Restructuring healthcare services, routines and procedures on reproductive medicine based on respect for differences.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI:10.5935/1518-0557.20230061
Nelson Antunes Junior, Andrea Giannotti Galuppo, Jonathas Borges Soares, Sidney Glina
{"title":"Restructuring healthcare services, routines and procedures on reproductive medicine based on respect for differences.","authors":"Nelson Antunes Junior, Andrea Giannotti Galuppo, Jonathas Borges Soares, Sidney Glina","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20230061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the term homosexuality was removed from the International Classification of Diseases and trans identities from mental disorders, these classifications promote the pathologizing of homosexuality. The direct consequence is discrimination, which adds to the difficulty in carrying out accurate information related to the LGBT population and makes it very difficult to organize public policies suited to their needs. An important issue is related to the limited access of that population to assisted reproduction techniques, when compared to traditional families. The desire for same sex couples and transgender persons to have biological children is reportedly the same as for cisgender persons, but parenthood can be a much greater endeavor both medically and psychologically for them. The right to health includes freedom to control one's health and body, including sexual and reproductive issues. Despite these difficulties, we are living in a period of great social progress that increases access to assisted reproduction among novel patient populations. With legalization of gay marriage, individuals and couples who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender, may seek to begin or expand their families with assisted reproduction technologies. Therefore, the aim of this review was to assist in the restructuring of healthcare services, routines and procedures, mainly related to reproductive medicine, in order to promote changes in values based on respect for differences. In conclusion, the healthcare personnel of fertility centers should undergo specific training and preparations to meet the specific demands of the LGBT patient population and to overcome communication barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":" ","pages":"96-102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10936915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20230061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the term homosexuality was removed from the International Classification of Diseases and trans identities from mental disorders, these classifications promote the pathologizing of homosexuality. The direct consequence is discrimination, which adds to the difficulty in carrying out accurate information related to the LGBT population and makes it very difficult to organize public policies suited to their needs. An important issue is related to the limited access of that population to assisted reproduction techniques, when compared to traditional families. The desire for same sex couples and transgender persons to have biological children is reportedly the same as for cisgender persons, but parenthood can be a much greater endeavor both medically and psychologically for them. The right to health includes freedom to control one's health and body, including sexual and reproductive issues. Despite these difficulties, we are living in a period of great social progress that increases access to assisted reproduction among novel patient populations. With legalization of gay marriage, individuals and couples who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender, may seek to begin or expand their families with assisted reproduction technologies. Therefore, the aim of this review was to assist in the restructuring of healthcare services, routines and procedures, mainly related to reproductive medicine, in order to promote changes in values based on respect for differences. In conclusion, the healthcare personnel of fertility centers should undergo specific training and preparations to meet the specific demands of the LGBT patient population and to overcome communication barriers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在尊重差异的基础上,调整生殖医学方面的医疗服务、常规和程序。
尽管同性恋一词已从《国际疾病分类》中删除,变性身份也从精神疾病中删除,但这些分类仍在推动同性恋病理学化。其直接后果就是歧视,这增加了获取有关男女同性恋、双性恋和变性者的准确信息的难度,也使得制定适合他们需求的公共政策变得非常困难。一个重要的问题是,与传统家庭相比,他们获得辅助生殖技术的机会有限。据报道,同性伴侣和变性人希望拥有亲生子女的愿望与双性恋者相同,但对他们来说,为人父母在医疗和心理上都是一项艰巨得多的工作。健康权包括自由控制自己的健康和身体,包括性和生殖问题。尽管存在这些困难,但我们正生活在一个巨大的社会进步时期,新型患者群体获得辅助生殖的机会越来越多。随着同性恋婚姻的合法化,被认定为女同性恋者、男同性恋者、双性恋者和变性者的个人和夫妇可能会寻求通过辅助生殖技术开始或扩大他们的家庭。因此,本综述旨在协助调整主要与生殖医学有关的医疗保健服务、常规和程序,以促进基于尊重差异的价值观变革。总之,生殖中心的医护人员应接受专门的培训和准备,以满足女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性者患者群体的特殊需求,并克服沟通障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
期刊最新文献
Effects of dietary quercetin on retrieved mouse oocytes and in vitro fertilization outcomes. Increased antinuclear (anti-Sm) antibodies in infertile patients with peritoneal endometriosis. Microfluidic in compared with Zeta potential, MACS and swim up methods, resulted in improved chromatin integrity and high quality sperms. Quality of information on fertility clinic websites accredited by the Latin American Network of Assisted Reproduction. Deleterious Effects of Caffeine Consumption on Reproductive Functions of Female Wistar Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1