Cryotherapy versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus with or without early esophageal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical Endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-17 DOI:10.5946/ce.2023.065
Igor Logetto Caetité Gomes, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Sérgio Barbosa Marques, Alexandre de Sousa Carlos, Beanie Conceição Medeiros Nunes, Bruno Salomão Hirsch, Guilherme Henrique Peixoto de Oliveira, Roberto Paolo Trasolini, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
{"title":"Cryotherapy versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus with or without early esophageal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Igor Logetto Caetité Gomes, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Sérgio Barbosa Marques, Alexandre de Sousa Carlos, Beanie Conceição Medeiros Nunes, Bruno Salomão Hirsch, Guilherme Henrique Peixoto de Oliveira, Roberto Paolo Trasolini, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura","doi":"10.5946/ce.2023.065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the first-line therapy for dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE). Therefore, cryotherapy has emerged as an alternative treatment option. This study aimed to compare the efficacies of these two techniques based on the rates of complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) and dysplasia (CE-D). Adverse events and recurrence have also been reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic search was conducted using the Medline (PubMed), Embase, LILACS, and Google Scholar databases until December 2022. Studies were included comparing cryotherapy and RFA for treating dysplastic BE with or without early esophageal neoplasia. This study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three retrospective cohort studies involving 627 patients were included. Of these, 399 patients underwent RFA, and 228 were treated with cryotherapy. There was no difference in CE-IM (risk difference [RD], -0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.25 to 0.19; p=0.78; I2=86%) as well as in CE-D (RD, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.15 to 0.09; p=0.64; I2=70%) between the groups. The absolute number of adverse events was low, and there was no difference in the recurrence rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cryotherapy and RFA were equally effective in treating dysplastic BE, with or without early esophageal neoplasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":10351,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":"181-190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the first-line therapy for dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE). Therefore, cryotherapy has emerged as an alternative treatment option. This study aimed to compare the efficacies of these two techniques based on the rates of complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) and dysplasia (CE-D). Adverse events and recurrence have also been reported.

Methods: An electronic search was conducted using the Medline (PubMed), Embase, LILACS, and Google Scholar databases until December 2022. Studies were included comparing cryotherapy and RFA for treating dysplastic BE with or without early esophageal neoplasia. This study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Results: Three retrospective cohort studies involving 627 patients were included. Of these, 399 patients underwent RFA, and 228 were treated with cryotherapy. There was no difference in CE-IM (risk difference [RD], -0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.25 to 0.19; p=0.78; I2=86%) as well as in CE-D (RD, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.15 to 0.09; p=0.64; I2=70%) between the groups. The absolute number of adverse events was low, and there was no difference in the recurrence rate.

Conclusion: Cryotherapy and RFA were equally effective in treating dysplastic BE, with or without early esophageal neoplasia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冷冻疗法与射频消融术在治疗伴有或不伴有早期食管肿瘤的发育不良巴雷特食管中的比较:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景/目的:射频消融(RFA)是治疗发育不良的巴雷特食管(BE)的一线疗法。因此,冷冻疗法已成为一种替代疗法。本研究旨在根据完全消除肠化生(CE-IM)和发育不良(CE-D)的比率,比较这两种技术的疗效。此外,还报告了不良事件和复发情况:方法:使用 Medline (PubMed)、Embase、LILACS 和 Google Scholar 数据库进行电子检索,检索期至 2022 年 12 月。纳入的研究对冷冻疗法和射频消融术治疗伴有或不伴有早期食管肿瘤的发育不良 BE 进行了比较。本研究根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南进行:结果:共纳入了三项回顾性队列研究,涉及 627 名患者。其中,399 名患者接受了 RFA 治疗,228 名患者接受了冷冻治疗。两组患者的CE-IM(风险差异[RD],-0.03;95% 置信区间[CI],-0.25 至 0.19;P=0.78;I2=86%)和CE-D(风险差异[RD],-0.03;95% 置信区间[CI],-0.15 至 0.09;P=0.64;I2=70%)均无差异。不良反应的绝对数量较低,复发率也没有差异:结论:冷冻疗法和射频消融术在治疗有或没有早期食管肿瘤的发育不良BE方面同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Endoscopy
Clinical Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic vacuum therapy for gastrointestinal transmural defects: a literature review. Effectiveness of a novel ex vivo training model for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection training: a prospective observational study conducted at a single center in Japan. Microbiological surveillance result of endoscopes after INTERCEPT Foam Spray: a quasi-experimental pilot study in Singapore. Technical challenges and safety of prophylactic gallbladder stenting with metallic biliary stenting. The impact of linked color imaging on adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1