Implementing point-of-care hemoglobin A1C testing in an obstetrics outpatient clinic.

Homayemem Weli, Christopher W Farnsworth
{"title":"Implementing point-of-care hemoglobin A1C testing in an obstetrics outpatient clinic.","authors":"Homayemem Weli, Christopher W Farnsworth","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A1C ≥6.0% is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes in pregnant diabetic patients. A1C testing is recommended by the American Diabetes Association as a secondary measure of glycemic control in pregnant patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the utility of A1C point-of-care testing (POCT) during pregnancy to facilitate rapid counseling and diabetes care, particularly in relatively low-income transient patient populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients presenting to an outpatient obstetrics office with routine, in-laboratory A1C testing, before and after the implementation of POCT for A1C (n = 70 and n = 75, respectively). Demographics, results, physician referral to a nutritionist, counseling, and outcomes were retrieved from patient electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 9% and 23% of the in-laboratory and POCT groups, respectively, were referred for nutrition services (P = .02). Of these, 22% of the in-laboratory group and 42% of the POCT group received immediate counseling (P < .01). An inverse correlation was observed between A1C level at study entry and gestational weeks at delivery, with a Pearson r value of -0.39 (-0.58 to -0.16) for the in-laboratory group and -0.38 (-0.57 to -0.14) for the POCT group. No statistically significant difference in pregnancy outcomes was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of A1C POCT was associated with immediate counseling and management of the health of pregnant patients, but was not associated with improved outcomes, in a low-resource patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"464-470"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmad112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A1C ≥6.0% is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes in pregnant diabetic patients. A1C testing is recommended by the American Diabetes Association as a secondary measure of glycemic control in pregnant patients.

Objective: To determine the utility of A1C point-of-care testing (POCT) during pregnancy to facilitate rapid counseling and diabetes care, particularly in relatively low-income transient patient populations.

Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients presenting to an outpatient obstetrics office with routine, in-laboratory A1C testing, before and after the implementation of POCT for A1C (n = 70 and n = 75, respectively). Demographics, results, physician referral to a nutritionist, counseling, and outcomes were retrieved from patient electronic medical records.

Results: In total, 9% and 23% of the in-laboratory and POCT groups, respectively, were referred for nutrition services (P = .02). Of these, 22% of the in-laboratory group and 42% of the POCT group received immediate counseling (P < .01). An inverse correlation was observed between A1C level at study entry and gestational weeks at delivery, with a Pearson r value of -0.39 (-0.58 to -0.16) for the in-laboratory group and -0.38 (-0.57 to -0.14) for the POCT group. No statistically significant difference in pregnancy outcomes was observed.

Conclusion: Implementation of A1C POCT was associated with immediate counseling and management of the health of pregnant patients, but was not associated with improved outcomes, in a low-resource patient population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在产科门诊实施护理点血红蛋白 A1C 检测。
背景:A1C≥6.0% 与妊娠糖尿病患者不良预后风险增加有关。美国糖尿病协会建议将 A1C 检测作为孕期患者血糖控制的辅助措施:确定孕期 A1C 护理点检测(POCT)在促进快速咨询和糖尿病护理方面的效用,尤其是在相对低收入的流动患者群体中:我们对在产科门诊进行常规实验室 A1C 检测的患者进行了一次单中心回顾性分析,分析时间为实施 A1C POCT 之前和之后(分别为 70 人和 75 人)。从患者电子病历中检索了人口统计学、结果、医生转介营养师、咨询和结果:在实验室组和 POCT 组中,分别有 9% 和 23% 的患者转诊接受营养服务(P = .02)。其中,22%的实验室组和 42% 的 POCT 组患者立即接受了营养咨询(P < .01)。研究开始时的 A1C 水平与分娩时的孕周呈反相关,实验室组的 Pearson r 值为 -0.39 (-0.58 to -0.16),POCT 组为 -0.38 (-0.57 to -0.14)。妊娠结局无统计学差异:结论:在资源匮乏的患者群体中,A1C POCT 的实施与即时咨询和孕妇健康管理有关,但与妊娠结局的改善无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of basic lymphocyte phenotype results between a diagnostic and a research laboratory. Evidence-based approach for the generation of a multivariate logistic regression model that predicts instrument failure. Correlation of the abundance of MDSCs, Tregs, PD-1, and PD-L1 with the efficacy of chemotherapy and prognosis in gastric cancer. Correction to: The utility of an algorithm based on procalcitonin monitoring in patients with sepsis. Implementing laboratory internal audit to improve compliance and quality of care in the municipal public health system-based ambulatory care health clinics in New York city.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1