Glasgow Coma Scale Motor Score Predicts Need for Tracheostomy After Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury.

Q3 Medicine Korean Journal of Neurotrauma Pub Date : 2023-11-06 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e53
Andrew R Guillotte, Lane Fry, Domenico Gattozzi, Kushal Shah
{"title":"Glasgow Coma Scale Motor Score Predicts Need for Tracheostomy After Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Andrew R Guillotte, Lane Fry, Domenico Gattozzi, Kushal Shah","doi":"10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Many patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) require a tracheostomy after decompressive craniectomy. Determining which patients will require tracheostomy is often challenging. The existing methods for predicting which patients will require tracheostomy are more applicable to stroke and spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) motor score can be used as a screening method for predicting which patients who undergo decompressive craniectomy for severe TBI are likely to require tracheostomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The neurosurgery census at the University of Kansas Medical Center was retrospectively reviewed to identify adult patients aged over 18 years who underwent decompressive craniectomy for TBI. Eighty patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. There were no exclusion criteria. The primary outcome of interest was the need for tracheostomy. The secondary outcome was the comparison of the total length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit LOS between the early and late tracheostomy patient groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients (100%) with a GCS motor score of 4 or less on post operative (POD) 5 required tracheostomy. Setting the threshold at GCS motor score of 5 on POD 5 for recommending tracheostomy resulted in 86.7% sensitivity, 91.7% specificity, and 90.5% positive predictive value, with an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.9101.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GCS motor score of 5 or less on POD 5 of decompressive craniectomy is a useful screening threshold for selecting patients who may benefit from tracheostomy, or may be potential candidates for extubation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36879,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","volume":"19 4","pages":"454-465"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10782100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Many patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) require a tracheostomy after decompressive craniectomy. Determining which patients will require tracheostomy is often challenging. The existing methods for predicting which patients will require tracheostomy are more applicable to stroke and spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) motor score can be used as a screening method for predicting which patients who undergo decompressive craniectomy for severe TBI are likely to require tracheostomy.

Methods: The neurosurgery census at the University of Kansas Medical Center was retrospectively reviewed to identify adult patients aged over 18 years who underwent decompressive craniectomy for TBI. Eighty patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. There were no exclusion criteria. The primary outcome of interest was the need for tracheostomy. The secondary outcome was the comparison of the total length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit LOS between the early and late tracheostomy patient groups.

Results: All patients (100%) with a GCS motor score of 4 or less on post operative (POD) 5 required tracheostomy. Setting the threshold at GCS motor score of 5 on POD 5 for recommending tracheostomy resulted in 86.7% sensitivity, 91.7% specificity, and 90.5% positive predictive value, with an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.9101.

Conclusion: GCS motor score of 5 or less on POD 5 of decompressive craniectomy is a useful screening threshold for selecting patients who may benefit from tracheostomy, or may be potential candidates for extubation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
格拉斯哥昏迷量表运动评分预测创伤性脑损伤减压颅骨切除术后气管造口术的必要性。
目的:许多严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者在颅骨减压切除术后需要进行气管造口术。确定哪些患者需要进行气管切开术往往具有挑战性。现有的预测哪些患者需要气管切开术的方法更适用于中风和自发性颅内出血。本研究旨在探讨格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)运动评分是否可作为一种筛选方法,用于预测因严重创伤性脑损伤而接受减压开颅手术的患者哪些可能需要进行气管切开术:对堪萨斯大学医学中心的神经外科普查进行了回顾性审查,以确定因创伤性脑损伤而接受减压开颅手术的 18 岁以上成年患者。80名患者符合研究的纳入标准。没有排除标准。研究的主要结果是是否需要进行气管造口术。次要结果是比较早期和晚期气管切开术患者组的总住院时间(LOS)和重症监护室住院时间:所有在术后(POD)5 天 GCS 运动评分为 4 分或以下的患者(100%)都需要进行气管切开术。将 POD 5 的 GCS 运动评分设定为建议进行气管切开术的阈值,结果灵敏度为 86.7%,特异度为 91.7%,阳性预测值为 90.5%,接收者运算曲线下面积为 0.9101:颅骨减压术后第 5 个手术日的 GCS 运动评分为 5 分或低于 5 分,是筛选气管切开术受益患者或潜在拔管患者的有效筛选标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor: Commentary on Acute Paraparesis Caused by Spinal Epidural Fluid After Balloon Kyphoplasty for Traumatic Avascular Necrosis: A Case Report (Korean J Neurotrauma 2023;19:398-402). Should Hypertonic Saline Be Considered for the Treatment of Intracranial Hypertension? A Review of Current Evidence and Clinical Practices. Pain Intervention for Osteoporotic Compression Fracture, From Physical Therapy to Surgery: A Literature Review. KJNT Symposium 2024: A Starting Point for a Leap Forward. Feasibility Study of Parkinson's Speech Disorder Evaluation With Pre-Trained Deep Learning Model for Speech-to-Text Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1