Individual differences in structural priming in bilingual and monolingual children: the influence of perspective-taking

IF 1.1 3区 心理学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language and Cognition Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI:10.1017/langcog.2023.71
Joyce L. van Zwet, Sharon Unsworth
{"title":"Individual differences in structural priming in bilingual and monolingual children: the influence of perspective-taking","authors":"Joyce L. van Zwet, Sharon Unsworth","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2023.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When speaking or writing, people tend to re-use the syntactic structures they recently encountered (<span>structural priming</span>). Individuals differ in the extent to which they are primed (<span>primeability</span>). Previous research has suggested that perspective-taking, that is, the ability to imagine the feelings, thoughts and perceptions of others, predicts the magnitude of priming in adults. The present study investigates if this also holds for monolingual and bilingual children. We primed the possessive structure in monolingual Dutch children and bilingual children with varying L2s. There was individual variation in children’s primeability in both groups. For both monolinguals and bilinguals, we found that the better children were at perspective-taking, the more likely they were to be primed. Dutch language proficiency also influenced children’s primeability: higher language proficiency resulted in more priming in both groups. The findings suggest that structural priming serves a social function which is mediated by perspective-taking abilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":45880,"journal":{"name":"Language and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2023.71","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When speaking or writing, people tend to re-use the syntactic structures they recently encountered (structural priming). Individuals differ in the extent to which they are primed (primeability). Previous research has suggested that perspective-taking, that is, the ability to imagine the feelings, thoughts and perceptions of others, predicts the magnitude of priming in adults. The present study investigates if this also holds for monolingual and bilingual children. We primed the possessive structure in monolingual Dutch children and bilingual children with varying L2s. There was individual variation in children’s primeability in both groups. For both monolinguals and bilinguals, we found that the better children were at perspective-taking, the more likely they were to be primed. Dutch language proficiency also influenced children’s primeability: higher language proficiency resulted in more priming in both groups. The findings suggest that structural priming serves a social function which is mediated by perspective-taking abilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双语和单语儿童结构引物的个体差异:透视法的影响
在说话或写作时,人们倾向于重复使用他们最近遇到过的句法结构(结构引物)。每个人被引诱的程度不同(引诱性)。以往的研究表明,透视能力(即想象他人的感受、想法和看法的能力)可以预测成人的引物程度。本研究探讨了这一点是否也适用于单语和双语儿童。我们对单语荷兰语儿童和使用不同第二语言的双语儿童进行了占有性结构的引申。两组儿童的引物能力存在个体差异。我们发现,无论是单语儿童还是双语儿童,透视能力越强的儿童越有可能被诱导。荷兰语水平也会影响儿童的引物能力:语言水平越高,两组儿童的引物能力越强。研究结果表明,结构性引物具有社会功能,而透视能力则是社会功能的中介。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Multimodal training on L2 Japanese pitch accent: learning outcomes, neural correlates and subjective assessments Head metonymies and metaphors in Jordanian and Tunisian Arabic: an extended conceptual metaphor theory perspective Facial expressions in different communication settings: A case of whispering and speaking with a face mask in Farsi The effect of emotional prosody and referent characteristics on novel noun learning Inherent linguistic preference outcompetes incidental alignment in cooperative partner choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1