How Are Leading Research Institutions Engaging with Data Sharing Tools and Programs?

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium Pub Date : 2024-01-11 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01
Eric S Hall, Genevieve B Melton, Philip R O Payne, David A Dorr, David K Vawdrey
{"title":"How Are Leading Research Institutions Engaging with Data Sharing Tools and Programs?","authors":"Eric S Hall, Genevieve B Melton, Philip R O Payne, David A Dorr, David K Vawdrey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With widespread electronic health record (EHR) adoption and improvements in health information interoperability in the United States, troves of data are available for knowledge discovery. Several data sharing programs and tools have been developed to support research activities, including efforts funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), EHR vendors, and other public- and private-sector entities. We surveyed 65 leading research institutions (77% response rate) about their use of and value derived from ten programs/tools, including NIH's Accrual to Clinical Trials, Epic Corporation's Cosmos, and the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics consortium. Most institutions participated in multiple programs/tools but reported relatively low usage (even when they participated, they frequently indicated that fewer than one individual/month benefitted from the platform to support research activities). Our findings suggest that investments in research data sharing have not yet achieved desired results.</p>","PeriodicalId":72180,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":"2023 ","pages":"397-406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10785902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With widespread electronic health record (EHR) adoption and improvements in health information interoperability in the United States, troves of data are available for knowledge discovery. Several data sharing programs and tools have been developed to support research activities, including efforts funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), EHR vendors, and other public- and private-sector entities. We surveyed 65 leading research institutions (77% response rate) about their use of and value derived from ten programs/tools, including NIH's Accrual to Clinical Trials, Epic Corporation's Cosmos, and the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics consortium. Most institutions participated in multiple programs/tools but reported relatively low usage (even when they participated, they frequently indicated that fewer than one individual/month benefitted from the platform to support research activities). Our findings suggest that investments in research data sharing have not yet achieved desired results.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
领先研究机构如何使用数据共享工具和计划?
随着电子病历(EHR)在美国的广泛应用和医疗信息互操作性的提高,大量数据可供知识发现之用。为了支持研究活动,包括由美国国立卫生研究院 (NIH)、电子病历供应商以及其他公共和私营部门实体资助的活动在内,已经开发了多个数据共享计划和工具。我们对 65 家主要研究机构(回复率为 77%)进行了调查,了解他们对十项计划/工具的使用情况和从中获得的价值,这些计划/工具包括美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的 Accrual to Clinical Trials、Epic Corporation 的 Cosmos 以及 Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics consortium。大多数机构参与了多个项目/工具,但报告的使用率相对较低(即使参与了项目/工具,他们也经常表示每月只有不到一个人受益于该平台以支持研究活动)。我们的研究结果表明,对研究数据共享的投资尚未达到预期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethicara for Responsible AI in Healthcare: A System for Bias Detection and AI Risk Management. Towards Fair Patient-Trial Matching via Patient-Criterion Level Fairness Constraint. Towards Understanding the Generalization of Medical Text-to-SQL Models and Datasets. Transferable and Interpretable Treatment Effectiveness Prediction for Ovarian Cancer via Multimodal Deep Learning. Understanding Cancer Caregiving and Predicting Burden: An Analytics and Machine Learning Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1