Preserving the placebo effect after disclosure: A new perspective on non-deceptive placebos

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY British journal of psychology Pub Date : 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1111/bjop.12696
Mehran Emadi Andani, Diletta Barbiani, Marco Bonetto, Rudy Menegaldo, Bernardo Villa-Sánchez, Mirta Fiorio
{"title":"Preserving the placebo effect after disclosure: A new perspective on non-deceptive placebos","authors":"Mehran Emadi Andani,&nbsp;Diletta Barbiani,&nbsp;Marco Bonetto,&nbsp;Rudy Menegaldo,&nbsp;Bernardo Villa-Sánchez,&nbsp;Mirta Fiorio","doi":"10.1111/bjop.12696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present study explores whether a particular style of placebo disclosure could serve as a tool to foster a renewed trust in one's own inherent resources and elicit a meaningful placebo effect. In a motor performance task, two placebo groups received inert transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in each of four sessions along with information on its force-enhancing properties. Before the final session, one of the placebo groups was informed about the placebo, which was portrayed as a means to unleash an inherent potential. Along with force, we systematically monitored task-specific self-efficacy to test whether this variable would be differentially modulated in the two placebo groups. Compared to two control groups, placebo groups showed higher force and self-efficacy in the last session. No differences in self-efficacy were observed in the placebo groups even after revealing the placebo procedure, suggesting that the disclosure was effective in ‘safeguarding’ individuals' self-efficacy. These findings may have important implications, paving the way for the use of placebos that not only are ethically permissible but also support individuals' self-efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":"115 3","pages":"437-453"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjop.12696","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjop.12696","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study explores whether a particular style of placebo disclosure could serve as a tool to foster a renewed trust in one's own inherent resources and elicit a meaningful placebo effect. In a motor performance task, two placebo groups received inert transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in each of four sessions along with information on its force-enhancing properties. Before the final session, one of the placebo groups was informed about the placebo, which was portrayed as a means to unleash an inherent potential. Along with force, we systematically monitored task-specific self-efficacy to test whether this variable would be differentially modulated in the two placebo groups. Compared to two control groups, placebo groups showed higher force and self-efficacy in the last session. No differences in self-efficacy were observed in the placebo groups even after revealing the placebo procedure, suggesting that the disclosure was effective in ‘safeguarding’ individuals' self-efficacy. These findings may have important implications, paving the way for the use of placebos that not only are ethically permissible but also support individuals' self-efficacy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在信息披露后保留安慰剂效应:非欺骗性安慰剂的新视角。
本研究探讨了一种特殊的安慰剂披露方式能否作为一种工具,促进人们对自身固有资源的重新信任,并引发有意义的安慰剂效应。在一项运动表现任务中,两个安慰剂组分别在四个疗程中接受了惰性经皮神经电刺激(TENS)以及有关其增强力量特性的信息。在最后一个疗程之前,其中一组安慰剂被告知安慰剂是一种释放内在潜能的手段。除了力量,我们还系统地监测了特定任务的自我效能感,以检验这一变量是否会在两个安慰剂组中受到不同程度的调节。与两个对照组相比,安慰剂组在最后一次训练中表现出更高的力量和自我效能感。即使在揭示了安慰剂程序之后,也没有观察到安慰剂组在自我效能感方面的差异,这表明揭示程序在 "保护 "个人自我效能感方面是有效的。这些发现可能具有重要意义,为使用安慰剂铺平了道路,安慰剂不仅在伦理上是允许的,而且还能支持个人的自我效能感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British journal of psychology
British journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychology publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognition; health and clinical psychology; developmental, social and occupational psychology. For information on specific requirements, please view Notes for Contributors. We attract a large number of international submissions each year which make major contributions across the range of psychology.
期刊最新文献
Attention and vigilance advantages related to formal musical training across childhood, adolescence and young adulthood. The effects of implicit emotion regulation on impulsive choice. No evidence that same-language subtitles improve children's reading fluency. The effectiveness of implementation intentions in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Suppressing food-related memories via think/no-think: Effective retrieval inhibition across weight status.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1