Comparison of home detection algorithms using smartphone GPS data

IF 3 2区 计算机科学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS EPJ Data Science Pub Date : 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00447-w
Rajat Verma, Shagun Mittal, Zengxiang Lei, Xiaowei Chen, Satish V. Ukkusuri
{"title":"Comparison of home detection algorithms using smartphone GPS data","authors":"Rajat Verma, Shagun Mittal, Zengxiang Lei, Xiaowei Chen, Satish V. Ukkusuri","doi":"10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00447-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Estimation of people’s home locations using location-based services data from smartphones is a common task in human mobility assessment. However, commonly used home detection algorithms (HDAs) are often arbitrary and unexamined. In this study, we review existing HDAs and examine five HDAs using eight high-quality mobile phone geolocation datasets. These include four commonly used HDAs as well as an HDA proposed in this work. To make quantitative comparisons, we propose three novel metrics to assess the quality of detected home locations and test them on eight datasets across four U.S. cities. We find that all three metrics show a consistent rank of HDAs’ performances, with the proposed HDA outperforming the others. We infer that the temporal and spatial continuity of the geolocation data points matters more than the overall size of the data for accurate home detection. We also find that HDAs with high (and similar) performance metrics tend to create results with better consistency and closer to common expectations. Further, the performance deteriorates with decreasing data quality of the devices, though the patterns of relative performance persist. Finally, we show how the differences in home detection can lead to substantial differences in subsequent inferences using two case studies—(i) hurricane evacuation estimation, and (ii) correlation of mobility patterns with socioeconomic status. Our work contributes to improving the transparency of large-scale human mobility assessment applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11887,"journal":{"name":"EPJ Data Science","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPJ Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00447-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estimation of people’s home locations using location-based services data from smartphones is a common task in human mobility assessment. However, commonly used home detection algorithms (HDAs) are often arbitrary and unexamined. In this study, we review existing HDAs and examine five HDAs using eight high-quality mobile phone geolocation datasets. These include four commonly used HDAs as well as an HDA proposed in this work. To make quantitative comparisons, we propose three novel metrics to assess the quality of detected home locations and test them on eight datasets across four U.S. cities. We find that all three metrics show a consistent rank of HDAs’ performances, with the proposed HDA outperforming the others. We infer that the temporal and spatial continuity of the geolocation data points matters more than the overall size of the data for accurate home detection. We also find that HDAs with high (and similar) performance metrics tend to create results with better consistency and closer to common expectations. Further, the performance deteriorates with decreasing data quality of the devices, though the patterns of relative performance persist. Finally, we show how the differences in home detection can lead to substantial differences in subsequent inferences using two case studies—(i) hurricane evacuation estimation, and (ii) correlation of mobility patterns with socioeconomic status. Our work contributes to improving the transparency of large-scale human mobility assessment applications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用智能手机 GPS 数据的住宅检测算法比较
利用智能手机提供的定位服务数据估算人们的家庭位置是人类移动性评估中的一项常见任务。然而,常用的家庭检测算法(HDAs)往往是任意的,未经研究。在本研究中,我们回顾了现有的 HDA,并使用八个高质量的手机地理定位数据集研究了五种 HDA。其中包括四种常用的 HDA 以及本文提出的一种 HDA。为了进行定量比较,我们提出了三个新指标来评估检测到的家庭位置的质量,并在美国四个城市的八个数据集上进行了测试。我们发现,所有三个指标都显示出 HDA 性能的一致排名,其中提议的 HDA 优于其他指标。我们推断,地理位置数据点在时间和空间上的连续性比数据的整体大小对准确的住宅检测更为重要。我们还发现,具有较高(和相似)性能指标的 HDA 所创建的结果往往具有较好的一致性,更接近普通预期。此外,随着设备数据质量的下降,性能也会下降,但相对性能的模式依然存在。最后,我们通过两个案例研究--(i) 飓风疏散估计和 (ii) 移动模式与社会经济地位的相关性,展示了家庭检测的差异如何导致后续推断的巨大差异。我们的工作有助于提高大规模人类流动性评估应用的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EPJ Data Science
EPJ Data Science MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
53
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EPJ Data Science covers a broad range of research areas and applications and particularly encourages contributions from techno-socio-economic systems, where it comprises those research lines that now regard the digital “tracks” of human beings as first-order objects for scientific investigation. Topics include, but are not limited to, human behavior, social interaction (including animal societies), economic and financial systems, management and business networks, socio-technical infrastructure, health and environmental systems, the science of science, as well as general risk and crisis scenario forecasting up to and including policy advice.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of home detection algorithms using smartphone GPS data What relational event models can reveal: Commentary on Thomas Grund’s “Dynamics of Denunciation: The Limits of a Scandal” On the duration of face-to-face contacts Computational social science with confidence Public perception of generative AI on Twitter: an empirical study based on occupation and usage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1