Identifying Reuse and Redundancies in Respiratory Flowsheet Documentation: Implications for Clinician Documentation Burden.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium Pub Date : 2024-01-11 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01
Jennifer Withall, Mai Tran, Bobby Schroeder, Rachel Lee, Amanda Moy, Syed Mohtashim Abbas Bokhari, Kenrick Cato, Sarah Rossetti
{"title":"Identifying Reuse and Redundancies in Respiratory Flowsheet Documentation: Implications for Clinician Documentation Burden.","authors":"Jennifer Withall, Mai Tran, Bobby Schroeder, Rachel Lee, Amanda Moy, Syed Mohtashim Abbas Bokhari, Kenrick Cato, Sarah Rossetti","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Documentation burden is experienced by clinical end-users of the electronic health record. Flowsheet measure reuse and clinical concept redundancy are two contributors to documentation burden. In this paper, we described nursing flowsheet documentation hierarchy and frequency of use for one month from two hospitals in our health system. We examined respiratory care management documentation in greater detail. We found 59 instances of reuse of respiratory care flowsheet measure fields over two or more templates and groups, and 5 instances of clinical concept redundancy. Flowsheet measure fields for physical assessment observations and measurements were the most frequently documented and most reused, whereas respiratory intervention documentation was less frequently reused. Further research should investigate the relationship between flowsheet measure reuse and redundancy and EHR information overload and documentation burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":72180,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":"2023 ","pages":"1297-1303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10785890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Documentation burden is experienced by clinical end-users of the electronic health record. Flowsheet measure reuse and clinical concept redundancy are two contributors to documentation burden. In this paper, we described nursing flowsheet documentation hierarchy and frequency of use for one month from two hospitals in our health system. We examined respiratory care management documentation in greater detail. We found 59 instances of reuse of respiratory care flowsheet measure fields over two or more templates and groups, and 5 instances of clinical concept redundancy. Flowsheet measure fields for physical assessment observations and measurements were the most frequently documented and most reused, whereas respiratory intervention documentation was less frequently reused. Further research should investigate the relationship between flowsheet measure reuse and redundancy and EHR information overload and documentation burden.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别呼吸流程表文档中的重复使用和冗余:对临床医生文档负担的影响。
电子病历的临床最终用户都会遇到文档负担问题。流程表措施重复使用和临床概念冗余是造成文档负担的两个因素。在本文中,我们描述了我们医疗系统中两家医院一个月内护理流程表文档的层次结构和使用频率。我们更详细地检查了呼吸护理管理文件。我们发现在两个或两个以上的模板和组别中重复使用呼吸护理流程表测量字段的情况有 59 例,临床概念重复的情况有 5 例。物理评估观察和测量的流程表测量字段是最常记录和重复使用的,而呼吸干预记录的重复使用频率较低。进一步的研究应探讨流程表措施重复使用和冗余与电子病历信息过载和文档负担之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethicara for Responsible AI in Healthcare: A System for Bias Detection and AI Risk Management. Towards Fair Patient-Trial Matching via Patient-Criterion Level Fairness Constraint. Towards Understanding the Generalization of Medical Text-to-SQL Models and Datasets. Transferable and Interpretable Treatment Effectiveness Prediction for Ovarian Cancer via Multimodal Deep Learning. Understanding Cancer Caregiving and Predicting Burden: An Analytics and Machine Learning Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1