarios. We interviewed 13 practitioners from 7 companies in autonomous driving in Sweden. We used thematic modeling to analyse and synthesize the interview data. As a result, we present 9 themes of practices and 4 themes of challenges related to critical scenarios. Our analysis indicates there is little joint effort in the industry, despite every approach has its own limitations, and tools and platforms are lacking. To that end, we recommend the industry and academia combine different approaches, collaborate among different stakeholders, and continuously learn the field. The contributions of our study are exploration and synthesis of industry practices and related challenges for critical scenario identification and testing, and potential increase of industry relevance for future studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用关键场景挑战自动驾驶系统的行业实践
测试自动驾驶系统的安全性和可靠性至关重要,但也十分复杂。一个主要的挑战是识别相关的测试场景,尤其是可能对自动驾驶车辆和其他道路使用者造成危险或伤害的关键场景。虽然已经提出了许多用于识别关键场景的方法和工具,但业界对这些方法的选择、实施和局限性并不十分了解。因此,我们旨在探索自动驾驶系统测试的实践方面,特别是关键场景的识别和使用。我们采访了来自瑞典 7 家自动驾驶公司的 13 名从业人员。我们采用主题建模法对访谈数据进行分析和综合。因此,我们提出了与关键情景相关的 9 个实践主题和 4 个挑战主题。我们的分析表明,尽管每种方法都有其自身的局限性,但行业内几乎没有共同努力,也缺乏工具和平台。为此,我们建议业界和学术界结合不同的方法,在不同利益相关者之间开展合作,并不断学习该领域的知识。我们这项研究的贡献在于探索和总结了行业实践以及关键情景识别和测试的相关挑战,并为未来研究提供了潜在的行业相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
164
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Designing and building a large, complex software system is a tremendous challenge. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) publishes papers on all aspects of that challenge: specification, design, development and maintenance. It covers tools and methodologies, languages, data structures, and algorithms. TOSEM also reports on successful efforts, noting practical lessons that can be scaled and transferred to other projects, and often looks at applications of innovative technologies. The tone is scholarly but readable; the content is worthy of study; the presentation is effective.
期刊最新文献
Effective, Platform-Independent GUI Testing via Image Embedding and Reinforcement Learning Bitmap-Based Security Monitoring for Deeply Embedded Systems Harmonising Contributions: Exploring Diversity in Software Engineering through CQA Mining on Stack Overflow An Empirical Study on the Characteristics of Database Access Bugs in Java Applications Self-planning Code Generation with Large Language Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1