Let's Learn Together! A Mixed-Methods Study to Assess Readiness for Interprofessional Education on Total Worker Health® Practice.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Workplace Health & Safety Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-13 DOI:10.1177/21650799231217320
Suzanne Nobrega, Yuan Zhang
{"title":"Let's Learn Together! A Mixed-Methods Study to Assess Readiness for Interprofessional Education on <i>Total Worker Health</i><sup>®</sup> Practice.","authors":"Suzanne Nobrega, Yuan Zhang","doi":"10.1177/21650799231217320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occupational safety and health (OSH) professionals increasingly need interdisciplinary collaborative practice competencies to respond to complex worker safety, health, and well-being risks. Effective collaboration with non-OSH-trained professionals (e.g., health promotion, human resources) is critical for planning integrated interventions that address work and non-work risks, consistent with a \"<i>Total Worker Health</i>\" (TWH) approach. Interprofessional education (IPE) pedagogy offers skill-building for interdisciplinary collaboration, but little attention has been given to IPE in OSH education and training literature. The goal of this study was to assess OSH professionals' perceptions about IPE to guide application in postgraduate TWH education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The mixed-methods study involved 210 U.S. professionals in safety (31%), industrial hygiene (16%), occupational nursing (12%) and medicine (11%), and related disciplines (30%). Participants completed a 12-item Readiness for Interprofessional Education Scale (RIPLS) adapted for TWH. Nineteen survey-takers also participated in virtual focus groups to share opinions about IPE benefits, barriers, and desirable course features.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Occupational safety and health professionals reported high overall readiness for IPE (RIPLS, 4.45 ± 0.47), endorsing IPE for interdisciplinary skill-building. Salient IPE motivators were learning new perspectives from diverse disciplines and industries; gaining new subject expertise; developing common ground across disciplines; and learning TWH best practices. Participants recommended case studies to practice interdisciplinary problem-solving through group work.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/application to practice: </strong>Interprofessional education is a promising pedagogy for OSH continuing education to promote interdisciplinary collaboration skills needed for TWH practice in the workplace. Occupational safety and health educators need to build competency in IPE pedagogical theory and practice to ensure effective training design and evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48968,"journal":{"name":"Workplace Health & Safety","volume":" ","pages":"223-233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11132934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workplace Health & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799231217320","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Occupational safety and health (OSH) professionals increasingly need interdisciplinary collaborative practice competencies to respond to complex worker safety, health, and well-being risks. Effective collaboration with non-OSH-trained professionals (e.g., health promotion, human resources) is critical for planning integrated interventions that address work and non-work risks, consistent with a "Total Worker Health" (TWH) approach. Interprofessional education (IPE) pedagogy offers skill-building for interdisciplinary collaboration, but little attention has been given to IPE in OSH education and training literature. The goal of this study was to assess OSH professionals' perceptions about IPE to guide application in postgraduate TWH education.

Methods: The mixed-methods study involved 210 U.S. professionals in safety (31%), industrial hygiene (16%), occupational nursing (12%) and medicine (11%), and related disciplines (30%). Participants completed a 12-item Readiness for Interprofessional Education Scale (RIPLS) adapted for TWH. Nineteen survey-takers also participated in virtual focus groups to share opinions about IPE benefits, barriers, and desirable course features.

Findings: Occupational safety and health professionals reported high overall readiness for IPE (RIPLS, 4.45 ± 0.47), endorsing IPE for interdisciplinary skill-building. Salient IPE motivators were learning new perspectives from diverse disciplines and industries; gaining new subject expertise; developing common ground across disciplines; and learning TWH best practices. Participants recommended case studies to practice interdisciplinary problem-solving through group work.

Conclusions/application to practice: Interprofessional education is a promising pedagogy for OSH continuing education to promote interdisciplinary collaboration skills needed for TWH practice in the workplace. Occupational safety and health educators need to build competency in IPE pedagogical theory and practice to ensure effective training design and evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让我们一起学习!一项混合方法研究,评估跨专业教育在全员健康®实践方面的准备情况。
背景:职业安全与健康(OSH)专业人员越来越需要跨学科合作实践能力,以应对复杂的工人安全、健康和福利风险。与接受过职业安全与健康培训的非专业人员(如健康促进、人力资源)有效合作,对于规划综合干预措施以应对工作和非工作风险至关重要,这与 "全面工人健康"(TWH)方法是一致的。跨专业教育(IPE)教学法为跨学科合作提供了技能培养,但职业安全与健康教育和培训文献很少关注跨专业教育。本研究旨在评估职业安全与健康专业人员对 IPE 的看法,以指导 TWH 研究生教育的应用:这项混合方法研究涉及 210 名美国安全(31%)、工业卫生(16%)、职业护理(12%)和医学(11%)以及相关学科(30%)的专业人员。参与者完成了为 TWH 改编的 12 个项目的跨专业教育准备度量表(RIPLS)。19 名调查者还参加了虚拟焦点小组,就跨专业教育的益处、障碍和理想的课程特点交流了看法:职业安全与健康专业人员对 IPE 的总体准备程度较高(RIPLS,4.45 ± 0.47),赞同 IPE 用于跨学科技能培养。突出的 IPE 动机是学习来自不同学科和行业的新观点;获得新的学科专业知识;发展跨学科的共同点;以及学习 TWH 最佳实践。学员们建议开展案例研究,通过小组工作练习跨学科解决问题:跨专业教育是职业安全与健康继续教育的一种很有前途的教学方法,可以促进工作场所 TWH 实践所需的跨学科合作技能。职业安全与健康教育工作者需要在跨专业教育的教学理论和实践方面建立能力,以确保有效的培训设计和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Workplace Health & Safety: Promoting Environments Conducive to Well-Being and Productivity is the official publication of the American Association of Occupational Health Nursing, Inc. (AAOHN). It is a scientific peer-reviewed Journal. Its purpose is to support and promote the practice of occupational and environmental health nurses by providing leading edge research findings and evidence-based clinical practices. It publishes articles that span the range of issues facing occupational and environmental health professionals, including emergency and all-hazard preparedness, health promotion, safety, productivity, environmental health, case management, workers'' compensation, business and leadership, compliance and information management.
期刊最新文献
Reliability of Wearable Technology to Monitor Core Temperature Among Helicopter-Based EMS Crews. Wipe Disinfection of Reusable Elastomeric Half-Mask Respirators for Health Care Use. Digital Coaching to Address Health, Wellness, and Burnout Among Healthcare Workers: Pilot Study Results. Lower Back Injury in Factory Workers. The Impact of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms on Depressive Symptoms and Health-Promoting Behaviors Among Korean Coast Guards: The Mediating Role of Social Support.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1