Surgical Approach to Bilateral Inguinal Hernia. A Case-Control Study.

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Chirurgia Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.21614/chirurgia.2023.v.118.i.6.p.642
Claudiu-Octavian Ungureanu, Octav Ginghina, Floris Stanculea, Ileana Vacaroiu, Cosmin Ene, Razvan Iosifescu, Dragoà Eugen Georgescu, Daniel Alin Cristian, Valentin Titus Grigorean, Niculae Iordache
{"title":"Surgical Approach to Bilateral Inguinal Hernia. A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Claudiu-Octavian Ungureanu, Octav Ginghina, Floris Stanculea, Ileana Vacaroiu, Cosmin Ene, Razvan Iosifescu, Dragoà Eugen Georgescu, Daniel Alin Cristian, Valentin Titus Grigorean, Niculae Iordache","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.2023.v.118.i.6.p.642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Bilateral inguinal hernia can be safely repaired simultaneously, open or minimally invasive, in an elective sce-nario. The choice of surgical approach depends on the patient's status, hernia characteristics, surgeons and patient preferences. Whether age criteria should be considered when selecting between the two approaches is still a matter of debate. Considering that there is no consensus regarding the best repair in bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy, the aim of the study is to perform an analysis regarding elective surgical approach of patients with bilateral inguinal hernias. Material and <b>Methods:</b> To study the relationship between exposure to an open versus laparoscopic approach in patients with bilateral inguinal hernia, we conducted a case-control study. In our retrospective analysis, cases (23 patients) were the open-approach hernia repair, and controls (82 patients) were laparoscopic hernia repair. We analyzed two sets of variables: first, related to patient characteristics (age 65 years, BMI 30 kg/m2, smoking habit, HTA status, COPD status, DM status, use of anticoagulants, presence of neoplastic status) and second, variables related to hernia features (inguinoscrotal hernia, recurrent hernia and complicated hernia). <b>Results:</b> The mean age for cases was 73.26 (Ã+-12.99) years and that of controls, was 56.48 (Ã+-15.15) years. Univariate analysis demonstrated four variables with statistical significance: age 65 years, inguinoscrotal hernia, neo-plastic status, and anticoagulant use. When introduced into the multivariate analysis, we noted that only two variables, age 65 years (OR=4.183, 95% CI [1.289, 13.572], p=0.017) and use of anticoagulants (OR=38.876, 95% CI [1.305, 1158.011], p=0.035) reached statistical significance. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that when we refer to bilateral inguinal hernia repair, patients aged 65 years are at risk of having an open procedure at least fourfold more than patients aged 65 years. In addition, the use of anticoagulants increases the risk of open hernia repair 38 times more than that of minimally invasive repair for the same age group. Interestingly, in our study, hernia characteristics were not found to be associated with open hernia repair and age 65 years. In our study we found that age 65 years is associated with electing open hernia repair over minimally invasive repair, which can be linked to age-related risk factors. Further re-search is needed to investigate the impact of age and age-related risk factors on surgical outcomes of bilateral inguinal hernia repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"118 6","pages":"642-653"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2023.v.118.i.6.p.642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bilateral inguinal hernia can be safely repaired simultaneously, open or minimally invasive, in an elective sce-nario. The choice of surgical approach depends on the patient's status, hernia characteristics, surgeons and patient preferences. Whether age criteria should be considered when selecting between the two approaches is still a matter of debate. Considering that there is no consensus regarding the best repair in bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy, the aim of the study is to perform an analysis regarding elective surgical approach of patients with bilateral inguinal hernias. Material and Methods: To study the relationship between exposure to an open versus laparoscopic approach in patients with bilateral inguinal hernia, we conducted a case-control study. In our retrospective analysis, cases (23 patients) were the open-approach hernia repair, and