Psychometric properties of the digital competences scale in regular basic education teachers

Luis Alberto Geraldo-Campos , Romel Arturo Rosales-Gomero , Juan Jesús Soria Quijaite , Jacksaint Saintila
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the digital competences scale in regular basic education teachers","authors":"Luis Alberto Geraldo-Campos ,&nbsp;Romel Arturo Rosales-Gomero ,&nbsp;Juan Jesús Soria Quijaite ,&nbsp;Jacksaint Saintila","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since the introduction of technology in the classroom, there has been a growing demand for digital competencies, which has driven the need for validated instruments to assess this concept more prominently. Therefore, this study determined the psychometric properties of a self-assessment scale of digital competencies for teachers of Regular Basic Education. The study was carried out in the Unidad de Gestión Educativa Local (UGEL)/District Education Management Unit of Barranca and Huaura located north of Lima, Peru. A cross-sectional and instrumental quantitative methodological strategy was used, in which exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) techniques were used, and 534 teachers were surveyed. The results show an EFA with two factors and loadings greater than 0.4, a KMO equal to 0.957, and a cumulative variance of 51.30%. The CFA analysis validated three models, where model 2 with three factors, Evaluación y Promoción (EP)/Evaluation and Promotion; Recursos Digitales en la Enseñanza (RDE)/Digital Resources in Teaching; and Participación Profesional en el Aprendizaje (PPA)/Professional Participation in Learning, yielded high correlations and adequate goodness-of-fit indices close to unity (X<sup>2</sup>/df =1.476; RMSEA=0.042; TLI=0.97; and CFI=0.97). It can be observed that model 2, which includes three factors, presents more appropriate measures, which makes it the most suitable option for assessing digital competencies in teachers of Regular Basic Education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000098/pdfft?md5=d255b8b6fd4dbb3b2a75370d18c2b49b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666374024000098-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the introduction of technology in the classroom, there has been a growing demand for digital competencies, which has driven the need for validated instruments to assess this concept more prominently. Therefore, this study determined the psychometric properties of a self-assessment scale of digital competencies for teachers of Regular Basic Education. The study was carried out in the Unidad de Gestión Educativa Local (UGEL)/District Education Management Unit of Barranca and Huaura located north of Lima, Peru. A cross-sectional and instrumental quantitative methodological strategy was used, in which exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) techniques were used, and 534 teachers were surveyed. The results show an EFA with two factors and loadings greater than 0.4, a KMO equal to 0.957, and a cumulative variance of 51.30%. The CFA analysis validated three models, where model 2 with three factors, Evaluación y Promoción (EP)/Evaluation and Promotion; Recursos Digitales en la Enseñanza (RDE)/Digital Resources in Teaching; and Participación Profesional en el Aprendizaje (PPA)/Professional Participation in Learning, yielded high correlations and adequate goodness-of-fit indices close to unity (X2/df =1.476; RMSEA=0.042; TLI=0.97; and CFI=0.97). It can be observed that model 2, which includes three factors, presents more appropriate measures, which makes it the most suitable option for assessing digital competencies in teachers of Regular Basic Education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常规基础教育教师数字能力量表的心理测量特性
自从将技术引入课堂以来,对数字化能力的需求日益增长,这促使人们需要更突出地评估这一概念的有效工具。因此,本研究确定了常规基础教育教师数字能力自评量表的心理测量特性。研究在秘鲁利马北部巴兰卡和瓦乌拉的地方教育管理单位(UGEL)/地区教育管理单位进行。研究采用了横断面和工具性定量方法策略,其中使用了探索性因子分析(EFA)和确证性因子分析(CFA)技术,对 534 名教师进行了调查。结果显示,EFA 有两个因子,载荷大于 0.4,KMO 等于 0.957,累计方差为 51.30%。CFA 分析验证了三个模型,其中模型 2 包含三个因子:Evaluación y Promoción (EP)/Evaluation and Promotion;Recursos Digitales en la Enseñanza (RDE)/Digital Resources in Teaching;Participación Profesional en el Aprendizaje (PPA)/Professional Participation in Learning,产生了较高的相关性,拟合优度指数接近统一(X2/df =1.476;RMSEA=0.042;TLI=0.97;CFI=0.97)。可以看出,包含三个因子的模型 2 提出了更合适的测量方法,因此是评估常规基础教育教师数字化能力的最合适方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Navigating the virtual landscape: A systematic review of approaches to cultivating a sense of community among distance learners in health and allied health disciplines Approaching a substantive theory of moral reckoning in special education leadership: Innovative grounded theory methods using extant data on principals An assessment of the Education Management Information System in Sierra Leone and potential for enhanced disability inclusiveness AI chatbots: A disguised enemy for academic integrity? The role of students’ perceived teacher support in student motivation: A longitudinal study of student motivation profiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1