controls (82 patients) were laparoscopic hernia repair. We analyzed two sets of variables: first, related to patient characteristics (age 65 years, BMI 30 kg/m2, smoking habit, HTA status, COPD status, DM status, use of anticoagulants, presence of neoplastic status) and second, variables related to hernia features (inguinoscrotal hernia, recurrent hernia and complicated hernia). Results: The mean age for cases was 73.26 (Ã+-12.99) years and that of controls, was 56.48 (Ã+-15.15) years. Univariate analysis demonstrated four variables with statistical significance: age 65 years, inguinoscrotal hernia, neo-plastic status, and anticoagulant use. When introduced into the multivariate analysis, we noted that only two variables, age 65 years (OR=4.183, 95% CI [1.289, 13.572], p=0.017) and use of anticoagulants (OR=38.876, 95% CI [1.305, 1158.011], p=0.035) reached statistical significance. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that when we refer to bilateral inguinal hernia repair, patients aged 65 years are at risk of having an open procedure at least fourfold more than patients aged 65 years. In addition, the use of anticoagulants increases the risk of open hernia repair 38 times more than that of minimally invasive repair for the same age group. Interestingly, in our study, hernia characteristics were not found to be associated with open hernia repair and age 65 years. In our study we found that age 65 years is associated with electing open hernia repair over minimally invasive repair, which can be linked to age-related risk factors. Further re-search is needed to investigate the impact of age and age-related risk factors on surgical outcomes of bilateral inguinal hernia repair.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双侧腹股沟疝气的手术方法。病例对照研究。
导言:双侧腹股沟疝可在择期手术中同时进行开放式或微创式安全修补。手术方式的选择取决于患者的状况、疝气特征、外科医生和患者的偏好。在选择这两种方法时,是否应考虑年龄标准仍是一个争论不休的问题。考虑到对双侧腹股沟疝的最佳修补方法尚未达成共识,本研究旨在对双侧腹股沟疝患者的选择性手术方法进行分析。材料和方法:为了研究双侧腹股沟疝患者采用开腹手术与腹腔镜手术之间的关系,我们进行了一项病例对照研究。在我们的回顾性分析中,病例(23 名患者)为开放式疝修补术,对照组(82 名患者)为腹腔镜疝修补术。我们分析了两组变量:第一组是与患者特征相关的变量(年龄 65 岁、体重指数 30 kg/m2、吸烟习惯、HTA 状态、慢性阻塞性肺病状态、糖尿病状态、抗凝药物的使用、肿瘤状态),第二组是与疝气特征相关的变量(腹股沟疝、复发疝和复杂疝)。研究结果病例的平均年龄为73.26(+-12.99)岁,对照组的平均年龄为56.48(+-15.15)岁。单变量分析显示有四个变量具有统计学意义:65岁、腹股沟斜疝、新发整形状态和使用抗凝剂。当引入多变量分析时,我们注意到只有两个变量,即 65 岁(OR=4.183,95% CI [1.289,13.572],P=0.017)和使用抗凝剂(OR=38.876,95% CI [1.305,1158.011],P=0.035)具有统计学意义。结论本研究表明,当我们提及双侧腹股沟疝修补术时,65 岁患者接受开放手术的风险至少是 65 岁患者的四倍。此外,对于同一年龄段的患者,使用抗凝剂会使开放式疝修补术的风险比微创修补术高出 38 倍。有趣的是,在我们的研究中,没有发现疝气特征与开放性疝气修补术和 65 岁年龄有关。在我们的研究中,我们发现 65 岁与选择开放式疝修补术而非微创修补术有关,这可能与年龄相关的风险因素有关。还需要进一步研究年龄和年龄相关风险因素对双侧腹股沟疝修补术手术效果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chirurgia
Chirurgia Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal. In Chirurgia, original papers in the area of general surgery which neither appeared, nor were sent for publication in other periodicals, can be published. You can send original articles, new surgical techniques, or comprehensive general reports on surgical topics, clinical case presentations and, depending on publication space, - reviews of some articles of general interest to surgeons from other publications. Chirurgia is also a place for sharing information about the activity of various branches of the Romanian Society of Surgery, information on Congresses and Symposiums organized by the Romanian Society of Surgery and participation notes in other scientific meetings. Letters to the editor: Letters commenting on papers published in Chirurgia are welcomed. They should contain substantive ideas and commentaries supported by appropriate data, and should not exceed 2 pages. Please submit these letters to the editor through our online system.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Lymphatic Drainage Through Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Melanoma Using a Radioactive Tracer - Technetium-99m (99mTc). Young RAES Minimally Invasive Surgery Training and Education Survey in Romania. Axillary Lymph Node Dissection versus Loco-regional Radiotherapy in Management of the Axilla in Node-Negative Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Post Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Axillary Reverse Mapping Using Indocyanine Green and Concurrent Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients with or without Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment. Diagnosis and Management of Postoperative Complications in Rectal Cancer Surgery - A Five-Year Retrospective Study in a Single Surgical Unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1